Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 6 | Pages 5 - 11
1 Dec 2020
Sharma V Turmezei T Wain J McNamara I


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 3 - 8
1 Dec 2019
Pulido PG Donell S McNamara I


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 5 | Pages 4 - 10
1 Oct 2019
Tsoi K Samuel A Jeys LM Ashford RU Gregory JJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 6
1 Feb 2017
Horn A Eastwood D


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 4 | Pages 4 - 15
1 Aug 2016
Sehat K

Anatomical total knee arthroplasty alignment versus conventional mechanical alignment; or a combination?


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 8
1 Feb 2016
Bryson D Shivji F Price K Lawniczak D Chell J Hunter J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 5 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Oct 2015
Clark GW Wood DJ

The use of robotics in arthroplasty surgery is expanding rapidly as improvements in the technology evolve. This article examines current evidence to justify the usage of robotics, as well as the future potential in this emerging field.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 3 | Pages 9 - 13
1 Jun 2014
Waterson HB Philips JRA Mandalia VI Toms AD

Mechanical alignment has been a fundamental tenet of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) since modern knee replacement surgery was developed in the 1970s. The objective of mechanical alignment was to infer the greatest biomechanical advantage to the implant to prevent early loosening and failure. Over the last 40 years a great deal of innovation in TKA technology has been focusing on how to more accurately achieve mechanical alignment. Recently the concept of mechanical alignment has been challenged, and other alignment philosophies are being explored with the intention of trying to improve patient outcomes following TKA.

This article examines the evolution of the mechanical alignment concept and whether there are any viable alternatives.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 5 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Oct 2012
Belmont Jr PJ Hetz S Potter BK

We live in troubled times. Increased opposition reliance on explosive devices, the widespread use of individual and vehicular body armour, and the improved survival of combat casualties have created many complex musculoskeletal injuries in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Explosive mechanisms of injury account for 75% of all musculoskeletal combat casualties. Throughout all the echelons of care medical staff practice consistent treatment strategies of damage control orthopaedics including tourniquets, antibiotics, external fixation, selective amputations and vacuum-assisted closure. Complications, particularly infection and heterotopic ossification, remain frequent, and re-operations are common. Meanwhile, non-combat musculoskeletal casualties are three times more frequent than those derived from combat and account for nearly 50% of all musculoskeletal casualties requiring evacuation from the combat zone.