Abstract
Introduction
Edge loading commonly occurs in all bearings in hip arthroplasty. Edge loading wear can occur in these bearings when the biomechanical loading axis reaches the edge and the femoral head loads the edge of the cup producing wear damage on both the head and cup edge. When the biomechanical loading axis passes through the polished articulating surface of the acetabular component and does not reach the edge, the center of the head and the center of the cup are concentric. The resulting wear known as concentric wear is low in metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings, and is negligible in ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings. Edge loading is well defined in COC hip bearings. However, edge loading is difficult to identify in MOM bearings, since the metal bearing surfaces do not show wear patterns macroscopically. The aims of this study are to compare edge loading wear rates in COC and MOM bearings, and to relate edge loading to clinical complications.
Materials and Methods
Twenty-nine failed large diameter metal-on-metal hip bearings (17 total hips, 12 resurfacings) were compared to 54 failed alumina-on-alumina bearings collected from 1998 to 2011. Most COC bearings were revised for aseptic loosening or periprosthetic bone fracture, while most MOM bearings were revised for pain, soft tissue reactions or impingement. The median time to revision was 3.2 years for the metal hip bearings and 3.5 years for alumina hip bearings. The surface topography of the femoral heads was measured using a RedLux AHP (Artificial Hip Profiler, RedLux Ltd, Southampton, UK).
Results
Forty-five out of fifty-four bearings (83%) alumina bearings and 15 out 29 (52%) metal bearings had edge loading wear (p<0.01). There was no difference in the median volumetric wear rates, which were 0.25 mm3/yr for metal femoral heads and 0.18 mm3/yr for alumina heads (means 7.87 mm3/yr and 0.78 mm3/yr respectively). The median volumetric wear rate was 1.77 mm3/yr (mean 16.51 mm3/yr) for metal heads with edge loading and 0.01 mm3/yr (mean 0.19 mm3/yr) for metal heads without edge loading (p=0.1).
Conclusions
The median wear rates for COC and MOM bearings were the same, however MOM bearings have the potential for much higher wear rates when edge loading occurs. Most of the reasons for revision of MOM bearings were related to a biological response to the wear debris. Therefore, it may be the reactivity of the wear debris, and not the wear rate that is an important determinant for the survivorship of MOM bearings.
