Abstract
This study was undertaken to assess for equivalence or superiority in tendon reconstruction techniques. This is an in vitro analysis of several, different, reconstruction techniques for chronic Achilles tendon ruptures. The surgical techniques have been borne out of surgical preference rather than biomechanical principles with little published research into their comparability. Surgical preferences are a result of the supposed benefits of reduced operative time, single operative incision and decreased morbidity. An animal model, after human cadaveric tissue dissection to guide the specimen construction, was used to compare the different techniques using bovine bone and tendon and tested using a material testing machine. Ultimate load to failure was recorded for all specimens and statistical analysis of the results was undertaken.
A statistically significant difference was shown between all the techniques by analysis of variance. This will guide clinical application of these techniques. The use of bone tunnels, through which the flexor hallucis longus tendon can be passed, were found to be biomechanically superior, with regard to ultimate load to failure, to either bone anchors or end-to-end tendon suture techniques. Interference screws were found to have a large range in their ultimate load suggesting a lack of consistency in the results. The mean of the bone tunnel group (482.8N, SD 83.6N) is significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the mean of the bone anchor group (180.2N, SD 19.3N), which is, in turn, significantly (p < 0.01) higher than the mean of the Bunnell group (73.7N, SD 20.9N). This study is larger than any previous study found in the literature with regard to number of study groups and allows the techniques to be compared side by side.
