The Exeter cemented polished tapered stem design was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1970's. [i] Design and cement visco-elastic properties define clinical results [ii]; a recent study by Carrington et al. reported the Exeter stem has 100% survivorship at 7 years. [iii] Exeter stems with offsets 37.5–56 mm have length 150 mm (shoulder to tip). Shorter stems, lengths 95–125 mm, exist in offsets 30–35.5 mm. The Australian National Joint Replacement Registry recently published that at 7 years the shorter stems are performing as well as longer stems on the registry [iv]. Clinical observation indicates in some cases of shorter, narrower femora that fully seating a 150 mm stem's rasp in the canal can be difficult, which may affect procedural efficiency. This study investigates the comparative risk of rasp distal contact for the Exeter 150 mm stem or a 125 mm stem. Rasps for 37.5, 44, 50 mm offset, No.1, 150 mm length stems (Exeter, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah NJ) were compared with shortened length models using SOMA™ (Stryker Orthopaedics Modeling and Analytics technology). 637 patients' CT scanned femora were filtered for appropriate offset and size by measuring femoral-head to femoral-axis distance and midsection cancellous bone width (AP view). These femora were analyzed for distal contact (rasp to cortices) for 150 mm and 125 mm models (Figure 1). The widths of the rasp's distal tip and the cancellous bone boundary were compared to assess contact for each femur in the AP and ML views; the rasp was aligned along an ideal axis and flexed in order to pass through the femoral neck (ML view only).Introduction
Materials and Methods
Recreating the natural head center of the hip joint during hip arthroplasty is important for restoring biomechanics in order to minimize leg length discrepancies, improve soft-tissue tension, and mitigate impingement [1,2]. New tools have been developed that allow anatomical measurements and analysis of three-dimensional digital femura geometry based on CT scans [3]. The purpose of this study is to analyze the head center location of various fit-and-fill hip stem designs in relation to the natural bone head center location using a novel technique. 556 computer tomography (CT) images (SOMA™) of left femora were used in this study. The acetate templates of five fit-and-fill stem designs (Design 1: Secur-Fit Advanced, Stryker; Design 2: Secur-Fit Max, Stryker; Design 3: Summit, Depuy; Design 4: Synergy, Smith & Nephew; Design 5: Zimmer, VerSys Epoch FullCoat) were compared to each other to correlate stem sizes between different systems. The appropriate stem body size for each of the CT bones was established based on the medial offset of the bone 20 mm above the lesser trochanter (MO+20) and the stem medial offset at the medial resection point. Utilizing the commercially available offset heads for each design, the bone head centers and the stem head centers were plotted, aligning the central axis of the bone/stem as well as the MO+20 of the bone with the stem medial resection point. The percent of bone head centers within 1,2,3,4,&5 mm of a stem/head offset data point was calculated for all designs. Additionally, the distance from the bone head center to the closest stem/head offset data point and the average head offset used were calculated.INTRODUCTION:
METHODS:
Immediate post-operative stability of a cementless hip design is one of the key factors for osseointegration and therefore long-term success [1]. This study compared the initial stability of a novel, shortened, hip stem to a predicate standard tapered wedge stem design with good, long-term, clinical history. The novel stem is a shortened, flat tapered wedge stem design with a shape that was based on a bone morphology study of 556 CT scans to better fit a wide array of bone types [2]. Test methods were based on a previous study [3]. Five stems of the standard tapered wedge design (Accolade, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) and the novel stem (Accolade II, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ) were implanted into a homogenous set of 10 synthetic femora (Figure 1) utilizing large left fourth generation composite femurs (Sawbones, Pacific Labs, Seattle, WA). The six degrees-of-freedom (6 DoF) motions of the implanted stems were recorded under short-cycle stair-climbing loads. Minimum head load was 0.15 kN and the maximum load varied between 3x Body Weights (BW) and 6 BW. Loading began with 100-cycles of “normal” 3 BW and was stepped up to 4 BW, 5 BW & 6 BW for 50-cycles each. Prior to each load increase, 50 cycles of 3 BW loading was applied. This strategy allowed a repeatable measure of cyclic stability after each higher load was applied. The 6 DoF micromotion data, acquired during the repeated 3 BW loading segments, were reduced to four outcome measures: two stem migrations (retroversion and subsidence at minimum load) and two cyclic motions (cyclic retroversion and cyclic subsidence). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA with a single between-subjects factor (stem type) and repeated measures defined by load-step (3 BW, 4 BW, 5 BW 6 BW).INTRODUCTION
METHODS
The origins of the uncemented tapered wedge hip stem design currently offered by several orthopaedic device companies can be linked back to the cemented Straight Mueller type stem design first used in 1977. The design, a wedge shape with a taper angle of 6 degrees, maintains a single medial curvature for all sizes and increases laterally in the width to accommodate different size femurs. Although evolutionary improvements have been made over the years the basic body geometry of the stem has stayed mainly unchanged with excellent clinical survivorship. Over the past decade, the demographics of hip replacement have changed, with a large increase in younger male patients in the age range of 40 to 60 years. In this study the femoral fit of a novel tapered stem, designed to fit a wide array of patient types, is compared to a standard predicate tapered stem design. A bone morphology study was performed on a patient population of 556 patients using three dimensional digital data from CT-scans. To characterize the fit of the stem designs we analyzed the ratio of a distal (60mm below lesser trochanter) and a proximal (10mm above lesser trochanter) cross section. The same measurements were taken with the standard tapered stem design and the novel tapered stem design, with a given constant implantation height of 20mm above the lesser trochanter. The fit of the stems was classified as Type 1, where there was both proximal and distal engagement, Type 2, proximal engagement only, Type 3, distal engagement only. The distal and proximal engagement, Type 1, was specified with a maximum engagement difference of 2mm proximal to distal.Introduction
Methods
The current decade has seen a marked rise in popularity of minimally invasive hip replacement, done through a variety of surgical approaches. A specific downside to the direct anterior approach includes the significant difficulty getting a “straight shot” down the femoral canal for either straight, nonflexible reaming or broaching as with standard approaches. Improper alignment in the femoral canal can lead to sub-optimal load transfer and thus compromised fixation. The femoral broach and stem insertion path for this approach is best described as a curved one, rather than the typical straight path. Some femoral components appear to be more suitable to this technique due to their geometries. The purpose of the study was to describe the effects that the single geometric parameter, stem length, has on its insertion path into the femoral canal. Due to the potential introduction of human error associated with repetitively performing a specific motion, both a physical study and a computer generated analysis were conducted. For the physical portion of the study, a femoral implant body of generic fit and fill geometry was designed and manufactured. The length of the stem was varied from 40 mm to 100 mm in 10 mm increments. A medium sized synthetic femur (Sawbones, Pacific Labs, Seattle, WA) was machined to match the volume of the full length stem. The insertion path constraints were defined such that the stem had to maintain the greatest allowable insertion angle while still making contact on both the medial and lateral side of the canal during translation in the X direction. To reduce the variability in applying the constraints, a single author conducted the insertion procedure for each length stem while the path was videotaped from a fixed position directly in front of the setup. The most proximal lateral point of the stem was tracked through the insertion path and the X, Y coordinates were recorded at a frequency of 2 FPS. The area under this curve, referred to as the minimum insertion area (MIA), was calculated. For the computer generated portion of the study, a CAD model of the standard length Omnifit® (Stryker Orthopaedics) was utilized. The stem was modified to create 5 additional models where the length was progressively shortened to 65%, 55%, 45%, 35%, and 25% of original length or 91mm, 77mm, 63mm, 49mm, and 35mm respectively. The femur was created from a solidified mesh of a computed tomography (CT) scan with the canal virtually broached for a full length stem. The models were each virtually assembled within the femoral canal with the similar constraints as the physical study. Again, the most proximal lateral point of the stem was tracked through the insertion path with the coordinates recorded and the MIA was calculated. There was a non-linear relationship between stem length and the MIA with the rate of change decreasing as the stem length decreased. That is, the greatest decrease in MIA was between the standard length and next longest length in the computer simulation. It was noted that marked change in MIA began to subside between the 77mm and 63mm stems and continued this trend of having less influence onward through to the shorter lengths. Although the results of the physical study showed a higher variability than the computer generated portion, it does confirm the results of the computer generated study. Minimizing the trauma associated with THR has led most of the above authors to the direct anterior approach. However, the femoral broach and stem insertion path is best described as a curved one, rather than the typical straight path used in other approaches. This curved insertion path also has benefits for other approaches since the broaches and stem can be kept away from the abductors, minimizing the potential injury to them. Shorter stem length makes this curved insertion path easier to perform. This is the first study to describe the effect that stem length has on its insertion path into the femoral canal. As expected, the physical portion of the study showed more variability than the computer generated portion. However, the physical and computer studies correlated well, with shorter stem lengths clearly allowing a more curved insertion path. The improvement tapered off in stem lengths below 63mm. This length correlates well with the other attempts at a shorter stem. This study provides quantitative data to help with shorter stem design and possible computer navigated insertion paths.