Two stage revision is the most commonly used surgical treatment strategy for periprosthetic hip infections (PHI). The aim of our study was to assess the intra- and postoperative complications during and after two stage revision using resection arthroplasty between ex- and reimplantation. In this retrospective cohort study, all patients treated with a two stage revision using resection arthroplasty for PHI were included from 2008 to 2014. During the first stage, the prosthesis was removed resulting in a resection arthroplasty without the use a PMMA spacer. During second stage, (cemented or uncemented) reimplantation of the hip prosthesis was performed. The cohort was stratified into two groups according to the length of prosthesis-free interval (≤10 weeks and >10 weeks). Data on complications during explantation, prosthesis-free interval, reimplantation, and after reimplantation was collected. The overall complication rate between both groups was compared using the chi-squared test. The revision-free and infection-free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.Aim
Method
Despite the lack of data regarding the diagnostic validity of synovial aspiration in Girdlestone hips a Girdlestone-aspiration is often performed before reimplantation to detect a possible persistence of infection during two staged revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the synovial aspiration in Girdlestone hips, without a PMMA-Spacer, for the detection of infection persistence prior to THA reimplantation. Seventy four patients undergoing a two staged revision THA surgery between 2006 and 2013 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Both synovial cultures and CRP values were acquired before explantation of the THA and of the Girdlestone hip before reimplantation. An antibiotic holiday of 14 days was observed prior to synovial aspiration. A PJI was defined according to the following criteria: intraarticular presence of pus or a sinus tract, a periprosthetic membrane indicative of infection in the histological analysis, or a positive microbiological isolation in a minimum of two samples.Introduction
Methods
The main reasons for hip prosthesis failure are aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The real frequency of PJI is probably largely underestimated because of non-standardized definition criteria, diagnostic procedure, treatment algorithm and other confounders. Therefore, data from joint registries are not reflecting the frequency of PJI and can be misleading; particularly low-grade PJI can be frequently misdiagnosed as aseptic failure. Therefore, prospective clinical studies with standardized protocol, comprehensive diagnostic procedure and sufficient follow-up should be performed. Sonication of explanted prosthesis is highly sensitive for detection of biofilms on prosthetic surface and allows quantitative analysis of biofilm formation. We hypothesize that by using sonication, ceramic components (BIOLOX®delta, BIOLOX®forte) will show higher resistance against biofilm adhesion compared to polyethylene (PE) and metal (CoCrMo). In this prospective multicentre study (level of evidence: Ia), we included all consecutive adults ≥18 years of age, who underwent explantation of the hip prosthesis for infection or aseptic reason. Excluded were patients in whom part of the prosthetic components were retained. A standardized and comprehensive diagnostic algorithm was applied, including sonication of all removed prosthetic components for qualitative and quantitative microbiological analysis (ultrasound bath 40 kHz, 1 W/cm2, 1 min). Individual components (metal, PE, ceramic) were separately placed in sterile boxes for investigation. All patients were simultaneously included in the European Prosthetic joint infection cohort (EPJIC, Background
Methods
