There has been an in increase in the availability of effective biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis as well as a shift towards early diagnosis and management of the inflammatory process. This article explores the impact this may have on the place of orthopaedic surgery in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1287–9

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) utilise multimodal rehabilitation techniques to reduce post-operative pain and accelerate the rehabilitation process following surgery. Originally described following elective colonic surgery enhanced recovery pathways have gained increasing use following elective hip and knee joint replacement in recent years. Early studies have indicated that enhanced recovery pathways can reduce length of hospital stay, reduce complications and improve cost-effectiveness of joint replacement surgery. Despite this growing evidence base uptake has been slow in certain centres and many surgeons are yet to utilise enhanced recovery pathways in their practice. We look at the process and effects of implementing an enhanced recovery pathway following total hip replacement surgery at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom.

A retrospective study was initially undertaken over a four-month period to assess patient demographics, length of stay, time to physiotherapy and complication rates including re-admission within 28 days.

Based on national recommendations an enhanced recovery pathway protocol was then implemented for an elective total hip replacement list. Inclusion criteria were elective patients undergoing primary total hip replacement (THR) surgery. The pathway included pre-operative nutrition optimisation, 4mg ondansetron, 8mg dexamethasone and 1g tranexamic acid at induction and 150mL ropivacaine HCL 0.2%, 30mg ketorolac and adrenaline (RKA) mix infiltration to joint capsule, external rotators, gluteus tendon, iliotibial band, soft-tissues and skin around the hip joint. The patient was mobilised four-hours after surgery where possible and aimed to be discharged once mobile and pain was under control.

Following implementation a prospective study was undertaken to compare patient demographics, length of stay and complication rates including re-admission within 28 days.

34 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in each group pre and post-enhanced recovery pathway. Following implementation of an enhanced recovery pathway mean length of stay decreased from 5.4 days to 3.5 days (CI 1.94, p < 0.0001). Sub-group analysis based on ASA grade revealed that this reduction in length of stay was most pronounced in ASA 1 patients with mean length of stay reduced from 5.0 days to 3.2 days (CI 1.83, p < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the number of complications or re-admission rates following enhanced recovery pathway.

The enhanced recovery pathway was quick and easy to implement with co-ordination between surgeons, anaesthetist, nursing staff and patients. This observational study of consecutive primary total hip replacement patients shows a substantial reduction in length of stay with no change in complication rates after the introduction of a multimodal enhanced recovery protocol. Both of these factors reduce hospital costs for elective THR patients and may improve patient experiences.

This study was undertaken to assess for equivalence or superiority in tendon reconstruction techniques. This is an in vitro analysis of several, different, reconstruction techniques for chronic Achilles tendon ruptures. The surgical techniques have been borne out of surgical preference rather than biomechanical principles with little published research into their comparability. Surgical preferences are a result of the supposed benefits of reduced operative time, single operative incision and decreased morbidity. An animal model, after human cadaveric tissue dissection to guide the specimen construction, was used to compare the different techniques using bovine bone and tendon and tested using a material testing machine. Ultimate load to failure was recorded for all specimens and statistical analysis of the results was undertaken.

A statistically significant difference was shown between all the techniques by analysis of variance. This will guide clinical application of these techniques. The use of bone tunnels, through which the flexor hallucis longus tendon can be passed, were found to be biomechanically superior, with regard to ultimate load to failure, to either bone anchors or end-to-end tendon suture techniques. Interference screws were found to have a large range in their ultimate load suggesting a lack of consistency in the results. The mean of the bone tunnel group (482.8N, SD 83.6N) is significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the mean of the bone anchor group (180.2N, SD 19.3N), which is, in turn, significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the mean of the Bunnell group (73.7N, SD 20.9N). This study is larger than any previous study found in the literature with regard to number of study groups and allows the techniques to be compared side by side.