Iliosacral sarcoma resections have been shown to have high rates of local recurrence (LR) and poor overall survival. There is also no universal classification for the resection of pelvic sarcomas invading the sacrum. This study proposes a novel classification system and analyzes the survival and risk of recurrence, when using this system. This is a retrospective analysis of 151 patients (with median follow-up in survivors of 44 months (interquartile range 12 to 77)) who underwent hemipelvectomy with iliosacral resection at a single centre between 2007 and 2019. The proposed classification differentiates the extent of iliosacral resection and defines types S1 to S6 (S1 resection medial and parallel to the sacroiliac joint, S2 resection through the ipsilateral sacral lateral mass to the neuroforamina, S3 resection through the ipsilateral neuroforamina, S4 resection through ipsilateral the spinal canal, and S5 and S6 contralateral sacral resections). Descriptive statistics and the chi-squared test were used for categorical variables, and the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed.Aims
Methods
Orthopaedic and reconstructive surgeons are faced with large defects after the resection of malignant tumours of the sacrum. Spinopelvic reconstruction is advocated for resections above the level of the S1 neural foramina or involving the sacroiliac joint. Fixation may be augmented with either free vascularized fibular flaps (FVFs) or allograft fibular struts (AFSs) in a cathedral style. However, there are no studies comparing these reconstructive techniques. We reviewed 44 patients (23 female, 21 male) with a mean age of 40 years (SD 17), who underwent en bloc sacrectomy for a malignant tumour of the sacrum with a reconstruction using a total (n = 20), subtotal (n = 2), or hemicathedral (n = 25) technique. The reconstructions were supplemented with a FVF in 25 patients (57%) and an AFS in 19 patients (43%). The mean length of the strut graft was 13 cm (SD 4). The mean follow-up was seven years (SD 5).Aims
Methods
The sacrum is frequently invaded by a pelvic tumour. The aim
of this study was to review our experience of treating this group
of patients and to identify the feasibility of a new surgical classification
in the management of these tumours. We reviewed 141 patients who, between 2005 and 2014, had undergone
surgical excision of a pelvic tumour with invasion of the sacrum. In a new classification, pelvisacral (Ps) I, II, and III resections
refer to a sagittal osteotomy through the ipsilateral wing of the
sacrum, through the sacral midline, or lateral to the contralateral
sacral foramina, respectively. A Ps a resection describes a pelvic
osteotomy through the ilium and a Ps b resection describes a concurrent
resection of the acetabulum with osteotomies performed through the
pubis and ischium or the pubic symphysis. Within each type, surgical
approaches were standardized to guide resection of the tumour.Aims
Patients and Methods
We report our experience of using a computer
navigation system to aid resection of malignant musculoskeletal tumours
of the pelvis and limbs and, where appropriate, their subsequent
reconstruction. We also highlight circumstances in which navigation
should be used with caution. We resected a musculoskeletal tumour from 18 patients (15 male,
three female, mean age of 30 years (13 to 75) using commercially
available computer navigation software (Orthomap 3D) and assessed
its impact on the accuracy of our surgery. Of nine pelvic tumours,
three had a biological reconstruction with extracorporeal irradiation,
four underwent endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) and two required
no bony reconstruction. There were eight tumours of the bones of
the limbs. Four diaphyseal tumours underwent biological reconstruction.
Two patients with a sarcoma of the proximal femur and two with a
sarcoma of the proximal humerus underwent extra-articular resection
and, where appropriate, EPR. One soft-tissue sarcoma of the adductor
compartment which involved the femur was resected and reconstructed
using an EPR. Computer navigation was used to aid reconstruction
in eight patients. Histological examination of the resected specimens revealed tumour-free
margins in all patients. Post-operative radiographs and CT showed
that the resection and reconstruction had been carried out as planned
in all patients where navigation was used. In two patients, computer
navigation had to be abandoned and the operation was completed under
CT and radiological control. The use of computer navigation in musculoskeletal oncology allows
accurate identification of the local anatomy and can define the
extent of the tumour and proposed resection margins. Furthermore,
it helps in reconstruction of limb length, rotation and overall
alignment after resection of an appendicular tumour. Cite this article:
Giant cell tumour is the most common aggressive
benign tumour of the musculoskeletal system and has a high rate of
local recurrence. When it occurs in proximity to the hip, reconstruction
of the joint is a challenge. Options for reconstruction after wide
resection include the use of a megaprosthesis or an allograft-prosthesis
composite. We performed a clinical and radiological study to evaluate
the functional results of a proximal femoral allograft-prosthesis
composite in the treatment of proximal femoral giant cell tumour
after wide resection. This was an observational study, between 2006
and 2012, of 18 patients with a mean age of 32 years (28 to 42)
and a mean follow-up of 54 months (18 to 79). We achieved excellent
outcomes using Harris Hip Score in 13 patients and a good outcome
in five. All allografts united. There were no complications such
as infection, failure, fracture or resorption of the graft, or recurrent
tumour. Resection and reconstruction of giant cell tumours with
proximal femoral allograft–prosthesis composite is a better option
than using a prosthesis considering preservation of bone stock and excellent
restoration of function. A good result requires demanding bone banking techniques, effective
measures to prevent infection and stability at the allograft-host
junction. Cite this article:
We report our early experience with the use of
a new prosthesis, the Modular Hemipelvic Prosthesis II, for reconstruction
of the hemipelvis after resection of a primary malignant peri-acetabular
tumour involving the sacroiliac joint. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 17 patients who had
undergone resection of a pelvic tumour and reconstruction with this
prosthesis between July 2002 and July 2010. One patient had a type I+II+III+IV resection (ilium + peri-acetabulum
+ pubis/ischium + sacrum) and 16 had a type I+II+IV resection (ilium
+ acetabulum + sacrum). The outcome was assessed at a mean follow-up
of 33 months (15 to 59). One patient was alive with disease, 11
were alive without disease and five had died of disease. The overall
five-year survival rate was 62.4%. Six patients had a local recurrence.
The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 58% (33 to 77).
Deep infection occurred in two patients, problems with wound healing
in five and dislocation in one. For patients with a primary malignant peri-acetabular sarcoma
involving the sacroiliac joint, we believe that this new prosthesis
is a viable option for reconstruction of the bony defect left following
resection of the tumour. It results in a satisfactory functional
outcome with an acceptable rate of complications. Cite this article:
We present a retrospective study of patients suffering from a variety of benign tumours in whom external fixators were used to treat deformity and limb-length discrepancy, and for the reconstruction of bone defects. A total of 43 limbs in 31 patients (12 male and 19 female) with a mean age of 14 years (2 to 54) were treated. The diagnosis was Ollier’s disease in 12 limbs, fibrous dysplasia in 11, osteochondroma in eight, giant cell tumour in five, osteofibrous dysplasia in five and non-ossifying fibroma in two. The lesions were treated in the tibia in 19 limbs, in the femur in 16, and in the forearm in eight. The Ilizarov frame was used in 25 limbs, the Taylor Spatial Frame in seven, the Orthofix fixator in six, the Monotube in four and the Heidelberg fixator in one. The mean follow-up was 72 months (22 to 221). The mean external fixation period was 168 days (71 to 352). The mean external fixation index was 42 days/cm (22.2 to 102.0) in the 22 patients who required limb lengthening. The mean correction angle for those with angular deformity was 23° (7° to 45°). At final follow-up all patients had returned to normal activities. Four patients required a second operation for recurrent deformity of further limb lengthening. Local recurrence occurred in one patient, requiring further surgery.
