Accurate estimations of the risk of fracture due to metastatic bone disease in the femur is essential in order to avoid both under-treatment and over-treatment of patients with an impending pathological fracture. The purpose of the current retrospective in vivo study was to use CT-based finite element analyses (CTFEA) to identify a clear quantitative differentiating factor between patients who are at imminent risk of fracturing their femur and those who are not, and to identify the exact location of maximal weakness where the fracture is most likely to occur. Data were collected on 82 patients with femoral metastatic bone disease, 41 of whom did not undergo prophylactic fixation. A total of 15 had a pathological fracture within six months following the CT scan, and 26 were fracture-free during the five months following the scan. The Mirels score and strain fold ratio (SFR) based on CTFEA was computed for all patients. A SFR value of 1.48 was used as the threshold for a pathological fracture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predicted values for Mirels score and SFR predictions were computed for nine patients who fractured and 24 who did not, as well as a comparison of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC of the ROC curves).Aims
Methods
As tumours of bone and soft tissue are rare, multicentre prospective collaboration is essential for meaningful research and evidence-based advances in patient care. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators encountered in large-scale collaborative research by orthopaedic oncological surgeons involved or interested in prospective multicentre collaboration. All surgeons who were involved, or had expressed an interest, in the ongoing Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumour Surgery (PARITY) trial were invited to participate in a focus group to discuss their experiences with collaborative research in this area. The discussion was digitally recorded, transcribed and anonymised. The transcript was analysed qualitatively, using an analytic approach which aims to organise the data in the language of the participants with little theoretical interpretation.Objectives
Methods
We evaluated the accuracy of augmented reality (AR)-based navigation assistance through simulation of bone tumours in a pig femur model. We developed an AR-based navigation system for bone tumour resection, which could be used on a tablet PC. To simulate a bone tumour in the pig femur, a cortical window was made in the diaphysis and bone cement was inserted. A total of 133 pig femurs were used and tumour resection was simulated with AR-assisted resection (164 resection in 82 femurs, half by an orthropaedic oncology expert and half by an orthopaedic resident) and resection with the conventional method (82 resection in 41 femurs). In the conventional group, resection was performed after measuring the distance from the edge of the condyle to the expected resection margin with a ruler as per routine clinical practice.Objectives
Methods
Adjuvant treatment after intralesional curettage for atypical
cartilaginous tumours (ACTs) of long bones is widely accepted for
extending surgical margins. However, evaluating the isolated effect
of adjuvant treatment is difficult, and it is unclear whether not
using such adjuvants provides poor oncological outcomes. Hence,
we analyzed whether intralesional curettage without cryosurgery
or chemical adjuvants provides poor oncological outcomes in patients
with an ACT. A total of 24 patients (nine men, 15 women) (mean age 45 years;
18 to 62) were treated for ACTs of long bones and followed up for
a median of 66 months (interquartile range 50 to 84). All patients
were treated with extensive manual curettage and limited burring.
Bone cement and grafts were used to fill bone defects in 16 and eight
patients, respectively. No chemical adjuvants or cryosurgery were
used.Aims
Patients and Methods
The April 2015 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: New hope for skull base tumours; Survival but at what cost?; Synovial sarcoma beginning to be cracked?; Wound complications facing soft-tissue sarcoma surgeons; Amputation may offer no survival benefit over reconstruction; Giant cell tumour in the longer term; Intralesional treatment comparable with excision in GCT of the radius?; Imaging prior to oncological referral; And finally…
The August 2015 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Glasgow prognostic score in soft-tissue sarcoma; Denosumab in giant cell tumour; Timing, complications and radiotherapy; Pigmented villonodular synovitis and arthroscopy; PATHFx: estimating survival in pathological cancer; Prosthetic lengthening of short stumps; Chondrosarcoma and pathological fracture
Clinical studies of patients with bone sarcomas have been challenged
by insufficient numbers at individual centres to draw valid conclusions.
Our objective was to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive
multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether
a five-day regimen of post-operative antibiotics, in comparison
to a
24-hour regimen, decreases surgical site infections in patients
undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity primary
bone tumours. We performed a pilot international multi-centre RCT. We used
central randomisation to conceal treatment allocation and sham antibiotics
to blind participants, surgeons, and data collectors. We determined
feasibility by measuring patient enrolment, completeness of follow-up,
and protocol deviations for the antibiotic regimens. Objective
Methods
The clinical utility of routine cross sectional imaging of the
abdomen and pelvis in the screening and surveillance of patients
with primary soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities for metastatic
disease is controversial, based on its questionable yield paired
with concerns regarding the risks of radiation exposure, cost, and
morbidity resulting from false positive findings. Through retrospective review of 140 patients of all ages (mean
53 years; 2 to 88) diagnosed with soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremity
with a mean follow-up of 33 months (0 to 291), we sought to determine
the overall incidence of isolated abdominopelvic metastases, their
temporal relationship to chest involvement, the rate of false positives, and
to identify disparate rates of metastases based on sarcoma subtype.Objectives
Methods
The October 2014 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: how best to reconstruct humeral tumours; not everything is better via the arthroscope; obesity and sarcoma; frozen autograft;
Peri-acetabular tumour resections and their subsequent
reconstruction are among the most challenging procedures in orthopaedic
oncology. Despite the fact that a number of different pelvic endoprostheses
have been introduced, rates of complication remain high and long-term
results are mostly lacking. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the outcome
of reconstructing a peri-acetabular defect with a pedestal cup endoprosthesis
after a type 2 or type 2/3 internal hemipelvectomy. A total of 19 patients (11M:8F) with a mean age of 48 years (14
to 72) were included, most of whom had been treated for a primary
bone tumour (n = 16) between 2003 and 2009. After a mean follow-up
of 39 months (28 days to 8.7 years) seven patients had died. After
a mean follow-up of 7.9 years (4.3 to 10.5), 12 patients were alive,
of whom 11 were disease-free. Complications occurred in 15 patients.
Three had recurrent dislocations and three experienced aseptic loosening.
There were no mechanical failures. Infection occurred in nine patients,
six of whom required removal of the prosthesis. Two patients underwent
hindquarter amputation for local recurrence. The implant survival rate at five years was 50% for all reasons,
and 61% for non-oncological reasons. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor
Society score at final follow-up was 49% (13 to 87). Based on these poor results, we advise caution if using the pedestal
cup for reconstruction of a peri-acetabular tumour resection. Cite this article:
The June 2014 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Infection still a problem in endoprosthetic reconstruction; massive allografts not as successful as we perhaps think; curopsy for aneurysmal bone cysts?; lengthening prosthesis: days are numbered; new WHO classification in brief; proximal tumours and fluid levels: bad news; infection is predictable in orthopaedic oncology; psychosocial support key in oncological outcomes.
Atypical cartilaginous tumours are usually treated
by curettage. The purpose of this study was to show that radiofrequency
ablation was an effective alternative treatment. We enrolled 20 patients (two male, 18 female, mean age 56 years
(36 to 72) in a proof-of-principle study. After inclusion, biopsy
and radiofrequency ablation were performed, followed three months
later by curettage and adjuvant phenolisation. The primary endpoint
was the proportional necrosis in the retrieved material. Secondary endpoints
were correlation with the findings on gadolinium enhanced MRI, functional
outcome and complications. Our results show that 95% to 100% necrosis was obtained in 14
of the 20 patients. MRI had a 91% sensitivity and 67% specificity
for detecting residual tumour after curettage. The mean functional
outcome (MSTS) score six weeks after radiofrequency ablation was
27.1 (23 to 30) compared with 18.1 (12 to 25) after curettage (p
<
0.001). No complications occurred after ablation, while two
patients developed a pathological fracture after curettage. We have shown that radiofrequency ablation is capable of completely
eradicating cartilaginous tumour cells in selective cases. MRI has
a 91% sensitivity for detecting any residual tumour. Radiofrequency
ablation can be performed on an outpatient basis allowing a rapid
return to normal activities. If it can be made more effective, it
has the potential to provide better local control, while improving
functional outcome. Cite this article:
