Advances in treatment have extended the life expectancy of patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD). Patients could experience more skeletal-related events (SREs) as a result of this progress. Those who have already experienced a SRE could encounter another local management for a subsequent SRE, which is not part of the treatment for the initial SRE. However, there is a noted gap in research on the rate and characteristics of subsequent SREs requiring further localized treatment, obligating clinicians to extrapolate from experiences with initial SREs when confronting subsequent ones. This study aimed to investigate the proportion of MBD patients developing subsequent SREs requiring local treatment, examine if there are prognostic differences at the initial treatment between those with single versus subsequent SREs, and determine if clinical, oncological, and prognostic features differ between initial and subsequent SRE treatments. This retrospective study included 3,814 adult patients who received local treatment – surgery and/or radiotherapy – for bone metastasis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2019. All included patients had at least one SRE requiring local treatment. A subsequent SRE was defined as a second SRE requiring local treatment. Clinical, oncological, and prognostic features were compared between single SREs and subsequent SREs using Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher’s exact test, and Kaplan–Meier curve.Aims
Methods
Socioeconomic and racial disparities have been recognized as impacting the care of patients with cancer, however there are a lack of data examining the impact of these disparities on patients with bone sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to examine socioeconomic and racial disparities that impact the oncological outcomes of patients with bone sarcoma. We reviewed 4,739 patients diagnosed with primary bone sarcomas from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 2007 and 2015. We examined the impact of race and insurance status associated with the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis, treatment outcome, and overall survival (OS).Aims
Methods
Pathological fractures in children can occur
as a result of a variety of conditions, ranging from metabolic diseases and
infection to tumours. Fractures through benign and malignant bone
tumours should be recognised and managed appropriately by the treating
orthopaedic surgeon. The most common benign bone tumours that cause pathological
fractures in children are unicameral bone cysts, aneurysmal bone
cysts, non-ossifying fibromas and fibrous dysplasia. Although pathological
fractures through a primary bone malignancy are rare, these should
be recognised quickly in order to achieve better outcomes. A thorough
history, physical examination and review of plain radiographs are
crucial to determine the cause and guide treatment. In most benign
cases the fracture will heal and the lesion can be addressed at
the time of the fracture, or after the fracture is healed. A step-wise
and multidisciplinary approach is necessary in caring for paediatric
patients with malignancies. Pathological fractures do not have to
be treated by amputation; these fractures can heal and limb salvage
can be performed when indicated.
