External fixators are the traditional fixation method of choice for contaminated open fractures. However, patient acceptance is low due to the high profile and therefore physical burden of the constructs. An externalised locking compression plate is a low profile alternative. However, the biomechanical differences have not been assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the axial and torsional stiffness of the externalised titanium locking compression plate (ET-LCP), the externalised stainless steel locking compression plate (ESS-LCP) and the unilateral external fixator (UEF). A fracture gap model was created to simulate comminuted mid-shaft tibia fractures using synthetic composite bones. Fifteen constructs were stabilised with ET-LCP, ESS-LCP or UEF (five constructs each). The constructs were loaded under both axial and torsional directions to determine construct stiffness.Objectives
Methods
Because of the contradictory body of evidence related to the
potential benefits of helical blades in trochanteric fracture fixation,
we studied the effect of bone compaction resulting from the insertion
of a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). We developed a subject-specific computational model of a trochanteric
fracture (31-A2 in the AO classification) with lack of medial support
and varied the bone density to account for variability in bone properties
among hip fracture patients.Objectives
Methods
