While multiple factors contribute to the variability of prosthesis placement during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the accuracy of the surgeon's resection planning (positioning of the cutting block) is arguably the most critical. One may postulate that proper training, including enabling the surgeon to passively receive quantitative feedback on the cutting block position, may help him/her improve resection accuracy. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that passive reception of feedback on cutting block position improves the accuracy of the successive TKA resection planning. Five cadaveric knees (tibia and foot only) were studied. After arthrotomy, the tracker of an imageless navigation system (ExactechGPS®, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR) was attached to the tibia. A navigated TKA procedure was initiated starting with registration of anatomical landmarks. Four surgeons then positioned the tibial cutting block (without pinning) on each knee using standard extramedullary mechanical instruments. The planned target resection was neutral varus/valgus, 3° posterior slope, and 10mm resection depth referencing the lateral plateau. Each surgeon performed 3 planning trials on each of the 5 knees, removing the cutting block between attempts. The planned resections were measured using an instrumented checker provided with the navigation system, referencing the cutting block. Surgeons were informed of the resection parameters measured by the navigation system after each planning trial. The deviations in resection parameters between the resection target and the cutting block position were calculated for each planning trial. The effect of receiving passive feedback on the accuracy of successive placement of the cutting block was assessed by comparing the deviations between each surgeon's 3 trials on the same cadaver (paired-t test). Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.INTRODUCTION
Materials and Methods
The alignment of components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is perceived to be one of the most influential factors in determining the long-term outcomes. A contemporary debate exists regarding the choice of the alignment method. As a vast majority of the surgeons support the basis of the mechanical alignment philosophy (MA), others believe in the concept of anatomical alignment theory (AA) to closely match the anatomy of the femur and the tibia of the native knee [1]. This study was intended to evaluate the accuracy of achieving a planned tibial resection target using either the MA or AA methods. Five healthy cadaveric knees (tibia and foot only) were studied. Four surgeons were independently asked to position a tibial cutting block (without pinning) using conventional extramedullary mechanical instrumentation (Exactech LPI instrumentation, Gainesville, FL, USA). Surgeons were asked to target a predefined proximal tibial cut according to MA (Varus= 0°, posterior slope= 3°, resection level= 10 mm) or to AA (Varus= 3°, posterior slope= 6°, resection level= 9 mm). Once the surgeon expressed satisfaction with the achieved position of the tibial cutting block, the planned resection was recorded using an imageless guidance system (ExactechGPS®, Blue-Ortho, Grenoble, FR). Surgeons completed at least three positioning trial for each alignment method on each cadaver. The accuracy and outliers (deviated more than 2°/mm from the target [2]) of resection planning were compared between the MA and AA methods. Statistical significance was defined as p< 0.05.INTRODUCTION
Materials and Methods
Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common debilitating condition, treated across multiple health disciplines including Orthopaedics, Physiotherapy, and Rheumatology. There is little consistency in diagnostic criteria with ‘Shoulder impingement syndrome’ being used for a broad spectrum of complex pathologies. We assessed patterns in diagnostic procedures for SIS across multiple disciplines. This is a systematic review of electronic databases MEDLINE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL five years of publications, January 2009 - January 2014. Search terms for SIS included subacromial impingement syndrome, subacromial bursitis. Searches were delimited to articles written in English. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, data was then extracted by one reviewer and twenty percent of the extraction was independently assessed by the co-reviewer. Studies included were intervention studies examining individuals diagnosed with SIS and we were interested in the process and method used for the diagnosis.Background
Methods
The orthopaedic surgeon is often the first consultant to whom a patient with syringomyelia is referred. The disease is not as rare as he may suppose, but its early presenting features are very variable; if he relies solely on such familiar features as pes cavus and scoliosis, he may well miss the diagnosis. The commonest presenting symptom is pain in the head, neck, trunk or limbs; headache or neckache made worse by straining is particularly significant. A history of birth injury also may suggest the possibility of syringomyelia, especially if any spasticity subsequently worsens. Neurological features which may be diagnostic include nystagmus, dissociated sensory loss, muscle wasting, spasticity of the lower limbs or Charcot's joints. Radiographic features include erosion of the bodies of cervical vertebrae and widening of the spinal canal; if, at C5, the size of the canal exceeds that of the body by 6 millimetres in the adult, pathological dilatation is present. The presence of basilar invagination or other abnormalities of the foramen magnum, of spina bifida occulta and of scoliosis are further pointers. Thermography is a useful way of showing asymmetrical sympathetic involvement in early cases. A greater awareness of the prevalence of syringomyelia may lead to earlier diagnosis and to early operation, which appears to hold out the best hope of arresting what is all too commonly a severely disabling and progressive condition.
