We present the electromyographic (EMG) results
ten years after open decompression of the median nerve at the wrist
and compare them with the clinical and functional outcomes as judged
by Levine’s Questionnaire. This retrospective study evaluated 115
patients who had undergone carpal tunnel decompression at a mean
of 10.47 years (9.24 to 11.36) previously. A positive EMG diagnosis
was found in 77 patients (67%), including those who were asymptomatic
at ten years. It is necessary to include both clinical and functional results
as well as electromyographic testing in the long-term evaluation
of patients who have undergone carpal tunnel decompression particularly
in those in whom revision surgery is being considered. In doubtful
cases or when there are differing outcomes, self-administered scales
such as Levine’s Questionnaire should prevail over EMG results when
deciding on the need for revision surgery.
Diabetes mellitus is recognised as a risk factor
for carpal tunnel syndrome. The response to treatment is unclear,
and may be poorer than in non-diabetic patients. Previous randomised
studies of interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome have specifically
excluded diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to investigate
the epidemiology of carpal tunnel syndrome in diabetic patients,
and compare the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression with non-diabetic
patients. The primary endpoint was improvement in the QuickDASH
score. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 11.3% (176 of 1564).
Diabetic patients were more likely to have severe neurophysiological
findings at presentation. Patients with diabetes had poorer QuickDASH
scores at one year post-operatively (p = 0.028), although the mean
difference was lower than the minimal clinically important difference
for this score. After controlling for underlying differences in
age and gender, there was no difference between groups in the magnitude of
improvement after decompression (p = 0.481). Patients with diabetes
mellitus can therefore be expected to enjoy a similar improvement
in function.
The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) may be used to decide whether to perform amputation in patients with injuries involving a limb. A score of 7 points or higher indicates the need for amputation. We have treated three patients with a MESS of 7 points or higher, in two of which the injured limb was salvaged. This scoring system was originally devised to assess injuries to the lower limb. However, a MESS of 7 points as a justification for amputation does not appear appropriate when assessing injuries to the major vessels in the upper limb.
We describe 20 patients, aged between 43 and 88 years, with delayed nerve palsy or deepening of an initial palsy caused by arterial injury from low-energy injuries to the shoulder. The onset of palsy ranged from immediately after the injury to four months later. There was progression in all the patients with an initial partial nerve palsy. Pain was severe in 18 patients, in 16 of whom it presented as neurostenalgia and in two as causalgia. Dislocation of the shoulder or fracture of the proximal humerus occurred in 16 patients. There was soft-tissue crushing in two and prolonged unconsciousness from alcoholic intoxication in another two. Decompression of the plexus and repair of the arterial injury brought swift relief from pain in all the patients. Nerve recovery was generally good, but less so in neglected cases. The interval from injury to the repair of the vessels ranged from immediately afterwards to 120 days. Delayed onset of nerve palsy or deepening of a nerve lesion is caused by bleeding and/or impending critical
