Abstract
Introduction
The origins of the uncemented tapered wedge hip stem design currently offered by several orthopaedic device companies can be linked back to the cemented Straight Mueller type stem design first used in 1977. The design, a wedge shape with a taper angle of 6 degrees, maintains a single medial curvature for all sizes and increases laterally in the width to accommodate different size femurs. Although evolutionary improvements have been made over the years the basic body geometry of the stem has stayed mainly unchanged with excellent clinical survivorship. Over the past decade, the demographics of hip replacement have changed, with a large increase in younger male patients in the age range of 40 to 60 years. In this study the femoral fit of a novel tapered stem, designed to fit a wide array of patient types, is compared to a standard predicate tapered stem design.
Methods
A bone morphology study was performed on a patient population of 556 patients using three dimensional digital data from CT-scans. To characterize the fit of the stem designs we analyzed the ratio of a distal (60mm below lesser trochanter) and a proximal (10mm above lesser trochanter) cross section. The same measurements were taken with the standard tapered stem design and the novel tapered stem design, with a given constant implantation height of 20mm above the lesser trochanter. The fit of the stems was classified as Type 1, where there was both proximal and distal engagement, Type 2, proximal engagement only, Type 3, distal engagement only. The distal and proximal engagement, Type 1, was specified with a maximum engagement difference of 2mm proximal to distal.
Results
The standard tapered stem showed a well balanced distal to proximal ratio in the median sizes. However, with increasing stem size the distal engagement increases. The novel tapered stem design showed a well balanced proximal to distal ratio throughout the complete size range. With respect to Type 3 fit classification the novel tapered stem design showed a reduced percentage of distal engagements (2.8%) compared to the predicate standard stem (17.2%). In the 40 to 60 year old male group the distal engagements for the standard stem increases (28.2%), whereas the distal engagements for the novel stem remains unchanged (1.3%).
Discussion
The cementless, tapered wedge stem design is used in large numbers globally due to its ease of use and reproducibility. However, changing patient demographics and associated bone morphology represents a challenge for existing designs to achieve a proximal fit. The novel tapered stem design presented here was adapted to these influencing factors by optimizing the proximal to distal ratio with respect to the whole patient group resulting in a particularly marked improvement in proximal fit in the male 40–60 age group compared to predicate stem designs.
