Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 93 - 93
10 Feb 2023
Wang A Hughes J Fitzpatrick J Breidhahl W Ebert J Zheng M
Full Access

Interstitial supraspinatus tears can cause persistent subacromial impingement symptoms despite non operative treatment. Autologous tendon cell injection (ATI) is a non-surgical treatment for tendinopathies and tear. We report a randomised controlled study of ATI compared to corticosteroid injection (CS) as treatment for interstitial supraspinatus tears and tendinopathy.

Inclusion criteria were patients with symptom duration > 6 months, MRI confirmed intrasubstance supraspinatus tear, and prior treatment with physiotherapy and ≥ one CS or PRP injection. Participants were randomised to receive ATI to the interstitial tear or corticosteroid injection to the subacromial bursa in a 2:1 ratio, under ultrasound guidance. Assessments of pain (VAS) and function (ASES) were performed at baseline, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post treatment.

30 participants (19 randomised to ATI) with a mean age of 50.5 years (10 females) and a mean duration of symptoms of 23.5 months. Baseline VAS pain and ASES scores were comparable between groups. While mean VAS pain scores improved in both groups at 3 months after treatment, pain scores were superior with ATI at 6 months (p=0.01). Mean ASES scores in the ATI group were superior to the CS group at 3 months (p=0.026) and 6 months (p=0.012). Seven participants in the CS group withdrew prior to 12 months due to lack of improvement. At 12 months, mean VAS pain in the ATI group was 1.6 ± 1.3. The improvements in mean ASES scores in the ATI group at 6 and 12 months were greater than the MCID (12.0 points). At 12 months, 95% of ATI participants had an ASES score > the PASS (patient acceptable symptom state).

This is the first level one study using ATI to treat interstitial supraspinatus tear. ATI results in a significant reduction in pain and improvement in shoulder function.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 24 - 24
1 Dec 2015
Raina D Gupta A Petersen M Hettwer W Nally M Tägil M Zheng M Kumar A Lidgren L
Full Access

To demonstrate the role of an antibiotic containing bone substitute, native bone active proteins and muscle transforming into bone.

Recurrent osteomyelitis was eradicated and filled with a gentamycin eluting bone substitute (Cerament™l G) consisting of sulphate and apatite phases and covered by a muscle flap.

C2C12 muscle cells were seeded on the bone substitute in-vitro and their phenotype was studied.

Another muscle cell line L6 was seeded with osteoblast conditioned medium containing bone active proteins and specific markers were studied for bone differentiation.

A chronic, longstanding, fistulating osteomyelitis was operated with radical eradication and filling of the cavity with gentamycin eluting bone substitute. At one year, the patient had no leg pain and a healed wound. Significant bone was also seen in the overlaying muscle, at one month post-op disappearing after 6-months. Local delivery of gentamycin had a protective effect on bone formation.

C2C12 cells seeded on the gentamycin eluting bone substitute depicted no difference in proliferation when compared to plain bone substitute and expressed 4 folds higher Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) compared to controls.

C2C12 cells expressed proteins and genes coding for collagen type 1 (Col 1), osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN) and bonesialoprotein (BSP).

L6 cells cultured with osteoblast conditioned medium remained uninucleated and expressed osteoblastic proteins like Col 1, OCN, OPN and BSP.

Bone substitute with gentamycin leads to differentiation of mesenchymal cells into bone in-vitro.

Native bone active proteins from an osteoblast culture can induce differentiation of muscle cells in-vitro.

Clinical observations with rapid bone formed in the bone substitute and in some cases in the muscle are a consequence of both leakage of bone active proteins and also from osteoprogenitor cells coming from the overlaying muscle interacting with the osteoinductive bone substitute.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIII | Pages 173 - 173
1 May 2012
Zheng M Willers C
Full Access

Objective

To investigate the histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of revised and failed MACI repair tissues.

Methods

We examined the matrix profiles of repair biopsies taken from revised and clinically failed MACI cases by semi-quantitative immunohistochemical study using antibodies specific to aggrecan, collagens I, II, III, VI, and IX, Sox-9, Ki-67 and MMP-13. We also stiffness tested an intact clinically failed repair site.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIII | Pages 137 - 137
1 May 2012
Zheng M
Full Access

Autologous cell therapy using stem cells and progenitor cells is considered to be a popular approach in regenerative medicine for the repair and regeneration of tissue and organs. In orthopaedic practice, autologous cell therapy has become a major focus, particularly, as a feasible treatment for tendon injury.

Tendons are dense connective tissue that bridge bone to muscle and transmit forces between muscle and bone to maintain mechanical movement. Tendons are poorly vascularised and have very little capacity to self-regenerate. Degeneration of tendon is often caused by injury. The pathogenesis of tendon injury, commonly known as tendinosis, is not an inflammatory condition but is secondary to degenerative changes, including disruption of the collagen matrix, calcification, vascularisation and adipogenesis. The aetiology of tendinosis is considered to be multifactorial and the pathogenesis is still unclear. Intrinsic factors such as a lack of blood and nutrition supply and extrinsic factors such as acute trauma and overuse injury caused by repetitive strain, have been implicated as contributors to the pathogenesis of tendinosis. More recent studies suggest that programmed tendon cell death (tenocyte apoptosis) may play a major role in the development of tendinosis. Such cellular abnormalities may influence the capacity of tendon to maintain its integrity.

Traditional treatments such as anti-inflammatory drugs, steroid injections and physiotherapy are aimed at symptom relief and do not address the underlying pathological changes of degeneration. Here, we propose that autologous cell therapy may be an innovative and promising treatment for tendon injury. We will present evidence that suggest that autologous tendon cell therapy may be feasible to repair and regenerate tendon.

We will also present data summarising the preclinical evaluation of autologous tendon cell therapy in animal models and the safety and tolerability of autologous tendon cell therapy in humans in studies, which are currently conducted at the Centre for Orthopaedic Research at the University of Western Australia.