Periprosthetic fracture and implant loosening are two of the major reasons for revision surgery of cementless implants. Optimal implant fixation with minimal bone damage is challenging in this procedure. This pilot study investigates whether vibratory implant insertion is gentler compared to consecutive single blows for acetabular component implantation in a surrogate polyurethane (PU) model. Acetabular components (cups) were implanted into 1 mm nominal under-sized cavities in PU foams (15 and 30 per cubic foot (PCF)) using a vibratory implant insertion device and an automated impaction device for single blows. The impaction force, remaining polar gap, and lever-out moment were measured and compared between the impaction methods.Aims
Methods
Few studies have assessed outcomes following non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (non-MoMHA) revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD). We assessed outcomes following non-MoMHA revision surgery performed for ARMD, and identified predictors of re-revision. We performed a retrospective observational study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. All non-MoMHAs undergoing revision surgery for ARMD between 2008 and 2014 were included (185 hips in 185 patients). Outcome measures following ARMD revision were intra-operative complications, mortality and re-revision surgery. Predictors of re-revision were identified using Cox regression.Objectives
Methods
There are several reports clarifying successful results following
open reduction using Ludloff’s medial approach for congenital (CDH)
or developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH). This study aimed
to reveal the long-term post-operative course until the period of
hip-joint maturity after the conventional surgical treatments. A long-term follow-up beyond the age of hip-joint maturity was
performed for 115 hips in 103 patients who underwent open reduction
using Ludloff’s medial approach in our hospital. The mean age at
surgery was 8.5 months (2 to 26) and the mean follow-up was 20.3
years (15 to 28). The radiological condition at full growth of the hip
joint was evaluated by Severin’s classification.Objectives
Methods
