Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator.

A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 74 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prosthesis over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Demographics, Dorr types and blood serum markers were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years.

When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking.

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are typically used to assess longitudinal change in pain and function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The Patient's Knee Implant Performance (PKIP) score was developed to evaluate outcomes more broadly including function, stability, confidence, and satisfaction. Although validated in patients having a primary TKA, the PKIP has not been evaluated as an outcome measure for patients having revision TKA. This study examined patient outcomes at one year following primary and revision TKA measured using the PKIP, compared to Oxford Knee Scores.

A retrospective analysis of pre-operative and one-year post-operative outcomes was completed for 39 patients (21 female) who had primary (n=27) or revision (n=12) TKA with a single surgeon between 2017 and 2020. The mean age was 69.2±7.4 years, and mean weight 87.4± 5.1kg. The change over time and correlation between the self-reported outcome measures was evaluated.

There was a significant improvement in the PKIP overall score at the 12-month follow-up (32± 13 v 69± 15, p= <0.001), with no significant difference between groups (3.3 points, p=0.50). Among the PKIP sub-scores, there was a significant improvement in knee confidence (3.5±2 vs 7.7±2; p<0.001), stability (3.4±2 vs 7.4±3; p<0.001) and satisfaction (2.5±1.7 vs 6.6±3, p<0.001). Between group differences in PKIP sub-scores one year after surgery were small and non-significant. For all patients, the OKS and PKIP scores were moderately correlated before surgery (r=0.64, p=<0.05), and at 1 year after surgery (r=0.61, p= <0.001).

Significant improvements in knee confidence, stability, and satisfaction one year after TKA were identified from the PKIP responses, with no significant difference between primary and revision surgery. The moderate correlation with the OKS suggests these questionnaires measure difference constructs and may provide complementary outcome information in this patient cohort.

This study aimed to analyze the effect of two different techniques of cement application: cement on bone surface (CoB) versus cement on bone surface and implant surface (CoBaI) on the short-term effect of radiolucent lines (RLL) in primary fully cemented total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with patella resurfacing.

379 fully cemented TKAs (318 patients) were included in this monocentric study. Preoperative and postoperative at week 4 and 12 month after surgery all patients had a clinical and radiological examination and were administered the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Cement was applied in two different ways among the two study groups: cement on bone surface (CoB group) or cement on bone surface and implant surface (CoBaI group). The evaluation of the presence of RLL or osteolysis was done as previously described using the updated Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System.

The mean OKS and range of motion improved significantly in both groups at the 4-week and 12-month follow-up, with no significant difference between the groups (CoB vs. CoBaI). RLL were present in 4.7% in the whole study population and were significantly higher in the CoBaI group (10.5%) at the 4-week follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up RLL were seen in 29.8% of the TKAs in the CoBaI group, whereas the incidence was lower in the CoB group (24.0% (n.s.)). There were two revisions in each group. None of these due to aseptic loosening.

Our study indicated that the application of bone cement on bone surface only might be more beneficial than onto the bone surface and onto the implant surface as well in respect to the short-term presence of RLL in fully cemented primary TKA.

The long-term results will be of interest, especially in respect to aseptic loosening and might guide future directions of bone cement applications in TKA.

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective surgery performed for knee osteoarthritis. Despite this success up to 20% of patients are less than fully satisfied. Rotating platform (RP) bearings have demonstrated significant reduction in rates of wear in laboratory studies but thus far have failed to demonstrate a clinical difference compared to fixed bearing (FB) arthroplasty in patients. This may be due to studies limited by small sample size and single centre design. Additionally, no studies have utilised modern patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as PKIP to investigate differences between these bearings.

A non-randomised, prospective, multi-centre study was conducted across centres in Australia, United Kingdom and the United States from November 2012 to May 2015. Knee prosthesis included were the RP and FB models of the PFC Sigma Knee (Depuy, Synthes) and the ATTUNE Knee (Depuy, Synthes). Data was collected on pre-arthroplasty interventions, demographics and PROMs. PROMs included were the KOOS, OKS, EQ53DL and PKIP. Participants were followed-up for 2 years.

A total of 1,718 patients were recruited across 27 centres. 959 participants underwent a FB TKA, 759 participants underwent a RP TKA. No significant difference was found between RP and FB in change from baseline at 2 years across any parameter in all PROMs investigated at 2 years. Body Mass Index pre-operatively was the biggest indicator of change from baseline at 2 years.

Our data demonstrates similar improvements in the short-term in both RP and TKA across all PROMs. Patients reported similar scores in satisfaction, confidence, mobility and stability in the PKIP PROM for both RP and FB groups. We have not found any evidence to suggest that RP TKA is disadvantageous at 2 years, and this is reassuring for any surgeon looking to utilise this bearing type in practice.

Our data does not demonstrate a clinical advantage in RP TKA over FB TKA at 2 years in any PROM.

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the early 1 and 2-year clinical and radiographical follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) HRA in a multi-centric Australian cohort.

Patient undergoing HRA between September 2018 and April 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), HOOS Jr, WOMAC, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and UCLA Activity Score were collected preoperatively and at 1- and 2-years post-operation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis/loosening and heterotopic ossification formation.

209 patients were identified of which 106 reached 2-year follow-up. Of these, 187 completed PROMS at 1 year and 90 at 2 years. There was significant improvement in HOOS (p< 0.001) and OHS (p< 0.001) between the pre-operative, 1-year and 2-years outcomes. Patients also reported improved pain (p<0.001), function (p<0.001) and reduced stiffness (p<0.001) as measured by the WOMAC score. Patients had improved activity scores on the UCLA Active Score (p<0.001) with 53% reporting return to impact activity at 2 years. FJS at 1 and 2-years were not significantly different (p=0.38). There was no migration, osteolysis or loosening of any of the implants. The mean acetabular cup inclination angle was 41.3° and the femoral component shaft angle was 137°. No fractures were reported over the 2-year follow-up with only 1 patient reporting a sciatic nerve palsy.

There was early return to impact activities in more than half our patients at 2 years with no early clinical or radiological complications related to the implant. Longer term follow-up with increased patient numbers are required to restore surgeon confidence in HRA and expand the use of this novel product.

In conclusion, CoC resurfacing at 2-years post-operation demonstrate promising results with satisfactory outcomes in all recorded PROMS.

Clinical success of prostheses in joint arthroplasty is ultimately determined by survivorship and patient satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to compare (non-inferiority) a new morphometric designed stem for total hip arthroplasty (THA) against an established comparator.

A prospective randomised multi-centre study of 144 primary cementless THA performed by nine experienced orthopaedic surgeons was completed (70 received a fully coated collarless tapered stem and 70 received a morphometric designed proximally coated tapered stem). PROMs and blood serum markers were assessed preoperatively and at intervals up to 2-years postoperatively. In addition, measures of femoral stem fit, fill and subsidence at 2-years post-operatively were measured from radiographs by three observers, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.918. A mixed effects model was employed to compare the two prostheses over the study period. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Demographics and Dorr types were similar between groups. Both stems demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the pre- and post-operative measurements, with no difference at any timepoint (p > 0.05). The fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem had a non-significantly higher intra-operative femoral fracture rate (5.8% vs 1.4%, p = 0.24), with all patients treated with cable fixation and partial weight bearing. The mean subsidence at 2-years was 2.5mm +/- 2.3mm for the morphometric stem and 2.4mm +/- 1.8mm for the fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem (p = 0.879). There was one outlier in each group with increased subsidence (fully coated tapered collarless femoral stem 6.9mm, morphometric wedge stem 7.4mm), with both patients reporting thigh pain at 2 years.

When compared with an established stem, the newer designed morphometric wedge stem performed well with comparable radiological and PROM outcomes at 2 year follow up. Continued follow-up is required for long term benchmarking.

In a society whereby the incidence of obesity is increasing and medico-legal implications of treatment failure are more frequently ending with the consulting doctor, clarity is required as to any restrictions placed on common orthopaedic implants by manufacturing companies. The aim of this study was to identify any restrictions placed on the commonly used femoral stem implants in total hip replacement (THR) surgery, by the manufacturers, based on patient weight. The United Kingdom (UK) National Joint Registry (NJR) was used to identify the five most commonly used cemented and uncemented femoral stem implants during 2012. The manufacturing companies responsible for these implants were asked to provide details of any weight restrictions placed on these implants. The Corail size 6 stem is the only implant to have a weight restriction (60Kg). All other stems, both cemented and uncemented, were free of any restrictions. Fatigue fracture of the femoral stem has been well documented in the literature, particularly involving the high nitrogen stainless steel cemented femoral stems and to a lesser extent the cemented cobalt chrome and uncemented femoral stems. In all cases excessive patient weight leading to increased cantilever bending of the femoral stem was thought to be a major factor contributing to the failure mechanism. From the current literature there is clearly an association between excessive patient weight and fatigue failure of the femoral stem. We suggest avoiding, where possible, the insertion of small stems (particularly cemented stems) and large offset stems (particularly those with a modular neck) in overweight patients.

In May 2012, in airports across the globe, seven orthopaedic surgeons bravely said goodbye to their loved ones, and slowly turned towards their respective aircraft. Filled with expectation and mild trepidation they stepped into the unknown… the ABC fellowship of 2012.

We have prospectively followed up 191 consecutive primary total hip replacements utilising a collarless polished tapered (CPT) femoral stem, implanted in 175 patients between November 1992 and November 1995.

At a mean follow-up of 15.9 years (range 14 – 17.5) 86 patients (95 hips) were still alive (25 men and 61 women) and available for routine follow up. Clinical outcome was determined from a combination of the Harris (HHS) and Oxford (OHS) hip scores. Radiological assessment was with antero-posterior radiographs of both hips and a lateral radiograph of the operated hip. The radiographs were evaluated using well-recognised assessment techniques.

There was no loss to follow up, with clinical data available on all 95 hips. Five patients were too frail to undergo radiographic assessment, therefore radiological assessment was performed on 90 hips (95%). At the latest follow-up, the mean HHS was 78 (range 28 – 100) and the mean OHS was 36 (range 15 – 48). Stems subsided within the cement mantle, with a mean total subsidence of 2.1mm (range 0.4 – 24). Higher grades of heterotopic bone formation were significantly associated with males (p<0.001) and hypertrophic osteoarthritis (p<0.001). Acetabular wear was associated with increased weight (p<0.001) and male sex (p=0.005). Amongst the cohort, only 1 stem (1.1%) has been revised due to aseptic loosening. This patient required reaming of their canal prior to implantation, as a result of a previous femoral osteotomy. The rate of stem revision for any cause was 7.4% (7 stems), of which 4.2% (4 stems) resulted from infection following revision of the acetabular component. Twenty patients (21.1%) required some sort of revision procedure; all except 3 of these resulted from failure of the acetabular component. Cemented cups had a significantly lower revision burden (2.7%) than Harris Galante uncemented components (21.8%) (p<0.001).

The CPT stem continues to provide excellent radiological and clinical outcomes at 15 years following implantation. Its results are consistent with other polished tapered stem designs. Cup failure remains a problem and is related in part to inadequate bearings and biological abnormalities.

Periprosthetic femur fractures are severe complications after hip arthroplasty. There is a high re-operation rate due to malunion, refracture and stem loosening. Fixation is more rigid when screws are used for proximal fixation of the plate instead of cables. Screws penetrating the cement mantle may damage it and induce loosening of the prosthesis stem.

Introduction and aim

One of the suggested advantages of hip resurfacing arthroplasty is that it offers the possibility of straightforward revision. As the femoral canal is not violated during the resurfacing procedure, it is postulated that the outcome of revision surgery should be equivalent to that of a primary hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether revision was as straightforward and as successful as has been suggested.

We reviewed 142 consecutive primary hip arthroplasties using the Exeter Universal femoral stem implanted between 1988 and 1993 into 123 patients. 74 patients with 88 hips survived to 10 years or more and were reviewed with a mean 12 years 8 months. There was no loss to follow-up and the fate of all stems is known.

Our stem revision rate for aseptic loosening and osteolysis was 1.1% (1 stem); stem revision for any cause was 2.2% (2 stems); and re-operation for any cause was 21.6% (19 hips), all but 2 of which were due to cup failure.

All but one stem subsided within the cement mantle to an average of 1.5mm at final follow-up (0 to 8mm). One stem was revised for deep infection and one was revised for excessive periarticular osteolysis. One further stem had subsided excessively (8mm) and demonstrated lucent lines at the stem-cement and cement-bone interfaces. This was classified as a radiological failure and is awaiting revision. 28% of stems had cement mantle defects, which were associated with increased subsidence (p=0.01), but were not associated with endosteal lysis or stem failure.

Periarticular osteolysis was significantly related with the degree of polyethylene wear (p<0.001), which was in turn associated with younger age patients (p=0.01) and males (p<0.001).

The Exeter metal backed cups were a catastrophic failure with 34% revised (11 cups) for loosening. The Harris Galante cups failed with excessive wear and osteolysis, with failure to revision of 18%. Only 1 cemented Elite cup was revised for loosening and osteolysis (4%).

The Exeter Universal stem implanted outside the originator centre has excellent medium term results.

Introduction

The success of total hip replacement in the young has consistently been worse both radiologically and clinically when compared to the standard hip replacement population.