The newer techniques of cementing aim to improve interlock between cement and bone around a femoral stem by combining high pressure and reduced viscosity. This may produce increased embolisation of fat and marrow leading to hypotension, impaired pulmonary gas exchange and death. For this reason the use of high pressures has been questioned.

We compared finger-packing with the use of a cement gun by measuring intramedullary pressures during the cementing of 31 total hip replacements and measuring physiological changes in 19 patients. We also measured pressure in more detail in a laboratory model.

In the clinical series the higher pressures were produced by using a gun, but this caused less physiological disturbance than finger-packing. The laboratory studies showed more consistent results with the gun technique, but for both methods of cementing the highest pressures were generated during the insertion of the stem of the prosthesis.

We performed a randomised prospective trial to compare a cemented unipolar prosthesis (Thompson) with a cemented bipolar prosthesis (Monk) in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip in patients over 80 years of age. Patients with a mental test score of less than 5/13 were excluded but the mortality was still about 30% at one year in both groups. We therefore feel that subjective criteria such as the level of pain and the return to the preinjury state are of paramount importance.

Two years after operation there was no statistical difference between the rate of complications in the two groups. After adjusting for confounding factors such as differences in the level of function before injury between the groups, the degree of return to the preinjury state was significantly greater (p = 0.04) when using the unipolar prosthesis, which is one-quarter of the price of the bipolar.

We cannot therefore justify the use of an expensive bipolar prosthesis in patients over 80 years of age.