Aims. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between reason for
Aims. Modular dual mobility (MDM) acetabular components are often used with the aim of reducing the risk of dislocation in
Aims. Studying the indications for
Aims. The aim of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors associated with mortality in patients requiring
This study compares the re-revision rate and mortality following septic and aseptic revision hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in registry data, and compares the outcomes to previously reported data. This is an observational cohort study using data from the German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD). A total of 17,842 rTHAs were included, and the rates and cumulative incidence of hip re-revision and mortality following septic and aseptic rTHA were analyzed with seven-year follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine the re-revision rate and cumulative probability of mortality following rTHA.Aims
Methods
Aims.
We prospectively evaluated the long-term outcome of 158 consecutive patients who underwent
Aims. The use of trabecular metal (TM) shells supported by augments has provided good mid-term results after
We hypothesised that the use of tantalum (Ta)
acetabular components in
Tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stems have
a long history in Europe and are increasing in popularity in North America.
We have reviewed the results at our institution looking at stem
survival and clinical outcomes. Radiological outcomes and quality
of life assessments have been performed and compared to cylindrical
non-modular cobalt chromium stems. Survival at five years was 94%.
This fell to 85% at ten years due to stem breakage with older designs.
Review of radiology showed maintenance or improvement of bone stock
in 87% of cases. Outcome scores were superior in tapered stems despite
worse pre-operative femoral deficiency. Tapered stems have proved
to be a useful alternative in
The ‘jumbo’ acetabular component is now commonly
used in acetabular revision surgery where there is extensive bone
loss. It offers high surface contact, permits weight bearing over
a large area of the pelvis, the need for bone grafting is reduced
and it is usually possible to restore centre of rotation of the
hip. Disadvantages of its use include a technique in which bone
structure may not be restored, a risk of excessive posterior bone
loss during reaming, an obligation to employ screw fixation, limited
bone ingrowth with late failure and high hip centre, leading to increased
risk of dislocation. Contraindications include unaddressed pelvic
dissociation, inability to implant the component with a rim fit,
and an inability to achieve screw fixation. Use in acetabulae with
<
50% bone stock has also been questioned. Published results
have been encouraging in the first decade, with late failures predominantly because
of polyethylene wear and aseptic loosening. Dislocation is the most
common complication of jumbo acetabular revisions, with an incidence
of approximately 10%, and often mandates revision. Based on published results,
a hemispherical component with an enhanced porous coating, highly
cross-linked polyethylene, and a large femoral head appears to represent
the optimum tribology for jumbo acetabular revisions. Cite this article:
We retrospectively reviewed 40 hips in 36 patients who had undergone acetabular reconstruction using a titanium Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allografts between May 2001 and April 2006. Impacted bone allografts were used for the management of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Type II defects in 17 hips, and bulk bone allografts together with impacted allografts were used for the management of Type III defects in 23 hips. A total of five hips showed radiological failure at a mean follow-up of 6.7 years (4.5 to 9.3), two of which were infected. The mean pre-operative Merle d’Aubigné score was 10 (5 to 15) vs 13.6 (9 to 18) at the latest follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate at ten years, calculated using radiological failure or revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the endpoint, was 87% (95% confidence interval 76.3 to 97.7). A separate experimental analysis of the mechanical properties of the device and the load-displacement properties of bone grafts showed that a structurally hard allograft resected from femoral heads of patients with osteoarthritis should be preferentially used in any type of defect. If impacted bone allografts were used, a bone graft thickness of <
25 mm was acceptable in Type II defects. This clinical study indicates that
In this retrospective study, we investigated
the results of
Patients who had a
Aims. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity
and predictive values of previously reported thresholds of proximal
translation and sagittal rotation of cementless acetabular components
used for
The technique of femoral cement-in-cement revision
is well established, but there are no previous series reporting its
use on the acetabular side at the time of
Aims. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the minimum
five-year outcome of
We used a trochanteric slide osteotomy (TSO) in 94 consecutive
The long-term results of grafting with hydroxyapatite granules for acetabular deficiency in