Aims.
The purpose of this study was to report the outcome
of ‘isolated’
The purpose of this study is to determine an individual’s age-specific prevalence of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after cruciate ligament surgery, and to identify clinical and genetic risk factors associated with undergoing TKA. This study was a retrospective case-control study using the UK Biobank to identify individuals reporting a history of cruciate ligament surgery. Data from verbal history and procedural codes recorded through the NHS were used to identify instances of TKA. Patient clinical and genetic data were used to identify risk factors for progression from cruciate ligament surgery to TKA. Individuals without a history of cruciate ligament reconstruction were used for comparison.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to estimate the incremental use of resources, costs, and quality of life outcomes associated with surgical reconstruction compared to rehabilitation for long-standing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in the NHS, and to estimate its cost-effectiveness. A total of 316 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to either surgical reconstruction or rehabilitation (physiotherapy but with subsequent reconstruction permitted if instability persisted after treatment). Healthcare resource use and health-related quality of life data (EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire) were collected in the trial at six, 12, and 18 months using self-reported questionnaires and medical records. Using intention-to-treat analysis, differences in costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) between treatment arms were estimated adjusting for baseline differences and following multiple imputation of missing data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated as the difference in costs divided by the difference in QALYs between reconstruction and rehabilitation.Aims
Methods
Between 1993 and 1994, 891 patients underwent
primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A total
of 48 patients had undergone bilateral ACL reconstruction and
42 were available for review. These patients were matched to a unilateral
ACL reconstruction control group for gender, age, sport of primary
injury, meniscal status and graft type. At 15-year follow-up a telephone
interview with patients in both groups was performed. The incidence
of further ACL injury was identified through structured questions
and the two groups were compared for the variables of graft rupture
or further ACL injury, family history of ACL injury, International
Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and activity
level. There were 28 male and 14 female patients with a mean age of
25 years (13 to 42) at the time of first ACL injury. Subsequent
further ACL injury was identified in ten patients (24%) in the bilateral
ACL reconstruction study group and in nine patients (21%) in the
unilateral ACL reconstruction control group (p = 0.794). The mean
time from bilateral ACL reconstruction to further ACL injury was
54 months (6 to 103). There was no significant difference between
the bilateral ACL reconstruction study group and the matched unilateral
ACL reconstruction control group in incidence of further ACL injury
(p = 0.794), family history of ACL injury (p = 0.595), IKDC activity
level (p = 0.514), or IKDC subjective score (p = 0.824). After bilateral ACL reconstruction the incidence of graft rupture
and subjective outcomes were equivalent to that after unilateral
ACL reconstructions. Cite this article: