The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) versus hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented HA for the treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. A within-trial economic evaluation was conducted based on data collected from the World Hip Trauma Evaluation 5 (WHiTE 5) multicentre randomized controlled trial in the UK. Resource use was measured over 12 months post-randomization using trial case report forms and participant-completed questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness was reported in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from the NHS and personal social service perspective. Methodological uncertainty was addressed using sensitivity analysis, while decision uncertainty was represented graphically using confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.Aims
Methods
This study estimated trends in incidence of open fractures and the adherence to clinical standards for open fracture care in England. Longitudinal data collected by the Trauma Audit and Research Network were used to identify 38,347 patients with open fractures, and a subgroup of 12,170 with severe open fractures of the tibia, between 2008 and 2019 in England. Incidence rates per 100,000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Clinical care was compared with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and National Major Trauma Centre audit standards.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether national standards of best practice are associated with improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in hip fracture patients. This was a multicentre cohort study conducted in 20 acute UK NHS hospitals treating hip fracture patients. Patients aged ≥ 60 years treated operatively for a hip fracture were eligible for inclusion. Regression models were fitted to each of the “Best Practice Tariff” indicators and overall attainment. The impact of attainment on HRQoL was assessed by quantifying improvement in EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) from estimated regression model coefficients.Aims
Methods
Surgical treatment of hip fracture is challenging; the bone is porotic and fixation failure can be catastrophic. Novel implants are available which may yield superior clinical outcomes. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of the novel X-Bolt Hip System (XHS) with the sliding hip screw (SHS) for the treatment of fragility hip fractures. We conducted a multicentre, superiority, randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 60 years and older with a trochanteric hip fracture were recruited in ten acute UK NHS hospitals. Participants were randomly allocated to fixation of their fracture with XHS or SHS. A total of 1,128 participants were randomized with 564 participants allocated to each group. Participants and outcome assessors were blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the EuroQol five-dimension five-level health status (EQ-5D-5L) utility at four months. The minimum clinically important difference in utility was pre-specified at 0.075. Secondary outcomes were EQ-5D-5L utility at 12 months, mortality, residential status, mobility, revision surgery, and radiological measures.Aims
Methods
Acetabular fractures in older adults lead to a high risk of mortality and morbidity. However, only limited data have been published documenting functional outcomes in such patients. The aims of this study were to describe outcomes in patients aged 60 years and older with operatively managed acetabular fractures, and to establish predictors of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). We conducted a retrospective, registry-based study of 80 patients aged 60 years and older with acetabular fractures treated surgically at The Alfred and Royal Melbourne Hospital. We reviewed charts and radiological investigations and performed patient interviews/examinations and functional outcome scoring. Data were provided by the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR). Survival analysis was used to describe conversion to THA in the group of patients who initially underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with conversion to THA.Aims
Methods
Bone health assessment and the prescription of medication for secondary fracture prevention have become an integral part of the acute management of patients with hip fracture. However, there is little evidence regarding compliance with prescription guidelines and subsequent adherence to medication in this patient group. The World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE) is a multicentre, prospective cohort of hip fracture patients in NHS hospitals in England and Wales. Patients aged 60 years and older who received operative treatment for a hip fracture were eligible for inclusion in WHiTE. The prescription of bone protection medications was recorded from participants’ discharge summaries, and participant-reported use of bone protection medications was recorded at 120 days following surgery.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study explores data quality in operation type and fracture classification recorded as part of a large research study and a national audit with an independent review. At 17 centres, an expert surgeon reviewed a randomly selected subset of cases from their centre with regard to fracture classification using the AO system and type of operation performed. Agreement for these variables was then compared with the data collected during conduct of the World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE) cohort study. Both types of surgery and fracture classification were collapsed to identify the level of detail of reporting that achieved meaningful agreement. In the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), the types of operation and fracture classification were explored to identify the proportion of “highly improbable” combinations.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study sought to determine the proportion of older adults with hip fractures captured by a multicentre prospective cohort, the World Hip Trauma Evaluation (WHiTE), whether there was evidence of selection bias during WHiTE recruitment, and the extent to which the WHiTE cohort is representative of the broader population of older adults with hip fractures. The characteristics of patients recruited into the WHiTE cohort study were compared with those treated at WHiTE hospitals during the same timeframe and submitted to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD).Aims
Patients and Methods
This study aimed to compare the change in health-related quality
of life of patients receiving a traditional cemented monoblock Thompson
hemiarthroplasty compared with a modern cemented modular polished-taper
stemmed hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. This was a pragmatic, multicentre, multisurgeon, two-arm, parallel
group, randomized standard-of-care controlled trial. It was embedded
within the WHiTE Comprehensive Cohort Study. The sample size was
964 patients. The setting was five National Health Service Trauma
Hospitals in England. A total of 964 patients over 60 years of age who
required hemiarthroplasty of the hip between February 2015 and March
2016 were included. A standardized measure of health outcome, the
EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, was carried out on admission and
at four months following the operation.Aims
Patients and Methods
The optimal treatment for independent patients with a displaced
intracapsular fracture of the hip remains controversial. The recognised
alternatives are hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. At
present there is no established standard of care, with both types
of arthroplasty being used in many centres. We conducted a feasibility study comparing the clinical effectiveness
of a dual mobility acetabular component compared with standard polyethylene
component in total hip arthroplasty for independent patients with
a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip, for a 12-month period
beginning in June 2013. The primary outcome was the risk of dislocation
one year post-operatively. Secondary outcome measures were EuroQol
5 Dimensions, ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people, Oxford
hip score, mortality and re-operation.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures of the distal femur are an important cause of morbidity.
Their optimal management remains controversial. Contemporary implants
include angular-stable anatomical locking plates and locked intramedullary
nails (IMNs). We compared the long-term patient-reported functional
outcome of fixation of fractures of the distal femur using these
two methods of treatment. A total of 297 patients were retrospectively identified from
a State-wide trauma registry in Australia: 195 had been treated
with a locking plate and 102 with an IMN. Baseline characteristics
of the patients and their fractures were recorded. Health-related
quality-of-life, functional and radiographic outcomes were compared
using mixed effects regression models at six months and one year.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to inform a definitive trial which
could determine the clinical effectiveness of the X-Bolt Dynamic
Hip Plating System compared with the sliding hip screw for patients
with complex pertrochanteric fragility fractures of the femur. This was a single centre, participant blinded, randomised, standard-of-care
controlled pilot trial. Patients aged 60 years and over with AO/ASIF
A2 and A3 type femoral pertrochanteric fractures were eligible.Aims
Patients and Methods
Hip fracture is a common injury associated with
high mortality, long-term disability and huge socio-economic burden.
Yet there has been relatively little research into best treatment,
and evidence that has been generated has often been criticised for
its poor quality. Here, we discuss the advances made towards overcoming
these criticisms and the future directions for hip fracture research:
how co-ordinating existing national infrastructures and use of now
established clinical research networks will likely go some way towards
overcoming the practical and financial challenges of conducting
large trials. We highlight the importance of large collaborative
pragmatic trials to inform decision/policy makers and the progress
made towards reaching a consensus on a core outcome set to facilitate data
pooling for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis. These advances and future directions are a priority in order
to establish the high-quality evidence base required for this important
group of patients. Cite this article:
Hip fracture is a global public health problem.
The National Hip Fracture Database provides a framework for service evaluation
in this group of patients in the United Kingdom, but does not collect
patient-reported outcome data and is unable to provide meaningful
data about the recovery of quality of life. We report one-year patient-reported outcomes of a prospective
cohort of patients treated at a single major trauma centre in the
United Kingdom who sustained a hip fracture between January 2012
and March 2014. There was an initial marked decline in quality of life from baseline
measured using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions score (EQ-5D). It was followed
by a significant improvement to 120 days for all patients. Although
their quality of life improved during the year after the fracture,
it was still significantly lower than before injury irrespective
of age group or cognitive impairment (mean reduction EQ-5D 0.22;
95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.26). There was strong evidence
that quality of life was lower for patients with cognitive impairment.
There was a mean reduction in EQ-5D of 0.28 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.35)
in patients <
80 years of age. This difference was consistent
(and fixed) throughout follow-up. Quality of life does not improve
significantly during recovery from hip fracture in patients over
80 years of age (p = 0.928). Secondary measures of function showed
similar trends. Hip fracture marks a step down in the quality of life of a patient:
it accounts for approximately 0.22 disability adjusted life years
in the first year after fracture. This is equivalent to serious
neurological conditions for which extensive funding for research
and treatment is made available. Cite this article:
The lack of a consensus for core health outcomes
that should be reported in clinical research has hampered study design
and evidence synthesis. We report a United Kingdom consensus for
a core outcome set (COS) for clinical trials of patients with a
hip fracture. We adopted a modified nominal group technique to derive consensus
on 1) which outcome domains should be measured, and 2) methods of
assessment. Participants reflected a diversity of perspectives and
experience. They received an evidence synthesis and postal questionnaire
in advance of the consensus meeting, and ranked the importance of
candidate domains and the relevance and suitability of short-listed
measures. During the meeting, pre-meeting source data and questionnaire
responses were summarised, followed by facilitated discussion and
a final plenary session. A COS was determined using a closed voting
system: a 70% consensus was required. Consensus supported a five-domain COS: mortality, pain, activities
of daily living, mobility, and health-related quality of life (HRQL).
Single-item measures of mortality and mobility (indoor/outdoor walking
status) and a generic multi-item measure of HRQL - the EuroQoL EQ-5D
- were recommended. These measures should be included as a minimum
in all hip fracture trials. Other outcome measures should be added
depending on the particular interventions being studied. Cite this article:
Cite this article:
We compared a new fixation system, the Targon
Femoral Neck (TFN) hip screw, with the current standard treatment of
cannulated screw fixation. This was a single-centre, participant-blinded,
randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 65 years and over with
either a displaced or undisplaced intracapsular fracture of the
hip were eligible. The primary outcome was the risk of revision
surgery within one year of fixation. A total of 174 participants were included in the trial. The absolute
reduction in risk of revision was of 4.7% (95% CI 14.2 to 22.5)
in favour of the TFN hip screw (chi-squared test, p = 0.741), which
was less than the pre-specified level of minimum clinically important
difference. There were no significant differences in any of the
secondary outcome measures. We found no evidence of a clinical difference in the risk of
revision surgery between the TFN hip screw and cannulated screw
fixation for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip. Cite this article:
The importance for observing the intention-to-treat
approach in clinical studies is explained. Cite this article:
Concerns have been reported to the United Kingdom
National Patient Safety Agency, warning that cementing the femoral component
during hip replacement surgery for fracture of the proximal femur
may increase peri-operative mortality. The National Hip Fracture Database collects demographic and outcome
data about patients with a fracture of the proximal femur from over
100 participating hospitals in the United Kingdom. We conducted
a mixed effects logistic regression analysis of this dataset to
determine whether peri-operative mortality was increased in patients
who had undergone either hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement
using a cemented femoral component. A total of 16 496 patients from
129 hospitals were included in the analysis, which showed a small
but significant adjusted survival benefit associated with cementing
(odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.96). Other statistically
significant variables in predicting death at discharge, listed in
order of magnitude of effect, were gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists
grade, age, walking accompanied outdoors and arthroplasty. Interaction
terms between cementing and these other variables were sequentially
added to, but did not improve, the model. This study has not shown an increase in peri-operative mortality
as a result of cementing the femoral component in patients requiring
hip replacement following fracture of the proximal femur.
