The increased demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is having a significant impact on healthcare resources, resulting in increased interest in outpatient care pathways to reduce resource consumption. This study compared costs between patients who underwent outpatient THA using a Direct Anterior (DA) approach compared to a Direct Lateral (DL) approach to understand the effect of surgical approach on resource use.

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial for DA patients undergoing primary THA. We compared patients in the outpatient arm of the trial to a prospective cohort of outpatient DL approach THAs. We recorded all costs including: equipment, length of stay in hospital, and laboratory or other medical tests. Following discharge, participants also completed a self-reported cost diary recording resource utilization such as emergency department visits or subsequent hospitalizations, tests and procedures, consultations or follow-up, healthcare professional services, rehabilitation, use of pain medications, informal care, productivity losses and out of pocket expenditures.

We report costs from both Canadian public health care payer (HCP) and a societal perspective. The HCP perspective includes any direct health costs covered by the publicly funded system. In addition to the health care system costs, the societal perspective also includes additional costs to the patient (e.g. physiotherapy, medication, or assistive devices), as well as any indirect costs such as time off paid employment for patients or caregivers.

We included 127 patients in the DA group (66.6 years old) and 51 patients in the DL group (59.4 years old) (p<0.01).

There were no statistically significant differences in costs between groups from both the healthcare payer (DA= 7910.19, DL= 7847.17, p=0.80) and societal perspectives (DA= 14657.21, DL= 14581.21, p=0.96)

In patients undergoing a successful outpatient hip replacement, surgical approach does not have an effect on cost from in hospital or societal perspectives.

Total knee arthroplasty is a successful procedure that reduces knee pain and improves function in most patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patient dissatisfaction however remains high, and along with implant longevity, may be affected by component positioning. Surgery in obese patients is more technically challenging with difficulty identifying appropriate landmarks for alignment and more difficult exposure of the joint. Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced with the goal to increase accuracy of component positioning by custom fitting cutting guides to the patient using advanced imaging. A strong criticism of this new technology however, is the cost associated. The purpose of this study was to determine, using a prospective, randomized-controlled trial, the cost-effectiveness of PSI compared to standard instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in an obese patient population.

Patients with a body mass index greater than 30 with osteoarthritis and undergoing a primary total knee arthroplasty were included in this study. We randomized patients to have their procedure with either standard instrumentation (SOC) or PSI. At 12-weeks post-surgery patients completed a self-reported cost questionnaire and the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). We performed a cost-effectiveness analyses from a public health payer and societal perspective. As we do not know the true cost of the PSI instrumentation, we estimated a value of $100 for our base case analysis and used one-way sensitivity analyses to determine the effect of different values (ranging from $0 to $500) would have on our conclusions.

A total of 173 patients were enrolled in the study with 86 patients randomized to the PSI group and 87 to the SOC group. We found the PSI group to be both less effective and more costly than SOC when using a public payer perspective, regardless of the cost of the PSI. From a societal perspective, PSI was both less costly, but also less effective, regardless of the cost of the PSI. The mean difference in effect between the two groups was −1.61 (95% CI −3.48, 026, p=0.091). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $485.71 per point increase in the WOMAC, or $7285.58 per clinically meaningful difference (15 points) in the WOMAC.

Overall, our results suggest that PSI is not cost-effective compared to standard of care from a public payer perspective. From a societal perspective, there is some question as to whether the decreased effect found with the PSI group is worth the reduced cost. The main driver of the cost difference appears to be time off of volunteer work, which will need to be investigated further. In future, we will continue to follow these patients out to one year to collect cost and effectiveness data to investigate whether these results remain past 12 weeks post-surgery.

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective surgery for the treatment of advanced osteoarthritis but increasing numbers of these procedures are having a significant impact on healthcare budgets. One route to mitigate the increasing costs is outpatient THA, discharging patients on the same day as their surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of outpatient THA compared to standard overnight stay in hospital.

The purpose of our study was to prospectively examine early functional differences in gait between the direct anterior and direct lateral surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty over the first three months postoperatively.

Forty participants were prospectively enrolled to either the direct anterior (20 patients) or direct lateral group (20 patients) based on their surgeon's expertise. Outcome measures were collected preoperatively at their preadmission appointment and postoperatively at discharge from the hospital, two weeks, six weeks and three months. We used the GAITRite® system to measure gait velocity, stride length, single-limb support and single-limb support symmetry. We also had participants complete the Timed Up and Go test and a series of questionnaires at each visit: WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip Score, and pain VAS.

Our primary outcome, gait velocity, was significantly greater in the direct anterior group at discharge and six weeks postoperatively with adjusted mean differences of 0.12m/s and 0.17m/s respectively. Single-limb support symmetry was also significantly better in the direct anterior group at two weeks, six weeks and three months with adjusted mean differences of 0.10, 0.09 and 0.04 respectively. The direct anterior group also had significantly shorter times to complete the Timed Up and Go test at two and six weeks with adjusted mean differences of −9.02s and −2.64s. There were no differences between the groups at any time point for the WOMAC, SF-12, Harris Hip Score, or pain VAS.

Preliminary results of our expertise-based study have found the direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty offers better early functional outcomes than the direct lateral approach.