Flexible fixation techniques combined with anatomic (open) syndesmosis reduction have demonstrated improved functional outcomes and rates of malreduction. Suture-button devices allow physiologic motion of the syndesmosis without need for implant removal, which may lower the risk of recurrent syndesmotic diastasis. There is limited longer-term assessment of the maintenance of reduction between static and flexible syndesmotic fixation using bilateral ankle CT evaluation.

This is an a priori planned subgroup analysis of a multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing static syndesmosis fixation (two 3.5 mm screws) with flexible fixation (single knotless Tightrope) for patients with AO- OTA 44-C injuries. Patients who completed bilateral ankle CT scans at 3- and 12-month follow-up were included. The primary outcome measure was syndesmotic malreduction based on bilateral ankle CT scans, using the uninjured, contralateral ankle as a control. Anterior (ASD), middle (MSD), and posterior (PSD) syndesmosis distance were calculated to measure syndesmosis reduction. Secondary outcomes included re-operation, adverse events and functional outcomes including the EQ5D, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OM), Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), and Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Paired samples t-tests were used to compare injured to control ankles (R, v 3.5.1).

42 patients (24 Group S, 18 Group T) were included. ASD for Group T was 5.22mm (95%CI 4.69–5.77) at 3 months compared to 4.26mm (95%CI 3.82–4.71; p=0.007) in controls and 5.38mm (95%CI 4.72–6.04) at 12 months compared to 4.44mm (95%CI 3.73–5.16; p=0.048) in controls. ASD for Group S was 4.63mm (95%CI 4.17– 5.10) at 3 months compared to 4.67mm (95%CI 4.24–5.10; p=0.61) in controls, but significantly increased to 5.73mm (95%CI 4.81–6.66) at 12 months compared to 4.65mm (95%CI 4.15–5.15; p=0.04) in controls. MSD results were similar; Group T had a larger MSD than control ankles at 3 months (p=0.03) and 12 months (p=0.01), while the MSD in Group S was not different at 3 months (p=0.80) but increased at 12 months (p=<0.01). 88% (21/24) of Group S had broken or removed screws by 12 months. Unplanned re-operation was 15% in Group S and 4% in Group T (p=0.02), with an overall re-operation rate of 30% in Group S. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for EQ-5D, OM, FADI or WPAI at 3- or 12-month follow-up.

Tightrope fixation resulted in greater diastasis of the ASD and MSD compared to contralateral, uninjured ankles at 3- and 12-months post-fixation. Group S initially had syndesmotic reduction similar to control ankles, but between 3- and 12-months post-fixation, there was significantly increased syndesmosis diastasis compared to controls. The majority of Group S (88%) had either broken screws or scheduled screw removal, which may explain the increased tibio-fibular diastasis seen at 12-months.

The benefit of using a long intramedullary device for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures is unknown. The InterTAN device (Smith and Nephew, Memphis TN) is offered in either Short (180–200 mm) or Long (260–460 mm) constructs and was designed to provide stable compression across primary intertrochanteric fracture fragments. The objective of our study was to determine whether Short InterTANs are equivalent to Long InterTANs in terms of functional and adverse outcomes for the treatment of geriatric intertrochanteric hip fractures.

108 patients with OTA classification 31A–1 and 31A–2 intertrochanteric hip fractures were included in our study and prospectively followed at one of four Canadian Level-1 Trauma Centres. Our primary outcomes included two validated primary outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), to measure function, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG), to measure motor performance. Secondary outcome measures included blood loss, length of procedure, length of stay and adverse events. A pre-injury FIM was measured by retrospective recall and all postoperative outcomes were assessed on postoperative day 3, at discharge, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. Unpaired t-tests and Chi-square tests were used for the comparison of continuous and categorical variables respectively between the Short and Long InterTAN groups. A statistically significant difference was defined as p<0.05.

Our study included 71 Short InterTAN and 37 Long InterTAN patients with 31A–1 and 31A–2 intertrochanteric hip fractures. Age, sex, BMI, side, living status and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. The mean operative time was significantly lower in the Short InterTAN group (61 mins) as compared to the Long InterTAN group (71 mins)(p0.05). There were 5 periprosthetic femur fractures in the short InterTAN group versus 1 in the long InterTAN group. Non-mechanical adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infections, pneumonia and death all had similar incidence rates between the two InterTAN groups.

Both the Short and Long InterTAN patient cohorts displayed similar improvements in performance and overall function over the course of a year following intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation. The recorded operative times for Short InterTAN fixation were significantly shorter than those recorded for the Long InterTAN patients. Alternatively, a significantly higher proportion of Short InterTAN patients sustained periprosthetic femur fractures within a year of implantation as compared to the Long InterTAN group.

Purpose

Educational handouts designed for patients are promoted as a tool to educate, increase satisfaction, and potentially improve outcome. However, the value of these educational handouts as an adjunct to standard surgical care has not been formally assessed after ankle fracture. The purpose of this study was to compare standard post-operative care following surgically treated rotational ankle fracture to care supplemented with the use of adjunctive educational handouts.

Purpose: To compare the reoperation rates of three commonly used forms of fixation for distal femur fractures.

Method: 89 patients treated between 2002 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed (mean follow up 28 months).. 40 fractures were treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN), 34 with the LISS internal fixator and 16 with a DCS construct. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically. The primary treatment outcome was the rate of secondary surgical intervention; secondary outcomes included radiographic alignment and clinical outcome measures (LEM and SF-36).

Results: Reoperation: Reoperation rate for the DCS group was 12.5%, compared to 17.5 % in the IMN group and 44 % in the LISS group. Failure rates were the same when only AO type C fractures were considered. Most concerning in the LISS group was the rate of failure in distal short oblique type A fractures, in which catastrophic failure was observed in 4 of 9 patients. Alignment was similar comparing all three groups; the average radiographic distal femoral articular angle (DFAA) of was 10 degrees valgus in the DCS group, compared to 8 degrees in the IMN group and the LISS patients.

Conclusion: Reoperation rate was highest in this study when the LISS fixator was used for distal short oblique fractures of the femur. These fractures may benefit from fixation which achieves direct interfragmentary compression, such as an intramedullary device or compression plating.

Screw fixation of the injured syndesmosis restores stability, but may reduce ankle motion. We wished to determine whether functional and radiographic results are improved by removal of syndesmosis screws. In addition, we studied whether large fragment screws have an advantage compared to small fragment screws. We hypothesised that retained intact syndesmosis screws are detrimental to ankle function.

One hundred and seven adults with ankle fractures requiring syndesmosis screw fixation between 2001 and 2005 were retrospectively studied. Indications for syndesmosis fixation were a positive intraoperative external rotation stress test or inadequate lateral column buttress. Weight bearing was encouraged six weeks postoperatively. Syndesmosis screws were only removed for tenderness, prominence or ankle dorsiflexion < 0.05.

The LEM score for patients with intact screws was 70 ± 26 compared with 85 ± 20 for broken, loosened or removed screws (p=0.05). The OM score for patients with intact screws was 48 ± 36 compared with 63 ± 27 for broken, loosened or removed screws (p=0.12). There was no difference in outcome comparing broken, loosened, and removed screws. The tibiofibular clear space for intact screws was 3.3 ± 1.3 compared with 4.1 ± 1.7 for removed, broken or loosened screws (p=0.02). There was no difference in outcome comparing large and small fragment screws.

Patients with broken, loosened or removed syndesmosis screws have better functional outcome compared to intact screws. The syndesmosis allows fibular rotation, shortening and translation during gait; the presence of an intact syndesmosis screw may restrict this motion. There was no disadvantage to leaving broken or loosened screws in-situ.