Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, to establish whether differences arise in clinical outcomes between autologous and synthetic bone grafts in the operative management of tibial plateau fractures. A structured search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the online archives of Bone & Joint Publishing, and CENTRAL databases from inception until 28 July 2021 was performed. Randomized, controlled, clinical trials that compared autologous and synthetic bone grafts in tibial plateau fractures were included. Preclinical studies, clinical studies in paediatric patients, pathological fractures, fracture nonunion, or chondral defects were excluded. Outcome data were assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) framework and synthesized in random-effect meta-analysis. The Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidance was followed throughout.Aims
Methods
Deep bone and joint infections (DBJI) are directly intertwined with health, demographic change towards an elderly population, and wellbeing. The elderly human population is more prone to acquire infections, and the consequences such as pain, reduced quality of life, morbidity, absence from work and premature retirement due to disability place significant burdens on already strained healthcare systems and societal budgets. DBJIs are less responsive to systemic antibiotics because of poor vascular perfusion in necrotic bone, large bone defects and persistent biofilm-based infection. Emerging bacterial resistance poses a major threat and new innovative treatment modalities are urgently needed to curb its current trajectory. We present a new biphasic ceramic bone substitute consisting of hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate for local antibiotic delivery in combination with bone regeneration. Gentamicin release was measured in four setups: 1) Objectives
Materials and Methods
A total of 20 patients with a depressed fracture
of the lateral tibial plateau (Schatzker II or III) who would undergo open
reduction and internal fixation were randomised to have the metaphyseal
void in the bone filled with either porous titanium granules or
autograft bone. Radiographs were undertaken within one week, after
six weeks, three months, six months, and after 12 months. The primary outcome measure was recurrent depression of the joint
surface: a secondary outcome was the duration of surgery. The risk of recurrent depression of the joint surface was lower
(p <
0.001) and the operating time less (p <
0.002) when titanium
granules were used. The indication is that it is therefore beneficial to use porous
titanium granules than autograft bone to fill the void created by
reducing a depressed fracture of the lateral tibial plateau. There
is no donor site morbidity, the operating time is shorter and the
risk of recurrent depression of the articular surface is less. Cite this article:
