header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

LEVEL OF CONCOMITANT BACK PAIN AS A PREDICTOR OF OUTCOME OF SINGLE-LEVEL MICRODECOMPRESSION SURGERY: A STUDY OF 995 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) - Annual General Meeting 2015



Abstract

Back ground:

Previous studies have stated that presence of concomitant back pain has a negative effect on the outcome of lumbar decompression/microdiscectomy but none have actually defined what level of back pain should be considered as significant. This is a study of consecutive patients who underwent a primary single level lumbar micro decompression /microdiscectomy performed by thirty nine surgeons at a single tertiary spinal centre between August 2011 and December 2014. The aim was to determine the differential effect of the intensity of back pain and leg pain as a predictor of outcome.

Method and Result:

Data was prospectively collected using SpineTango COMI questionnaires pre-operatively and at 3 months postoperatively. 995 patients who had a complete dataset were included in the analysis. Multivariate regression analysis and ROC curves were used to evaluate factors associated with poor outcome. At 3 months follow up 72.16% of patients were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. The VAS for low back pain was a significant predictor of poor outcome. Of patients with a VAS of 6 or more 34% had a poor outcome following surgery while of patients with a VAS of less than 6, 17% had a poor outcome at three months.

Conclusion:

Our study has shown that patients with pre-operative concomitant back pain with VAS of 6 or more have a significantly greater chance of a poor outcome following primary lumbar microdecompressive/microdiscectomy surgery as compared to those with a back pain VAS of less than 6.


Email:

Conflicts of interest: ‘No conflicts of interest’

Sources of funding: ‘No funding obtained’