The poor outcome of large head metal on metal total hip replacements (LHMOMTHR) in the absence of abnormal wear at the articulating surfaces has focussed attention on the trunnion / taper interface. The RedLux ultra-precision 3D form profiler provides a novel indirect optical method to detect small changes in the form and surface finish of the head taper as well as a quantitative assessment of wear volume. This study aimed to assess and compare qualitatively the tapers from well functioning small diameter, with poorly functioning LHMOMTHR's using the above technique. 3 groups of retrieval tapers were analysed (Group 1: 28 mm CoCr heads from well functioning MOMTHRs (n=5); Group 2: Large diameter CoCr heads from LHMOMTHRs revised for failure secondary to adverse reaction to metal debris (n=5); Gp 3 (control): 28 mm heads from well functioning metal on Polyethylene (MOP) THRs; n=3). Clinical data on the retrievals was collated. The Redlux profiling of modular head tapers involves a non direct method whereby an imprint of the inside surface of a modular head is taken, and this is subsequently scanned by an optical non contact sensor using dedicated equipment [1]. The wear was also measured on the bearing surface [1]. RedLux profiling of the tapers produced a taper angle and 3D surface maps. The taper angles obtained with the Redlux method were compared to those obtained using CMM measurement on 3 parts. The Redlux profiling, including imprints, was also repeated 3 times to gauge potential errors. There was no difference in mean 12/14 taper angles between groups. There was no difference in volumetric and linear wear at the bearing surface between groups. Only the LHMOMs showed transfer of pattern from the stem to the internal head taper, with clear demarcation of the contact and damaged area between head taper and stem trunnion (see figure 1 – interpretation of head taper surface features demonstrated using Redlux optical imaging). 3D surface mapping demonstrated wear patterns compatible with motion or deformations between taper and trunnion in the LHMOM group. These appearances were not seen in tapers from small diameter MOM and MOP THRs (see Figure 2).Method
Results
Edge loading commonly occurs in all bearings in hip arthroplasty. Edge loading wear can occur in these bearings when the biomechanical loading axis reaches the edge and the femoral head loads the edge of the cup producing wear damage on both the head and cup edge. When the biomechanical loading axis passes through the polished articulating surface of the acetabular component and does not reach the edge, the center of the head and the center of the cup are concentric. The resulting wear known as concentric wear is low in metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings, and is negligible in ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings. Edge loading is well defined in COC hip bearings. However, edge loading is difficult to identify in MOM bearings, since the metal bearing surfaces do not show wear patterns macroscopically. The aims of this study are to compare edge loading wear rates in COC and MOM bearings, and to relate edge loading to clinical complications. Twenty-nine failed large diameter metal-on-metal hip bearings (17 total hips, 12 resurfacings) were compared to 54 failed alumina-on-alumina bearings collected from 1998 to 2011. Most COC bearings were revised for aseptic loosening or periprosthetic bone fracture, while most MOM bearings were revised for pain, soft tissue reactions or impingement. The median time to revision was 3.2 years for the metal hip bearings and 3.5 years for alumina hip bearings. The surface topography of the femoral heads was measured using a RedLux AHP (Artificial Hip Profiler, RedLux Ltd, Southampton, UK).Introduction
Materials and Methods
Two types of ceramic materials currently used in total hip replacements are third generation hot isostatic pressed (HIPed) alumina ceramic (commercially known as BIOLOX® Ceramic bearings revised at one center from 1998 to 2010 were collected (61 bearings). Eleven Introduction
Material and Methods
Two types of ceramic materials currently used in total hip replacements are third generation hot isostatic pressed (HIPed) alumina ceramic (commercially known as BIOLOX®forte, CeramTec) and an alumina matrix composite material consisting of 75% alumina, 24% zirconia, and 1% mixed oxides (BIOLOX®delta, CeramTec). The aim of this study is to compare BIOLOX delta femoral heads to BIOLOX forte femoral heads revised within 2 years in vivo. Ceramic bearings revised at one center from 1998 to 2010 were collected (61 bearings). BIOLOX delta heads (n=11) revised between 1–33 months were compared to BIOLOX forte femoral heads with less than 24 months in vivo (n=20). The surface topography of the femoral heads was measured using a chromatically encoded confocal measurement machine (Artificial Hip Profiler, RedLux Ltd.). The median time to revision for BIOLOX delta femoral heads was 12 months, compared to 13 months for BIOLOX forte femoral heads. Sixteen out of 20 BIOLOX forte femoral heads and 6 out of 11 BIOLOX delta femoral heads had edge loading wear. The average volumetric wear rate for BIOLOX forte was 0.96 mm3/yr (median 0.13 mm3/yr), and 0.06 mm3/yr (median 0.01 mm3/yr) for BIOLOX delta (p=0.03). There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in age, gender, time to revision or femoral head diameter between the two groups. Early results suggest less volumetric wear with BIOLOX delta femoral heads in comparison to BIOLOX forte femoral heads.
