Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. The National Hip Fracture
Audit currently provides a framework for service evaluation. This
evaluation is based upon the assessment of process rather than assessment
of patient-centred outcome and therefore it fails to provide meaningful
data regarding the clinical effectiveness of treatments. This study
aims to capture data from the cohort of patients who present with
a fracture of the proximal femur at a single United Kingdom Major
Trauma Centre. Patient-centred outcomes will be recorded and provide
a baseline cohort within which to test the clinical effectiveness
of experimental interventions.
It is difficult to establish the diagnosis of an injured shoulder if only one radiographic projection is used. We have compared two lateral projections, the Neer trans-scapular and the apical oblique in 80 patients; the radiographs were presented randomly to 10 casualty officers and nine radiologists. The apical oblique view was found to permit more accurate diagnosis of fractures and of dislocation by both groups.
Supracondylar fractures are the most frequently occurring paediatric
fractures about the elbow and may be associated with a neurovascular
injury. The British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma
11 (BOAST 11) guidelines describe best practice for supracondylar
fracture management. This study aimed to assess whether emergency
departments in the United Kingdom adhere to BOAST 11 standard 1:
a documented assessment, performed on presentation, must include
the status of the radial pulse, digital capillary refill time, and
the individual function of the radial, median (including the anterior
interosseous), and ulnar nerves. Stage 1: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective audit of adherence
to BOAST 11 standard 1. Data were collected from eight hospitals
in the United Kingdom. A total of 433 children with Gartland type
2 or 3 supracondylar fractures were eligible for inclusion. A centrally
created data collection sheet was used to guide objective analysis
of whether BOAST 11 standard 1 was adhered to. Stage 2: We created
a quality improvement proforma for use in emergency departments.
This was piloted in one of the hospitals used in the primary audit
and was re-audited using equivalent methodology. In all, 102 patients
presenting between January 2016 and July 2017 were eligible for inclusion
in the re-audit.Aims
Materials and Methods
