Peri-prosthetic infection remains a leading cause
of revision surgery. Recent publications from the American Musculoskeletal
Infection Society have sought to establish a definition of peri-prosthetic
infection based on clinical findings and laboratory investigations.
The limitations of their approach are discussed and an alternative
definition is proposed, which it is felt may better reflect the
uncertainties encountered in clinical practice.
Adverse reaction to wear and corrosion debris
is a cause for concern in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Modular junctions
are a potential source of such wear products and are associated
with secondary pseudotumour formation. We present a consecutive series of 17 patients treated at our
unit for this complication following metal-on-highly cross-linked
polyethylene (MoP) THA. We emphasise the risk of misdiagnosis as
infection, and present the aggregate laboratory results and pathological
findings in this series. The clinical presentation was pain, swelling or instability.
Solid, cystic and mixed soft-tissue lesions were noted on imaging
and confirmed intra-operatively. Corrosion at the head–neck junction
was noted in all cases. No bacteria were isolated on multiple pre-
and intra-operative samples yet the mean erythrocyte sedimentation
rate was 49 (9 to 100) and C-reactive protein 32 (0.6 to 106) and
stromal polymorphonuclear cell counts were noted in nine cases. Adverse soft–tissue reactions can occur in MoP THA owing to corrosion
products released from the head–neck junction. The diagnosis should
be carefully considered when investigating pain after THA. This
may avoid the misdiagnosis of periprosthetic infection with an unidentified
organism and mitigate the unnecessary management of these cases
with complete single- or two-stage exchange. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to compare the
diagnostic accuracy for the detection of infection between the culture of
fluid obtained by sonication (SFC) and the culture of peri-implant
tissues (PITC) in patients with early and delayed implant failure,
and those with unsuspected and suspected septic failure. It was
hypothesised that SFC increases the diagnostic accuracy for infection
in delayed, but not early, implant failure, and in unsuspected septic
failure. The diagnostic accuracy for infection of all consecutive
implants (hardware or prostheses) that were removed for failure was
compared between SFC and PITC. This prospective study included 317
patients with a mean age of 62.7 years (9 to 97). The sensitivity
for detection of infection using SFC was higher than using PITC
in an overall comparison (89.9% Sonication is mainly recommended when there is implant failure
with no clear signs of infection and in patients with delayed implant
failure. In early failure, SFC is not superior to PITC for the diagnosis
of infection and, therefore, is not recommended as a routine diagnostic
test in these patients. Cite this article:
The December 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: national guidance on arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis is effective; unicompartmental knee replacement has the edge in terms of short-term complications; stiff knees, timing and manipulation; neuropathic pain and total knee replacement; synovial fluid α-defensin and CRP: a new gold standard in joint infection diagnosis?; how to assess anterior knee pain?; where is the evidence? Five new implants under the spotlight; and a fresh look at ACL reconstruction
The objective of this study was to compare the elution characteristics,
antimicrobial activity and mechanical properties of antibiotic-loaded
bone cement (ALBC) loaded with powdered antibiotic, powdered antibiotic
with inert filler (xylitol), or liquid antibiotic, particularly focusing
on vancomycin and amphotericin B. Cement specimens loaded with 2 g of vancomycin or amphotericin
B powder (powder group), 2 g of antibiotic powder and 2 g of xylitol
(xylitol group) or 12 ml of antibiotic solution containing 2 g of
antibiotic (liquid group) were tested.Objectives
Methods
The April 2014 Hip & Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Recent arthroplasty and flight; whether that squeak could be a fracture; diagnosing early infected hip replacement; impaction grafting at a decade; whether squeaking is more common than previously thought; femoral offset associated with post THR outcomes; and periprosthetic fracture stabilisation.
The rate of peri-prosthetic infection following
total joint replacement continues to rise, and attempts to curb
this trend have included the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement
at the time of primary surgery. We have investigated the clinical-
and cost-effectiveness of the use of antibiotic-loaded cement for
primary total knee replacement (TKR) by comparing the rate of infection
in 3048 TKRs performed without loaded cement over a three-year period The absolute rate of infection increased when antibiotic-loaded
cement was used in TKR. However, this rate of increase was less
than the rate of increase in infection following uncemented THR
during the same period. If the rise in the rate of infection observed
in THR were extrapolated to the TKR cohort, 18 additional cases
of infection would have been expected to occur in the cohort receiving
antibiotic-loaded cement, compared with the number observed. Depending
on the type of antibiotic-loaded cement that is used, its cost in
all primary TKRs ranges between USD $2112.72 and USD $112 606.67
per case of infection that is prevented. Cite this article: