Preservation of posterior condylar offset (PCO) has been shown to correlate with improved functional results after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Whether this is also the case for revision TKA, remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the independent effect of PCO on early functional outcome after revision TKA. A total of 107 consecutive aseptic revision TKAs were performed by a single surgeon during an eight-year period. The mean age was 69.4 years (39 to 85) and there were 59 female patients and 48 male patients. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Short-form (SF)-12 score were assessed pre-operatively and one year post-operatively. Patient satisfaction was also assessed at one year. Joint line and PCO were assessed radiographically at one year.Objectives
Methods
The aim of this study was to identify predictors of return to
work (RTW) after revision lower limb arthroplasty in patients of
working age in the United Kingdom. We assessed 55 patients aged ≤ 65 years after revision total
hip arthroplasty (THA). There were 43 women and 12 men with a mean
age of 54 years (23 to 65). We also reviewed 30 patients after revision
total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 14 women and 16 men with
a mean age of 58 years (48 to 64). Preoperatively, age, gender,
body mass index, social deprivation, mode of failure, length of
primary implant survival, work status and nature, activity level
(University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score), and Oxford
Hip and Knee Scores were recorded. Postoperatively, RTW status,
Oxford Hip and Knee Scores, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), UCLA score, and
Work, Osteoarthritis and Joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ)
scores were obtained. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
The number of arthroplasties of the hip and knee
is predicted to increase rapidly during the next 20 years. Accompanying
this is the dilemma of how to follow-up these patients appropriately.
Current guidelines recommend long-term follow-up to identify patients
with aseptic loosening, which can occur more than a decade postoperatively.
The current guidelines and practices of orthopaedic surgeons vary
widely. Existing models take up much clinical time and are expensive.
Pilot studies using ‘virtual’ clinics and advanced-practice physiotherapists
have shown promise in decreasing the time and costs for orthopaedic surgeons
and patients. This review discusses current practices and future trends in
the follow-up of patients who have an arthroplasty. Cite this article:
A key to the success of revision total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) is a safe surgical approach using an exposure that minimises
complications. In most patients, a medial parapatellar arthrotomy
with complete synovectomy is sufficient. If additional exposure
is needed, a quadriceps snip performed through the quadriceps tendon
often provides the additional exposure required. It is simple to
perform and does not alter the post-operative rehabilitative protocol.
In rare cases, in which additional exposure is needed, or when removal
of a cemented long-stemmed tibial component is required, a tibial
tubercle osteotomy (TTO) may be used. Given the risk of post-operative
extensor lag, a V-Y quadricepsplasty is rarely indicated and usually
considered only if TTO is not possible. Cite this article:
Instability is a common indication for early
revision after both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty
(TKA), accounting for up to 20% in the literature. The number of
TKAs performed annually continues to climb exponentially, thus having
an effective algorithm for treatment is essential. This relies on
a thorough pre- and intra-operative assessment of the patient. The
underlying cause of the instability must be identified initially
and subsequently, the surgeon must be able to balance the flexion
and extension gaps and be comfortable using a variety of constrained
implants. This review describes the assessment of the unstable TKA, and
the authors’ preferred form of treatment for these difficult cases
where the source of instability is often multifactorial. Cite this article:
The treatment of bone loss in revision total
knee arthroplasty has evolved over the past decade. While the management
of small to moderate sized defects has demonstrated good results
with a variety of traditional techniques (cement and screws, small
metal augments, impaction bone grafting or modular stems), the treatment of
severe defects continues to be problematic. The use of a structural
allograft has declined in recent years due to an increased failure
rate with long-term follow-up and with the introduction of highly
porous metal augments that emphasise biological metaphyseal fixation.
Recently published mid-term results on the use of tantalum cones
in patients with severe bone loss has reaffirmed the success of
this treatment strategy. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to develop an accurate, reliable and easily applicable method for determining the anatomical location of the joint line during revision knee arthroplasty. The transepicondylar width (TEW), the perpendicular distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the distal articular surfaces (DMAD, DLAD) and the distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles and the posterior articular surfaces (PMAD, DLAD) were measured in 40 knees from 20 formalin-fixed adult cadavers (11 male and nine female; mean age at death 56.9 years, Objectives
Methods
Most problems encountered in complex revision
total knee arthroplasty can be managed with the wide range of implant
systems currently available. Modular metaphyseal sleeves, metallic
augments and cones provide stability even with significant bone
loss. Hinged designs substitute for significant ligamentous deficiencies.
Catastrophic failure that precludes successful reconstruction can
be encountered. The alternatives to arthroplasty in such drastic
situations include knee arthrodesis, resection arthroplasty and
amputation. The relative indications for the selection of these
alternatives are recurrent deep infection, immunocompromised host,
and extensive non-reconstructible bone or soft-tissue defects.
Antibiotic impregnated articulating spacers are
used in two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty to deliver local antibiotic
therapy while preserving function. We have observed infection control
in greater than 95% of cases with functional outcomes approaching
those seen in revision for aseptic loosening. Higher failure has
been observed with methicillin resistant organisms.
