Please check your email for the verification action. You may continue to use the site and you are now logged in, but you will not be able to return to the site in future until you confirm your email address.
Objective. Mortality rates reported by the NationalJointRegistry for England
and Wales (NJR) were higher following cemented total knee replacement
(TKR) compared with uncemented procedures. The aim of this study
is to examine and compare the effects of cemented and uncemented
TKR on the activation of selected markers of inflammation, endothelium,
and coagulation, and on the activation of selected cytokines involved
in the various aspects of the systemic response following surgery. Methods. This was a single centre, prospective, case-control study. Following
enrolment, blood samples were taken pre-operatively, and further
samples were collected at day one and day seven post-operatively.
One patient in the cemented group developed a deep-vein thrombosis
confirmed on ultrasonography and was excluded, leaving 19 patients
in this cohort (mean age 67.4, (. sd. 10.62)), and one patient
in the uncemented group developed a post-operative wound infection
and was excluded, leaving 19 patients (mean age 66.5, (. sd. 7.82)). Results. Both groups had a similar response with regards to the levels
of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis
factor-alpha (TNFα). CD40 levels rose significantly on the cemented
group over day one to day seven compared with that of the uncemented
group, which occurred over the first 24 hours. The CD14/42a levels demonstrated
a statistically significant increase in the cemented group (p <
0.001 first 24 hours and p = 0.02 between days one and seven). . Conclusions. The uncemented and cemented groups demonstrated significant changes
in the various parameters measured at various time points but apart
from CD14/42a levels, there was no significant difference in the
serum markers of inflammation, coagulation and endothelial dysfunction
following cemented TKR. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:108–16