Periprosthetic hip-joint infection is a multifaceted and highly detrimental outcome for patients and clinicians. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection reported within two years of primary hip arthroplasty ranges from 0.8% to 2.1%. Costs of treatment are over five-times greater in people with periprosthetic hip joint infection than in those with no infection. Currently, there are no national evidence-based guidelines for treatment and management of this condition to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. The aim of this study is to develop guidelines based on evidence from the six-year INFection and ORthopaedic Management (INFORM) research programme. We used a consensus process consisting of an evidence review to generate items for the guidelines and online consensus questionnaire and virtual face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the guidelines.Aims
Methods
With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty (THA), one of the major challenges is the management of proximal femoral bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) has already been popularized for tumour surgeries. Our aim was to describe the outcome of using PFA in these demanding non-neoplastic cases. A retrospective review of 25 patients who underwent PFA for non-neoplastic indications between January 2009 and December 2015 was undertaken. Their clinical and radiological outcome, complication rates, and survival were recorded. All patients had the Stanmore Implant – Modular Endo-prosthetic Tumour System (METS).Aims
Methods
We report the five year outcomes of a two-stage
approach for infected total hip replacement. This is a single-surgeon
experience at a tertiary centre where the more straightforward cases
are treated using single-stage exchange. This study highlights the
vital role of the multidisciplinary team in managing these cases. A total of 125 patients (51 male, 74 female) with a mean age
of 68 years (42 to 78) were reviewed prospectively. Functional status
was assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean HHS improved
from 38 (6 to 78.5) pre-operatively to 81.2 (33 to 98) post-operatively.
Staphylococcus species were isolated in 85 patients (68%). The rate of control of infection was 96% at five years. In all,
19 patients died during the period of the study. This represented
a one year mortality of 0.8% and an overall mortality of 15.2% at
five years. No patients were lost to follow-up. We report excellent control of infection in a series of complex
patients and infections using a two-stage revision protocol supported
by a multidisciplinary approach. The reason for the high rate of
mortality in these patients is not known. Cite this article:
Based on the first implementation of mixing antibiotics
into bone cement in the 1970s, the Endo-Klinik has used one stage
exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in over 85% of cases.
Looking carefully at current literature and guidelines for PJI treatment,
there is no clear evidence that a two stage procedure has a higher
success rate than a one-stage approach. A cemented one-stage exchange
potentially offers certain advantages, mainly based on the need
for only one operative procedure, reduced antibiotics and hospitalisation time.
In order to fulfill a one-stage approach, there are obligatory pre-,
peri- and post-operative details that need to be meticulously respected,
and are described in detail. Essential pre-operative diagnostic
testing is based on the joint aspiration with an exact identification
of any bacteria. The presence of a positive bacterial culture and
respective antibiogram are essential, to specify the antibiotics
to be loaded to the bone cement, which allows a high local antibiotic
elution directly at the surgical side. A specific antibiotic treatment
plan is generated by a microbiologist. The surgical success relies
on the complete removal of all pre-existing hardware, including
cement and restrictors and an aggressive and complete debridement
of any infected soft tissues and bone material. Post-operative systemic
antibiotic administration is usually completed after only ten to
14 days. Cite this article:
Despite the worldwide usage of the cemented Contemporary
acetabular component (Stryker), no published data are available
regarding its use in patients aged <
50 years. We undertook a
mid- to long-term follow-up study, including all consecutive patients
aged
<
50 years who underwent a primary total hip replacement using
the Contemporary acetabular component with the Exeter cemented stem
between January 1999 and January 2006. There were 152 hips in 126
patients, 61 men and 65 women, mean age at surgery 37.6 years (16
to 49 yrs). One patient was lost to follow-up. Mean clinical follow-up of all implants was 7.6 years (0.9 to
12.0). All clinical questionnaire scores, including Harris hip score,
Oxford hip score and several visual analogue scales, were found
to have improved. The eight year survivorship of all acetabular
components for the endpoints revision for any reason or revision
for aseptic loosening was 94.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 89.2
to 97.2) and 96.4% (95% CI 91.6 to 98.5), respectively. Radiological follow-up
was complete for 146 implants. The eight year survival for the endpoint
radiological loosening was 93.1% (95% CI 86.2 to 96.6). Three surviving
implants were considered radiologically loose but were asymptomatic.
The presence of acetabular osteolysis (n = 17, 11.8%) and radiolucent
lines (n = 20, 13.9%) in the 144 surviving cups indicates a need
for continued observation in the second decade of follow-up in order
to observe their influence on long-term survival. The clinical and radiological data resulting in a ten-year survival
rate >
90% in young patients support the use of the Contemporary
acetabular component in this specific patient group. Cite this article:
