Orientation of the acetabular component influences
wear, range of movement and the incidence of dislocation after total
hip replacement (THR). During surgery, such orientation is often
referenced to the anterior pelvic plane (APP), but APP inclination
relative to the coronal plane (pelvic tilt) varies substantially
between individuals. In contrast, the change in pelvic tilt from
supine to standing (dPT) is small for nearly all individuals. Therefore,
in THR performed with the patient supine and the patient’s coronal
plane parallel to the operating table, we propose that freehand placement
of the acetabular component placement is reliable and reflects standing
(functional) cup position. We examined this hypothesis in 56 hips
in 56 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 61 years (29 to 80) using
three-dimensional CT pelvic reconstructions and standing lateral
pelvic radiographs. We found a low variability of acetabular component
placement, with 46 implants (82%) placed within a combined range
of 30° to 50° inclination and 5° to 25° anteversion. Changing from
the supine to the standing position (analysed in 47 patients) was associated
with an anteversion change <
10° in 45 patients (96%). dPT was
<
10° in 41 patients (87%). In conclusion, supine THR appears
to provide reliable freehand acetabular component placement. In
most patients a small reclination of the pelvis going from supine
to standing causes a small increase in anteversion of the acetabular component Cite this article:
We present the clinical results and survivorship
of consecutive 100 Birmingham Hip Resurfacings in 90 patients at
a minimum follow-up of ten years. All procedures were carried out
by an independent surgeon who commenced a prospective study in 1998.
Patients were assessed clinically using the Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, Short-Form 36, Harris
hip score and University of California, Los Angeles activity score. Radiological
analysis was performed by an independent observer and blood metal
ion levels concentrations were measured at ten years post-operatively
in 62 patients. The median acetabular component inclination was
46.2° (34° to 59°) and anteversion 11.0° (0° to 30°). The median
chromium concentration in the unilateral group was 1.74 (0.41 to
15.23) and for the bilateral group was 2.98 (1.57 to 18.01). The
equivalent values for cobalt were 1.67 (0.54 to 20.4) and 1.88 (1.38
to 19.32). In total there were eight failures giving an overall survival
at ten years of 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 86.7 to 97.3).
BHR in male patients had an improved survivorship of 94.6% (95%
CI 89.4 to 100) compared with females at 84.6% (95% CI 70.7 to 98.5),
but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.119). Four
of the nine BHRs with a bearing diameter of 42 mm failed. The overall results were consistent with data produced from other
centres in that the clinical outcome of large male patients was
extremely encouraging, whereas the survival of the smaller joints
was less satisfactory.
An ongoing prospective study to investigate failing metal-on-metal
hip prostheses was commenced at our centre in 2008. We report on
the results of the analysis of the first consecutive 126 failed
mated total hip prostheses from a single manufacturer. Analysis was carried out using highly accurate coordinate measuring
to calculate volumetric and linear rates of the articular bearing
surfaces and also the surfaces of the taper junctions. The relationship
between taper wear rates and a number of variables, including bearing
diameter and orientation of the acetabular component, was investigated.Objectives
Methods
Malposition of the acetabular component is a risk factor for post-operative dislocation after total hip replacement (THR). We have investigated the influence of the orientation of the acetabular component on the probability of dislocation. Radiological anteversion and abduction of the component of 127 hips which dislocated post-operatively were measured by Einzel-Bild-Röentgen-Analysis and compared with those in a control group of 342 patients. In the control group, the mean value of anteversion was 15° and of abduction 44°. Patients with anterior dislocation after primary THR showed significant differences in the mean angle of anteversion (17°), and abduction (48°) as did patients with posterior dislocation (anteversion 11°, abduction 42°). After revision patients with posterior dislocation showed significant differences in anteversion (12°) and abduction (40°). Our results demonstrate the importance of accurate positioning of the acetabular component in order to reduce the frequency of subsequent dislocations. Radiological anteversion of 15° and abduction of 45° are the lowest at-risk values for dislocation.
