The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) was introduced in 1997 to address the needs of young active patients using a historically proven large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing. A single designer surgeon’s consecutive series of 130 patients (144 hips) was previously reported at five and ten years, reporting three and ten failures, respectively. The aim of this study was to extend the follow-up of this original cohort at 25 years. The study extends the reporting on the first consecutive 144 resurfacing procedures in 130 patients for all indications. All operations were undertaken between August 1997 and May 1998. The mean age at operation was 52.1 years (SD 9.93; 17 to 76), and included 37 female patients (28.5%). Failure was defined as revision of either component for any reason. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Routine follow-up with serum metal ion levels, radiographs, and Oxford Hip Scores (OHSs) was undertaken.Aims
Methods
Drawing upon a total experience of 450 hips affected by established congenital dislocation or subluxation, the author presents the long-term results in 177 hips treated for the first time between the ages of nine months and three and a half years, in support of his contention that surgical endeavour should in the first place be directed towards the limbus and upper end of femur rather than the acetabulum. The 144 patients, all treated on lines previously described in this journal (Scott 1953; Somerville 1953a, b; Somerville and Scott 1957), have now been followed up annually for between ten and
1. A review of 204 cases of prolapsed intervertebral disc treated by the author by operation ten to
Thirty years' experience of excision of the trapezium for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint has shown that this simple operation is entirely satisfactory.
1. During the past
1. Almost all patients with osteoarthritis of the hip who consult the surgeon do so because they wish to be relieved of pain. They all have limitation of movement in varying degrees but most of them will be either unaware of it or will have accepted it. What is more important, they would not have sought medical advice because of stiffness if there had been no pain. The primary objective of operative treatment must therefore be to relieve pain. 2. Displacement osteotomy will give substantial relief from pain in a high proportion of cases and the relief is lasting. Perhaps that explains why this operation, advocated by McMurray and Malkin
A review of fifty cases of idiopathic pseudocoxalgia (Legg-CalveÌ-Perthes disease) followed into adult life for periods of eleven to thirty years (average seventeen years) after diagnosis shows:. 1. In the whole series rather more than one-third of the patients developed hips which were normal or nearly normal. 2. An equal number had hips which could only have been considered "fair.". 3. About one quarter had hips which gave pain and which showed marked loss of movement and gross degenerative changes radiologically. Judged from the point of view of symptoms, the results were better than the foregoing would suggest. Three-quarters of the patients were fully active and free from pain but only two-fifths had hips which were radiologically good. It is possible that such apparently good results are unlikely to be permanent, and I hope, therefore, to continue this follow-up for another ten or fifteen years. It can, however, be concluded at this stage that an immediate good result is likely to be maintained at least until the age of
1. This is a simple clinical study of the end-results of arthrodesis of the hip joint in patients followed up and re-examined five to
1. Arthroplasty of the knee joint should be performed only in carefully selected cases. Criteria for the operation are outlined. 2. In our experience, 70 per cent. of properly selected patients secure good or fair results. An additional 12 per cent., whose anatomical or functional results were classified as poor, preferred the movement which had been gained to ankylosis of the joint. 3. The major functional adaptation of the knee joint takes place during the first five years after arthroplasty. Several patients who had a poor range of movement after one or two years developed an excellent range by the end of five years. 4. Instability, when present, usually became apparent within the first five years. 5. Joints which were still stable at the end of five years usually remained so over a long period of time. Four patients have been traced for twenty to