Disc degeneration is often scored using macroscopic and microscopic scoring systems. Although reproducible, these scores may not accurately reflect declining function in a degenerated disc. Accordingly, we compared macroscopic and microscopic degeneration scores with measurements of disc function. Thirteen cadaveric motion segments (62–93 yrs) were compressed to 1kN while a pressure-transducer was pulled across the mid-sagittal diameter of the disc. Resulting stress profiles indicated intradiscal pressure (IDP), and maximum stress in the anterior (MaxStress_Ant) and posterior (MaxStress_Post) annulus. Macroscopic Introduction
Methods
Decreasing endplate porosity has been proposed as a risk factor for intervertebral disc degeneration, because it interferes with disc metabolite transport. However, endplate porosity has recently been shown to Nineteen cadaver motion segments (61–98 yrs) were compressed to 1kN while a pressure-transducer was pulled across the mid-sagittal diameter of the disc. Stress profiles indicated nucleus (intradiscal) pressure (IDP) and maximum stress in the anterior and posterior annulus. Subsequently, micro-CT was used to evaluate endplate porosity along the antero-posterior diameter of the adjacent endplates. Data were analysed using ANOVA and linear regression.Introduction
Methods
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk in vivo. However, it has limitations in the spine because vertebrae show marked regional variations in BMD that are difficult to detect clinically. This study investigated whether micro-CT can provide improved estimates of BMD that better predict vertebral strength. Ten cadaveric vertebral bodies (mean age: 83.7 +/− 10.8 yrs) were scanned using lateral-projection DEXA and Micro-CT. Standardised protocols were used to determine BMD of the whole vertebral body and of anterior/posterior and superior/inferior regions. Vertebral body volume was assessed by water displacement after which specimens were compressed to failure to determine their compressive strength. Specimens were then ashed to determine their bone mineral content (BMC). Parameters were compared using ANOVA and linear regression.Introduction
Methods
