The aim of this study was to conduct a cross-sectional, observational cohort study of patients presenting for revision of a total hip, or total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, to understand current routes to revision surgery and explore differences in symptoms, healthcare use, reason for revision, and the revision surgery (surgical time, components, length of stay) between patients having regular follow-up and those without. Data were collected from participants and medical records for the 12 months prior to revision. Patients with previous revision, metal-on-metal articulations, or hip hemiarthroplasty were excluded. Participants were retrospectively classified as ‘Planned’ or ‘Unplanned’ revision. Multilevel regression and propensity score matching were used to compare the two groups.Aims
Methods
We investigated changes in the axial alignment of the ipsilateral
hip and knee after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We reviewed 152 patients undergoing primary THA (163 hips; 22
hips in men, 141 hips in women) without a pre-operative flexion
contracture. The mean age was 64 years (30 to 88). The diagnosis
was osteoarthritis (OA) in 151 hips (primary in 18 hips, and secondary
to dysplasia in 133) and non-OA in 12 hips. A posterolateral approach
with repair of the external rotators was used in 134 hips and an
anterior approach in 29 hips. We measured changes in leg length
and offset on radiographs, and femoral anteversion, internal rotation
of the hip and lateral patellar tilt on CT scans, pre- and post-operatively. Aims
Patients and Methods
Obtaining a balanced flexion gap with correct
femoral component rotation is one of the prerequisites for a successful
outcome after total knee replacement (TKR). Different techniques
for achieving this have been described. In this study we prospectively
compared gap-balancing Both groups systematically reproduced a similar external rotation
of the femoral component relative to the surgical transepicondylar
axis: 2.4°
