Abstract
Introduction
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk in vivo. However, it has limitations in the spine because vertebrae show marked regional variations in BMD that are difficult to detect clinically. This study investigated whether micro-CT can provide improved estimates of BMD that better predict vertebral strength.
Methods
Ten cadaveric vertebral bodies (mean age: 83.7 +/− 10.8 yrs) were scanned using lateral-projection DEXA and Micro-CT. Standardised protocols were used to determine BMD of the whole vertebral body and of anterior/posterior and superior/inferior regions. Vertebral body volume was assessed by water displacement after which specimens were compressed to failure to determine their compressive strength. Specimens were then ashed to determine their bone mineral content (BMC). Parameters were compared using ANOVA and linear regression.
Results
Measures of volumetric BMD obtained from Micro-CT were significantly higher than those obtained by DEXA (P<0.001), and estimates using the two techniques were not significantly correlated. DEXA measurements were strongly predictive of compressive strength, with areal BMD of the anterior vertebral body being the best predictor (R2 = 0.722, P = 0.002). Micro-CT measurements did not predict strength. Vertebral body BMD (derived from ash weight) correlated more highly with volumetric BMD values obtained from DEXA (R = 0.88) than those obtained from micro-CT (R = 0.72).
Conclusion
BMD assessed by lateral DEXA predicted strength and BMC of osteoporotic vertebrae more accurately than micro-CT measures. Poor correlation between BMD measurements from DEXA and micro-CT suggests that ‘phantoms’ used in Micro-CT may require fine-tuning in order to better represent osteoporotic vertebrae.
