This study aims to assess the relationship between history of pseudotumour formation secondary to metal-on-metal (MoM) implants and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate, as well as establish ESR and CRP thresholds that are suggestive of infection in these patients. We hypothesized that patients with a pseudotumour were at increased risk of infection. A total of 1,171 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with MoM articulations from August 2000 to March 2014 were retrospectively identified. Of those, 328 patients underwent metal artefact reduction sequence MRI and had minimum two years’ clinical follow-up, and met our inclusion criteria. Data collected included demographic details, surgical indication, laterality, implants used, history of pseudotumour, and their corresponding preoperative ESR (mm/hr) and CRP (mg/dl) levels. Multivariate logistic regression modelling was used to evaluate PJI and history of pseudotumour, and receiver operating characteristic curves were created to assess the diagnostic capabilities of ESR and CRP to determine the presence of infection in patients undergoing revision surgery.Aims
Methods
Several short- and mid-term studies have shown minimal liner wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but the safety of using thinner HXLPE liners to maximize femoral head size remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical survival and radiological wear rates of patients with HXLPE liners, a 36 mm femoral head, and a small acetabular component with a minimum of ten years’ follow-up. We retrospectively identified 55 patients who underwent primary THA performed at a single centre, using HXLPE liners with 36 mm cobalt-chrome heads in acetabular components with an outer diameter of 52 mm or smaller. Patient demographic details, implant details, death, and all-cause revisions were recorded. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival was used to determine all-cause and liner-specific revision. Of these 55 patients, 22 had a minimum radiological follow-up of seven years and were assessed radiologically for linear and volumetric wear.Aims
Methods
Aims. Proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacements (PFEPRs) are the most common reconstruction option for osseous defects following primary and metastatic tumour resection. This study aimed to compare the rate of implant failure between PFEPRs with monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties and acetabular arthroplasties, and determine the optimum articulation for revision PFEPRs. Methods. This is a retrospective review of 233 patients who underwent PFEPR. The mean age was 54.7 years (SD 18.2), and 99 (42.5%) were male. There were 90 patients with primary bone tumours (38.6%), 122 with metastatic bone disease (52.4%), and 21 with haematological malignancy (9.0%). A total of 128 patients had monopolar (54.9%), 74 had bipolar hemiarthroplasty heads (31.8%), and 31 underwent acetabular arthroplasty (13.3%). Results. At a mean 74.4 months follow-up, the overall revision rate was 15.0%. Primary malignancy (p < 0.001) and age < 50 years (p < 0.001) were risk factors for revision. The risks of death and implant failure were similar in patients with primary disease (p = 0.872), but the risk of death was significantly greater for patients who had metastatic bone disease (p < 0.001). Acetabular-related implant failures comprised 74.3% of revisions; however, no difference between hemiarthroplasty or arthroplasty groups (p = 0.209), or between monopolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasties (p = 0.307), was observed. There was greater radiological wear in patients with longer follow-up and primary bone malignancy. Re-revision rates following a revision PFEPR was 34.3%, with dual-mobility bearings having the lowest rate of instability and re-revision (15.4%). Conclusion. Hemiarthroplasty and arthroplasty PFEPRs carry the same risk of revision in the medium term, and is primarily due to acetabular complications. There is no difference in revision rates or erosion between monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties. The main causes of failure were acetabular wear in the hemiarthroplasty group and instability in the arthroplasty group. These risks should be balanced and patient prognosis considered when contemplating the bearing choice. Dual-mobility, constrained bearings, or
Aims. The purpose of this study is to examine six types of bearing surfaces implanted at a single institution over three decades to determine whether the reasons for revision vary among the groups and how long it takes to identify differences in survival. Methods. We considered six cohorts that included a total of 1,707 primary hips done between 1982 and 2010. These included 223 conventional polyethylene sterilized with γ irradiation in air (CPE-GA), 114 conventional polyethylene sterilized with gas plasma (CPE-GP), 116 crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE), 1,083 metal-on-metal (MOM), 90 ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), and 81 surface arthroplasties (SAs). With the exception of the COC, all other groups used cobalt-chromium (CoCr) femoral heads. The mean follow-up was 10 (0.008 to 35) years. Descriptive statistics with revisions per 100 component years (re/100 yr) and survival analysis with revision for any reason as the endpoint were used to compare bearing surfaces. Results. XLPE liners demonstrated a lower cumulative incidence of revision at 15 years compared to the CPE-GA and CPE-GP groups owing to the absence of wear-related revisions (4% for XLPE vs 18%, p = 0.02, and 15%, p = 0.003, respectively). Revisions for adverse local tissue reactions occurred exclusively among the MOM (0.8 re/100 year) and SA groups (0.1 re/100 year). The revision rate for instability was lower among hips with 36 mm and larger head sizes compared to smaller head sizes (0.2% vs 2%, p < 0.001). Conclusion. The introduction of XLPE has eliminated wear-related revisions through 15-year follow-up compared to CPE-GP and CPE-GA. Dislocation incidence has been reduced with the introduction of
The present study investigated the five-year interval changes in pseudotumours and measured serum metal ions at long-term follow-up of a previous report of 28 mm diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 72 patients (mean age 46.6 years (37 to 55); 43 men, 29 women; 91 hips) who underwent cementless primary MoM THA with a 28 mm modular head were included. The mean follow-up duration was 20.3 years (18 to 24). All patients had CT scans at a mean 15.1 years (13 to 19) after the index operation and subsequent follow-up at a mean of 20.2 years (18 to 24). Pseudotumour volume, type of mass, and new-onset pseudotumours were evaluated using CT scanning. Clinical outcomes were assessed by Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the presence of groin pain. Serum metal ion (cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr)) levels were measured at the latest follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. This study reports the mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a monoblock acetabular component with a large-diameter head (LDH) ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing. Patients and Methods. Of the 276 hips (246 patients) included in this study, 264 (96%) were reviewed at a mean of 67 months (48 to 79) postoperatively. Procedures were performed with a mini posterior approach. Clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded at regular intervals. A noise assessment questionnaire was completed at last follow-up. Results. There were four re-operations (1%) including one early revision for insufficient primary fixation (0.4%). No hip dislocation was reported. The mean University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) score, SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were 6.6 (2 to 10), 52.8 (25.5 to 65.7), 53.0 (27.2 to 66.5), 7.7 (0 to 63), and 88.5 (23 to 100), respectively. No signs of loosening or osteolysis were observed on radiological review. The incidence of squeaking was 23% (n = 51/225). Squeaking was significantly associated with
There are limited published data detailing the volumetric material loss from tapers of conventional metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Our aim was to address this by comparing the taper wear rates measured in an explanted cohort of the widely used Exeter THA with those measured in a group of metal-on-metal (MoM) THAs. We examined an existing retrieval database to identify all Exeter V40 and Universal MoP THAs. Volumetric wear analysis of the taper surfaces was conducted using previously validated methodology. These values were compared with those obtained from a series of MoM THAs using non-parametric statistical methodology. A number of patient and device variables were accounted for using multiple regression modelling.Aims
Patients and Methods
Dislocation rates are reportedly lower in patients requiring
proximal femoral hemiarthroplasty than for patients undergoing hip
arthroplasty for neoplasia. Without acetabular replacement, pain
due to acetabular wear necessitating revision surgery has been described.
We aimed to determine whether wear of the native acetabulum following
hemiarthroplasty necessitates revision surgery with secondary replacement
of the acetabulum after proximal femoral replacement (PFR) for tumour
reconstruction. We reviewed 100 consecutive PFRs performed between January 2003
and January 2013 without acetabular resurfacing. The procedure was
undertaken in 74 patients with metastases, for a primary bone tumour
in 20 and for myeloma in six. There were 48 male and 52 female patients,
with a mean age of 61.4 years (19 to 85) and median follow-up of
two years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5 to 3.7 years). In total,
52 patients presented with a pathological fracture and six presented
with failed fixation of a previously instrumented pathological fracture.Aims
Patients and Methods
There is increasing global awareness of adverse
reactions to metal debris and elevated serum metal ion concentrations
following the use of second generation metal-on-metal total hip
arthroplasties. The high incidence of these complications can be
largely attributed to corrosion at the head-neck interface. Severe
corrosion of the taper is identified most commonly in association
with larger diameter femoral heads. However, there is emerging evidence
of varying levels of corrosion observed in retrieved components
with smaller diameter femoral heads. This same mechanism of galvanic
and mechanically-assisted crevice corrosion has been observed in
metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic components, suggesting an inherent
biomechanical problem with current designs of the head-neck interface. We provide a review of the fundamental questions and answers
clinicians and researchers must understand regarding corrosion of
the taper, and its relevance to current orthopaedic practice. Cite this article:
When fracture of an extensively porous-coated
femoral component occurs, its removal at revision total hip arthroplasty
(THA) may require a femoral osteotomy and the use of a trephine.
The remaining cortical bone after using the trephine may develop
thermally induced necrosis. A retrospective review identified 11
fractured, well-fixed, uncemented, extensively porous-coated femoral
components requiring removal using a trephine with a minimum of
two years of follow-up. The mean time to failure was 4.6 years (1.7 to 9.1, standard
deviation ( A total of four patients (36.4%) required further revision: three
for instability and one for fracture of the revision component.
There was no statistically significant difference in the mean Harris
hip score before implant fracture (82.4; These findings suggest that removal of a fractured, well-fixed,
uncemented, extensively porous-coated femoral component using a
trephine does not compromise subsequent fixation at revision THA
and the patient’s pre-operative level of function can be restored.
However, the loss of proximal bone stock before revision may be associated
with a high rate of dislocation post-operatively. Cite this article:
We investigated the incidence of soft-tissue
lesions after small head metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM THR).
Between December 1993 and May 1999, 149 patients (195 hips) underwent
primary cementless MoM THR. During the follow-up period, three patients (five THRs) died
and eight patients (14 THRs) were lost to follow-up. We requested
that all patients undergo CT evaluation. After exclusion of five
patients (six THRs) who had undergone a revision procedure, and
22 (28 THRs) who were unwilling to take part in this study, 111
patients (142 THRs) were evaluated. There were 63 men (88 THRs)
and 48 women (54 THRs) with a mean age of 45.7 years (37 to 56)
at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 15.4 years (13 to
19). A soft-tissue lesion was defined as an abnormal peri-prosthetic
collection of fluid, solid lesion or asymmetrical soft-tissue mass. At final follow-up, soft-tissue lesions were found in relation
to 28 THRs (19.7%), including 25 solid and three cystic lesions.
They were found in 20 men and eight women; 26 lesions were asymptomatic
and two were symptomatic. The mean maximal diameter of the soft-tissue
lesion was 42.3 mm (17 to 135). The relatively high rate of soft-tissue lesions
observed with small head MoM THR remains a concern. Cite this article:
We conducted a retrospective study to assess
the prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) in patients
operated on at our institution with metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip
replacements with 36 mm heads using a Pinnacle acetabular shell.
A total of 326 patients (150 males, 175 hips; 176 females, 203 hips)
with a mean age of 62.7 years (28 to 85) and mean follow-up of 7.5
years (0.1 to 10.8) participating in our in-depth modern MoM follow-up
programme were included in the study, which involved recording whole
blood cobalt and chromium ion measurements, Oxford hip scores (OHS)
and plain radiographs of the hip and targeted cross-sectional imaging. Elevated
blood metal ion levels (>
5 parts per billion) were seen in 32 (16.1%)
of the 199 patients who underwent unilateral replacement. At 23
months after the start of our modern MoM follow-up programme, 29
new cases of ARMD had been revealed. Hence, the nine-year survival
of this cohort declined from 96% (95% CI 95 to 98) with the old
surveillance routine to 86% (95% CI 82 to 90) following the new
protocol. Although ARMD may not be as common in 36 mm MoM THRs as
in those with larger heads, these results support the Medicines
and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency guidelines on regular
reviews and further investigations, and emphasise the need for specific
a follow-up programme for patients with MoM THRs. Cite this article:
Dislocation remains among the most common complications
of, and reasons for, revision of both primary and revision total
hip replacements (THR). Hence, there is great interest in maximising
stability to prevent this complication. Head size has been recognised
to have a strong influence on the risk of dislocation post-operatively.
As femoral head size increases, stability is augmented, secondary
to an increase in impingement-free range of movement. Larger head
sizes also greatly increase the ‘jump distance’ required for the
head to dislocate in an appropriately positioned cup. Level-one
studies support the use of
Surgical interventions consisting of internal
fixation (IF) or total hip replacement (THR) are required to restore
patient mobility after hip fractures. Conventionally, this decision
was based solely upon the degree of fracture displacement. However,
in the last ten years, there has been a move to incorporate patient
characteristics into the decision making process. Research demonstrating
that joint replacement renders superior functional results when compared
with IF, in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures, has
swayed the pendulum in favour of THR. However, a high risk of dislocation
has always been the concern. Fortunately, there are newer technologies
and alternative surgical approaches that can help reduce the risk
of dislocation. The authors propose an algorithm for the treatment
of femoral neck fractures: if minimally displaced, in the absence
of hip joint arthritis, IF should be performed; if arthritis is
present, or the fracture is displaced, then THR is preferred. Cite this article:
Dislocation is one of the most common causes
of patient and surgeon dissatisfaction following hip replacement
and to treat it, the causes must first be understood. Patient factors
include age greater than 70 years, medical comorbidities, female
gender, ligamentous laxity, revision surgery, issues with the abductors,
and patient education. Surgeon factors include the annual quantity
of procedures and experience, the surgical approach, adequate restoration
of femoral offset and leg length, component position, and soft-tissue
or bony impingement. Implant factors include the design of the head
and neck region, and so-called skirts on longer neck lengths. There
should be offset choices available in order to restore soft-tissue
tension. Lipped liners aid in gaining stability, yet if improperly placed
may result in impingement and dislocation. Late dislocation may
result from polyethylene wear, soft-tissue destruction, trochanteric
or abductor disruption and weakness, or infection. Understanding
the causes of hip dislocation facilitates prevention in a majority
of instances. Proper pre-operative planning includes the identification
of patients with a high offset in whom inadequate restoration of
offset will reduce soft-tissue tension and abductor efficiency.
Component position must be accurate to achieve stability without impingement.
Finally, patient education cannot be over-emphasised, as most dislocations occur
early, and are preventable with proper instructions. Cite this article:
A modular femoral head–neck junction has practical
advantages in total hip replacement. Taper fretting and corrosion
have so far been an infrequent cause of revision. The role of design
and manufacturing variables continues to be debated. Over the past
decade several changes in technology and clinical practice might
result in an increase in clinically significant taper fretting and
corrosion. Those factors include an increased usage of large diameter
(36 mm) heads, reduced femoral neck and taper dimensions, greater
variability in taper assembly with smaller incision surgery, and
higher taper stresses due to increased patient weight and/or physical
activity. Additional studies are needed to determine the role of
taper assembly compared with design, manufacturing and other implant
variables. Cite this article:
Large femoral heads have been used with increasing
frequency over the last decade. The prime reason is likely the effect
of large heads on stability. The larger head neck ratio, combined
with the increased jump distance of larger heads result in a greater
arc of impingement free motion, and greater resistance to dislocation
in a provocative position. Multiple studies have demonstrated clear
clinical efficacy in diminishing dislocation rates with the use
of large femoral heads. With crosslinked polyethylene, wear has
been shown to be equivalent between larger and smaller heads. However,
the stability advantages of increasing diameter beyond 38 mm have
not been clearly demonstrated. More importantly, recent data implicates
large heads in the increasing prevalence of groin pain and psoas impingement.
There are clear benefits with larger femoral head diameters, but
the advantages of diameters beyond 38 mm have not yet been demonstrated
clinically.
United Kingdom National Institute for Health
and Clinical Excellence guidelines recommend the use of total hip replacement
(THR) for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck
in cognitively intact patients, who were independently mobile prior
to the injury. This study aimed to analyse the risk factors associated
with revision of the implant and mortality following THR, and to
quantify risk. National Joint Registry data recording a THR performed
for acute fracture of the femoral neck between 2003 and 2010 were
analysed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate
the extent to which risk of revision was related to specific covariates.
Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyse factors affecting
peri-operative mortality (<
90 days). A total of 4323 procedures
were studied. There were 80 patients who had undergone revision
surgery at the time of censoring (five-year revision rate 3.25%, 95%
confidence interval 2.44 to 4.07) and 137 patients (3.2%) patients
died within 90 days. After adjusting for patient and surgeon characteristics,
an increased risk of revision was associated with the use of cementless
prostheses compared with cemented (hazard ratio (HR) 1.33, p = 0.021).
Revision was independent of bearing surface and head size. The risk
of mortality within 90 days was significantly increased with higher
American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (grade 3: odds
ratio (OR) 4.04, p <
0.001; grade 4/5: OR 20.26, p <
0.001;
both compared with grades 1/2) and older age (≥ 75 years: OR 1.65,
p = 0.025), but reduced over the study period (9% relative risk reduction
per year). THR is a good option in patients aged <
75 years and with
ASA 1/2. Cementation of the femoral component does not adversely
affect peri-operative mortality but improves survival of the implant
in the mid-term when compared with cementless femoral components.
There are no benefits of using head sizes >
28 mm or bearings other
than metal-on-polyethylene. More research is required to determine
the benefits of THR over hemiarthroplasty in older patients and
those with ASA grades >
2.
An international faculty of orthopaedic surgeons
presented their work on the current challenges in hip surgery at
the London Hip Meeting which was attended by over
400 delegates. The topics covered included femoroacetabular impingement, thromboembolic
phenomena associated with hip surgery, bearing surfaces (including metal-on-metal
articulations), outcomes of hip replacement surgery and revision
hip replacement. We present a concise report of the current opinions
on hip surgery from this meeting with appropriate references to
the current literature.
We retrospectively analysed concentrations of chromium and cobalt ions in samples of synovial fluid and whole blood taken from a group of 92 patients with failed current-generation metal-on-metal hip replacements. We applied acid oxidative digestion to our trace metal analysis protocol, which found significantly higher levels of metal ion concentrations in blood and synovial fluid than a non-digestive method. Patients were subcategorised by mode of failure as either ‘unexplained pain’ or ‘defined causes’. Using this classification, chromium and cobalt ion levels were present over a wider range in synovial fluid and not as strongly correlated with blood ion levels as previously reported. There was no significant difference between metal ion concentrations and manufacturer of the implant, nor femoral head size below or above 50 mm. There was a moderately positive correlation between metal ion levels and acetabular component inclination angle as measured on three-dimensional CT imaging. Our results suggest that acid digestion of samples of synovial fluid samples is necessary to determine metal ion concentrations accurately so that meaningful comparisons can be made between studies.
