Total knee replacement (TKR) smart tibial trials
have load-bearing sensors which will show quantitative compartment
pressure values and femoral-tibial tracking patterns. Without smart
trials, surgeons rely on feel and visual estimation of imbalance
to determine if the knee is optimally balanced. Corrective soft-tissue
releases are performed with minimal feedback as to what and how
much should be released. The smart tibial trials demonstrate graphically
where and how much imbalance is present, so that incremental releases
can be performed. The smart tibial trials now also incorporate accelerometers
which demonstrate the axial alignment. This now allows the surgeon
the option to perform a slight recut of the tibia or femur to provide
soft-tissue balance without performing soft-tissue releases. Using
a smart tibial trial to assist with soft-tissue releases or bone
re-cuts, improved patient outcomes have been demonstrated at one
year in a multicentre study of 135 patients (135 knees). Cite this article:
Because posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) resection makes flexion
gaps wider in total knee replacement (TKR), preserving or sacrificing
a PCL affects the gap equivalence; however, there are no criteria
for the PCL resection that consider gap situations of each knee.
This study aims to investigate gap characteristics of knees and
to consider the criteria for PCL resection. The extension and flexion gaps were measured, first with the
PCL preserved and subsequently with the PCL removed (in cases in
which posterior substitute components were selected). The PCL preservation
or sacrifice was solely determined by the gap measurement results,
without considering other functions of the PCL such as ‘roll back.’Objectives
Methods
At least four ways have been described to determine
femoral component rotation, and three ways to determine tibial component
rotation in total knee replacement (TKR). Each method has its advocates
and each has an influence on knee kinematics and the ultimate short
and long term success of TKR. Of the four femoral component methods,
the author prefers rotating the femoral component in flexion to
that amount that establishes a stable symmetrical flexion gap. This
judgement is made after the soft tissues of the knee have been balanced
in extension. Of the three tibial component methods, the author prefers rotating
the tibial component into congruency with the established femoral
component rotation with the knee is in extension. This yields a
rotationally congruent articulation during weight-bearing and should
minimise the torsional forces being transferred through a conforming tibial
insert, which could lead to wear to the underside of the tibial
polyethylene. Rotating platform components will compensate for any
mal-rotation, but can still lead to pain if excessive tibial insert
rotation causes soft-tissue impingement. Cite this article:
Patients with skeletal dysplasia are prone to
developing advanced osteoarthritis of the knee requiring total knee replacement
(TKR) at a younger age than the general population. TKR in this
unique group of patients is a technically demanding procedure owing
to the deformity, flexion contracture, generalised hypotonia and ligamentous
laxity. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 11 TKRs performed
in eight patients with skeletal dysplasia at our institution using
the Stanmore Modular Individualised Lower Extremity System (SMILES)
custom-made rotating-hinge TKR. There were three men and five women
with mean age of 57 years (41 to 79). Patients were followed clinically
and radiologically for a mean of seven years (3 to 11.5). The mean
Knee Society clinical and function scores improved from 24 (14 to
36) and 20 (5 to 40) pre-operatively, respectively, to 68 (28 to
80) and 50 (22 to 74), respectively, at final follow-up. Four complications
were recorded, including a patellar fracture following a fall, a
tibial peri-prosthetic fracture, persistent anterior knee pain,
and aseptic loosening of a femoral component requiring revision.
Our results demonstrate that custom primary rotating-hinge TKR in
patients with skeletal dysplasia is effective at relieving pain,
with a satisfactory range of movement and improved function. It compensates
for bony deformity and ligament deficiency and reduces the likelihood
of corrective osteotomy. Patellofemoral joint complications are
frequent and functional outcome is worse than with primary TKR in
the general population.
We studied the influence of soft-tissue releases and soft-tissue balance on the outcome of 526 total knee replacements one year after operation. The surgery had been performed by seven surgeons in five centres in the United Kingdom between October 1999 and December 2002. Balancing was carried out by five surgeons using spacers and trials and by two surgeons using a ‘balancer’ instrument. All the surgeons assessed the adequacy of their releases by taking measurements with the balancer after soft-tissue release before implanting the components. Independent observers collected the Oxford knee scores and applied the American Knee Society functional and knee scores as well as recording the range of movement of the replaced knee. These were compared with the pre-operative scores and the extent of the releases. We found differences in outcomes between minimal and extensive releases and between balanced and imbalanced knees. Knees requiring extensive soft-tissue releases showed greater change in the short-term clinical outcome without increased complications and achieved similar results at one year compared with those with less deformity pre-operatively which had required less soft-tissue release. Balancing an imbalanced knee improved the short-term knee outcome.
We compared the results of 146 patients who received an anatomic modular knee fixed-bearing total knee replacement (TKR) in one knee and a low contact stress rotating platform mobile-bearing TKR in the other. There were 138 women and eight men with a mean age of 69.8 years (42 to 80). The mean follow-up was 13.2 years (11.0 to 14.5). The patients were assessed clinically and radiologically using the rating systems of the Hospital for Special Surgery and the Knee Society at three months, six months, one year, and annually thereafter. The assessment scores of both rating systems pre-operatively and at the final review did not show any statistically significant differences between the two designs of implant. In the anatomic modular knee group, one knee was revised because of aseptic loosening of the tibial component and one because of infection. In addition, three knees were revised because of wear of the polyethylene tibial bearing. In the low contact stress group, two knees were revised because of instability requiring exchange of the polyethylene insert and one because of infection. The radiological analysis found no statistical difference in the incidence of radiolucent lines at the final review (Student’s We found no evidence of the superiority of one design over the other at long-term follow-up.
