Socioeconomic and racial disparities have been recognized as impacting the care of patients with cancer, however there are a lack of data examining the impact of these disparities on patients with bone sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to examine socioeconomic and racial disparities that impact the oncological outcomes of patients with bone sarcoma. We reviewed 4,739 patients diagnosed with primary bone sarcomas from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry between 2007 and 2015. We examined the impact of race and insurance status associated with the presence of metastatic disease at diagnosis, treatment outcome, and overall survival (OS).Aims
Methods
To assess the accuracy of patient-specific instruments (PSIs) CT scans were obtained from five female cadaveric pelvises. Five osteotomies were designed using Mimics software: sacroiliac, biplanar supra-acetabular, two parallel iliopubic and ischial. For cases of the left hemipelvis, PSIs were designed to guide standard oscillating saw osteotomies and later manufactured using 3D printing. Osteotomies were performed using the standard manual technique in cases of the right hemipelvis. Post-resection CT scans were quantitatively analysed. Student’s Objectives
Methods
In this cross sectional study, the impact and the efficacy of a surveillance programme for sarcomas of the extremities was analysed. All patients who had treatment with curative intent for a high-grade sarcoma and were diagnosed before 2014 were included and followed for a minimum of two years.Objectives
Methods
Clinical studies of patients with bone sarcomas have been challenged
by insufficient numbers at individual centres to draw valid conclusions.
Our objective was to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive
multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to determine whether
a five-day regimen of post-operative antibiotics, in comparison
to a
24-hour regimen, decreases surgical site infections in patients
undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity primary
bone tumours. We performed a pilot international multi-centre RCT. We used
central randomisation to conceal treatment allocation and sham antibiotics
to blind participants, surgeons, and data collectors. We determined
feasibility by measuring patient enrolment, completeness of follow-up,
and protocol deviations for the antibiotic regimens. Objective
Methods
Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic bone
disease (MBD) have been available to the orthopaedic community for
more than a decade, with little improvement in service provision
to this increasingly large patient group. Improvements in adjuvant
and neo-adjuvant treatments have increased both the number and overall
survival of patients living with MBD. As a consequence the incidence
of complications of MBD presenting to surgeons has increased and
is set to increase further. The British Orthopaedic Oncology Society
(BOOS) are to publish more revised detailed guidelines on what represents
‘best practice’ in managing patients with MBD. This article is designed
to coincide with and publicise new BOOS guidelines and once again
champion the cause of patients with MBD. A series of short cases highlight common errors frequently being
made in managing patients with MBD despite the availability of guidelines.Objectives
Methods
