Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 44 - 44
1 Oct 2019
Watt T Abbott C Oxborrow N Siddique I Verma R Angus M
Full Access

Purpose

A Virtual Spinal Clinic (VSC) was set-up at a regional spinal referral centre to see if patient care could be improved through early advice to provide timely management, early onward referral, improve patient satisfaction and minimise chronicity. The clinic was based on the successful virtual model used throughout the country within orthopaedic fracture clinics. VSC is a Consultant led multi-disciplinary (MDT) clinic run by Advanced Practitioners (AP).

Methods

A 3-month trial of the VSC was completed bi-weekly. Patients diagnosed with conservatively managed spinal fractures were referred from the on-call service. A management plan was devised by a Consultant Spinal Surgeon and communicated to patients by the AP via a telephone-call consultation where clinical advice and management could be discussed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 4 - 4
1 May 2017
Angus M Verma R Mohammad S Siddique I Dickens V Rawlinson G
Full Access

Background

Low back pain (LBP) with or without leg pain, is one of the most common causes of pain and disability and a frequent cause of attendance to emergency departments (ED). Increasing numbers of patients create a difficult challenge for clinicians to effectively and appropriately manage patients with LBP in an urgent care setting.

Purpose

To improve the management of atraumatic spinal pain patients admitted onto the emergency assessment unit (EAU) thus improving quality of care, reducing bed stay and facilitating appropriate discharge and follow-up within an interdisciplinary model.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Feb 2016
Aljawadi A Imo E Sethi G Arnall F Choudhry M George K Tambe A Verma R Yasin M Mohammed S Siddique I
Full Access

Back ground:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome after posterior spinal stabilization surgery for the management of de novo non-tuberculous bacterial spinal infection.

Method and Result:

Patients presenting to a single tertiary referral spinal centre between August 2011 and June 2014 were included in the study. 21 patients with nontuberculous bacterial infection were identified and included in the study. All patients were managed surgically with posterior stabilisation, with or without neural decompression, without debridement of the infected tissue. Neurological state was assessed using the frankel grading system before and after urgery. Long-term follow-up data was collected using SpineTango COMI questionnaires and Euro Qol EQ-5D system with a mean follow-up duration of 20 months postoperatively.

The mean improvement in neurological deficits was 0.92 Frankel grade (range 0–4). At final followup, at a mean of 20 months, mean COMI score was 4.59, average VAS for back pain was 4.28. These symptoms were having no effect or only minor effect on the work or usual activities in 52%. 38% of patients reported a good quality of life. The average EQ-5D value was 0.569. There were no problems with mobility in 44% of patients. In 72% there were no problems with self-care.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 22 - 22
1 Feb 2016
Sethi G Choudhry M Fisher B Divecha H Leach J Arnall F Verma R Yasin N Mohammed S Siddique I
Full Access

Back ground:

Previous studies have stated that presence of concomitant back pain has a negative effect on the outcome of lumbar decompression/microdiscectomy but none have actually defined what level of back pain should be considered as significant. This is a study of consecutive patients who underwent a primary single level lumbar micro decompression /microdiscectomy performed by thirty nine surgeons at a single tertiary spinal centre between August 2011 and December 2014. The aim was to determine the differential effect of the intensity of back pain and leg pain as a predictor of outcome.

Method and Result:

Data was prospectively collected using SpineTango COMI questionnaires pre-operatively and at 3 months postoperatively. 995 patients who had a complete dataset were included in the analysis. Multivariate regression analysis and ROC curves were used to evaluate factors associated with poor outcome. At 3 months follow up 72.16% of patients were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. The VAS for low back pain was a significant predictor of poor outcome. Of patients with a VAS of 6 or more 34% had a poor outcome following surgery while of patients with a VAS of less than 6, 17% had a poor outcome at three months.