Femoral stems with exchangeable (modular) necks were introduced
to offer surgeons an increased choice when determining the version,
offset and length of the femoral neck during total hip arthroplasty
(THA). It was hoped that this would improve outcomes and reduce
complications, particularly dislocation. In 2010, the Australian Orthopaedic
Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) first
reported an increased rate of revision after primary THA using femoral
stems with an exchangeable neck. The aim of this study was to provide
a more comprehensive up-to-date analysis of primary THA using femoral
stems with exchangeable and fixed necks. The data included all primary THA procedures performed for osteoarthritis
(OA), reported to the AOANJRR between 01 September 1999 and 31 December
2014. There were 9289 femoral stems with an exchangeable neck and
253 165 femoral stems with a fixed neck. The characteristics of
the patients and prostheses including the bearing surface and stem/neck
metal combinations were examined using Cox proportional hazard ratios
(HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship. Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare early functional and health
related quality of life outcomes (HRQoL) in patients who have undergone
total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a bone conserving short stem
femoral component and those in whom a conventional length uncemented
component was used. Outcome was assessed using a validated performance
based outcome instrument as well as patient reported outcome measures
(PROMs). We prospectively analysed 33 patients whose THA involved a contemporary
proximally porous coated tapered short stem femoral component and
53 patients with a standard conventional femoral component, at a
minimum follow-up of two years. The mean follow-up was 31.4 months
(24 to 39). Patients with poor proximal femoral bone quality were
excluded. The mean age of the patients was 66.6 years (59 to 77)
and the mean body mass index was 30.2 kg/m2 (24.1 to
41.0). Outcome was assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and
the University College Hospital (UCH) hip score which is a validated
performance based instrument. HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQol
5D (EQ-5D).Aims
Patients and Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a potential treatment
for isolated bone on bone osteoarthritis when limited to a single
compartment. The risk for revision of UKA is three times higher
than for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this review was
to discuss the different revision options after UKA failure. A search was performed for English language articles published
between 2006 and 2016. After reviewing titles and abstracts, 105
papers were selected for further analysis. Of these, 39 papers were
deemed to contain clinically relevant data to be included in this review.Objectives
Materials and Methods
Revision of a cemented hemiarthroplasty of the
hip may be a hazardous procedure with high rates of intra-operative complications.
Removing well-fixed cement is time consuming and risks damaging
already weak bone or perforating the femoral shaft. The cement-in-cement
method avoids removal of intact cement and has shown good results
when used for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The use of
this technique for the revision of a hemiarthroplasty to THA has
not been previously reported. A total of 28 consecutive hemiarthroplasties (in 28 patients)
were revised to a THA using an Exeter stem and the cement-in-cement
technique. There were four men and 24 women; their mean age was
80 years (35 to 93). Clinical and radiographic data, as well as
operative notes, were collected prospectively and no patient was
lost to follow-up. Four patients died within two years of surgery. The mean follow
up of the remainder was 70 months (25 to 124). Intra-operatively
there was one proximal perforation, one crack of the
femoral calcar and one acetabular fracture. No femoral components
have required subsequent revision for aseptic loosening or are radiologically loose. Four patients with late complications (14%) have since undergone
surgery (two for a peri-prosthetic fracture, and one each for deep
infection and recurrent dislocation) resulting in an overall major
rate of complication of 35.7%. The cement-in-cement technique provides reliable femoral fixation
in this elderly population and may reduce operating time and rates
of complication. Cite this article:
Worldwide rates of primary and revision total
knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rising due to increased longevity of
the population and the burden of osteoarthritis. Revision TKA is a technically demanding procedure generating
outcomes which are reported to be inferior to those of primary knee
arthroplasty, and with a higher risk of complication. Overall, the
rate of revision after primary arthroplasty is low, but the number
of patients currently living with a TKA suggests a large potential
revision healthcare burden. Many patients are now outliving their prosthesis, and consideration
must be given to how we are to provide the necessary capacity to
meet the rising demand for revision surgery and how to maximise
patient outcomes. The purpose of this review was to examine the epidemiology of,
and risk factors for, revision knee arthroplasty, and to discuss
factors that may enhance patient outcomes. Cite this article:
Since redesign of the Oxford phase III mobile-bearing unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty (UKA) femoral component to a twin-peg design,
there has not been a direct comparison to total knee arthroplasty
(TKA). Thus, we explored differences between the two cohorts. A total of 168 patients (201 knees) underwent medial UKA with
the Oxford Partial Knee Twin-Peg. These patients were compared with
a randomly selected group of 177 patients (189 knees) with primary
Vanguard TKA. Patient demographics, Knee Society (KS) scores and
range of movement (ROM) were compared between the two cohorts. Additionally,
revision, re-operation and manipulation under anaesthesia rates
were analysed.Aims
Patients and Methods
Periprosthetic fracture (PF) after primary total hip arthroplasty
(THA) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication. This
study aims to investigate the influence of cemented stem designs
on the risk of needing a revision for a PF. We analysed data on 257 202 primary THAs with cemented stems
and 390 linked first revisions for PF recorded in the National Joint
Registry (NJR) of England, Wales and Northern Ireland to determine
if a cemented femoral stem brand was associated with the risk of
having revision for a PF after primary THA. All cemented femoral
stem brands with more than 10 000 primary operations recorded in
the NJR were identified. The four most commonly used cemented femoral
stems were the Exeter V40 (n = 146 409), CPT (n = 24 300), C-Stem
(n = 15 113) and Charnley (n = 20 182). We compared the revision risk ratios due to PF amongst the stems
using a Poisson regression model adjusting for patient factors.
Compared with the Exeter V40, the age, gender and ASA grade adjusted
revision rate ratio was 3.89 for the cemented CPT stem (95% confidence
interval (CI) 3.07 to 4.93), 0.89 for the C-Stem (95% CI 0.57 to
1.41) and 0.41 for the Charnley stem (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70).Aims
Patients and Methods
In this study, we evaluated patient-reported
outcomes, the rate of revision and the indications for revision
following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in patients
with osteoarthritis. All patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary resurfacing
hemiarthroplasty and reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty
Registry (DSR), between January 2006 and December 2010 were included.
There were 772 patients (837 arthroplasties) in the study. The Western
Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index was used to
evaluate patient-reported outcome 12 months (10 to 14) post-operatively.
The rates of revision were calculated from the revisions reported
to the DSR up to December 2011 and by checking deaths with the Danish National
Register of Persons. A complete questionnaire was returned by 688 patients (82.2%).
The mean WOOS was 67 (0 to 100). A total of 63 hemiarthroplasties
(7.5%) required revision; the cumulative five-year rate of revision
was 9.9%. Patients aged <
55 years had a statistically significant
inferior WOOS score, which exceeded the minimal clinically important
difference, compared with older patients (mean difference 14.2 (8.8;
95% CI 19.6; p <
0.001), but with no increased risk of revision.
There was no significant difference in the mean WOOS or the risk
of revision between designs of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty. Cite this article:
We evaluated the duration of hospitalisation,
occurrence of infections, hip dislocations, revisions, and mortality following
primary hip and knee replacement in 857 patients with Parkinson’s
disease and compared them with 2571 matched control patients. The
data were collected from comprehensive nationwide Finnish health
registers. The mean follow-up was six years (1 to 13). The patients
with Parkinson’s disease had a longer mean length of stay (21 days
[1 to 365] Cite this article:
We present the medium-term clinical results of a reverse total
shoulder arthroplasty with a trabecular metal glenoid base plate. We reviewed 125 consecutive primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasties
(RTSA) implanted in 124 patients for rotator cuff arthropathy. There
were 100 women and 24 men in the study group with a mean age of
76 years (58 to 89). The mean follow-up was 32 months (24 to 60).
No patient was lost to follow-up.Aim
Patients and Methods
The April 2013 Knee Roundup360 looks at: graft tension and outcome; chondrocytes at the midterm; pre-operative deformity and failure; the designer effect; whether chondroitin sulphate really does work; whether ACL reconstruction is really required; analgesia after TKR; and degenerative meniscus.
We explored the literature surrounding whether
allergy and hypersensitivity has a clinical basis for implant selection
in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In error, the terms hypersensitivity
and allergy are often used synonymously. Although a relationship
is present, we could not find any evidence of implant failure due
to allergy. There is however increasing basic science that suggests
a link between loosening and metal ion production. This is not an
allergic response but is a potential problem. With a lack of evidence
logically there can be no justification to use ‘hypoallergenic’
implants in patients who have pre-existing skin sensitivity to the
metals used in TKA. Cite this article:
Not all questions can be answered by prospective randomised controlled trials. Registries were introduced as a way of collecting information on joint replacements at a population level. They have helped to identify failing implants and the data have also been used to monitor the performance of individual surgeons. This review aims to look at some of the less well known registries that are currently being used worldwide, including those kept on knee ligaments, ankle arthroplasty, fractures and trauma.
We are entering a new era with governmental bodies
taking an increasingly guiding role, gaining control of registries,
demanding direct access with release of open public information
for quality comparisons between hospitals. This review is written
by physicians and scientists who have worked with the Swedish Knee
Arthroplasty Register (SKAR) periodically since it began. It reviews
the history of the register and describes the methods used and lessons
learned. Cite this article:
The December 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Albumin and complications in knee arthroplasty; Tantalum: a knee fixation for all seasons?; Dynamic knee alignment; Tibial component design in UKA; Managing the tidal wave of revision knee arthroplasty; Scoring pain in TKR; Does anyone have a ‘normal’ tibial slope?; XLPE in TKR? A five-year clinical study; Spacers and infected revision arthroplasties; Dialysis and arthroplasty
The October 2015 Hip &
Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Smoking and complications in arthroplasty; Smoking cessation beneficial in arthroplasty; Intermediate care and arthroplasty; Do we still need cell salvage?; Femoroacetabular impingement in the Japanese population; Trunnionosis or taperosis and geometry; Decontamination for staphylococcus aureus works!; Policeman or opportunity? Quality improvement with registries; Death rates higher in readmission to other hospitals
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a cost effective
and extremely successful operation. As longevity increases, the demand
for primary TKA will continue to rise. The success and survivorship
of TKAs are dependent on the demographics of the patient, surgical
technique and implant-related factors. Currently the risk of failure of a TKA requiring revision surgery
ten years post-operatively is 5%. The most common indications for revision include aseptic loosening
(29.8%), infection (14.8%), and pain (9.5%). Revision surgery poses
considerable clinical burdens on patients and financial burdens
on healthcare systems. We present a current concepts review on the epidemiology of failed
TKAs using data from worldwide National Joint Registries. Cite this article:
