Previous studies have suggested that metal-on-metal (MoM) Pinnacle (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, Indiana) hip arthroplasties implanted after 2006 exhibit higher failure rates. This was attributed to the production of implants with reduced diametrical clearances between their bearing surfaces, which, it was speculated, were outside manufacturing tolerances. This study aimed to better understand the performance of Pinnacle Systems manufactured before and after this event. A total of 92 retrieved MoM Pinnacle hips were analyzed, of which 45 were implanted before 2007, and 47 from 2007 onwards. The ‘pre-2007’ group contained 45 implants retrieved from 21 male and 24 female patients, with a median age of 61.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57.1 to 65.5); the ‘2007 onwards’ group contained 47 implants retrieved from 19 male and 28 female patients, with a median age of 61.8 years (IQR 58.5 to 67.8). The volume of material lost from their bearing and taper surfaces was measured using coordinate and roundness measuring machines. These outcomes were then compared statistically using linear regression models, adjusting for potentially confounding factors.Objectives
Methods
Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing (MOMHR) is available as an alternative
option for younger, more active patients. There are failure modes
that are unique to MOMHR, which include loosening of the femoral
head and fractures of the femoral neck. Previous studies have speculated
that changes in the vascularity of the femoral head may contribute
to these failure modes. This study compares the survivorship between
the standard posterior approach (SPA) and modified posterior approach
(MPA) in MOMHR. A retrospective clinical outcomes study was performed examining
351 hips (279 male, 72 female) replaced with Birmingham Hip Resurfacing
(BHR, Smith and Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) in 313 patients with
a pre-operative diagnosis of osteoarthritis. The mean follow-up
period for the SPA group was 2.8 years (0.1 to 6.1) and for the
MPA, 2.2 years (0.03 to 5.2); this difference in follow-up period
was statistically significant (p <
0.01). Survival analysis was
completed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Objectives
Methods
