PAPER 126: DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES: A COMPARISON OF FIXATION TECHNIQUES

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the reoperation rates of three commonly used forms of fixation for distal femur fractures.

Method: 89 patients treated between 2002 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed (mean follow up 28 months).. 40 fractures were treated with an intramedullary nail (IMN), 34 with the LISS internal fixator and 16 with a DCS construct. Patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically. The primary treatment outcome was the rate of secondary surgical intervention; secondary outcomes included radiographic alignment and clinical outcome measures (LEM and SF-36).

Results: Reoperation: Reoperation rate for the DCS group was 12.5%, compared to 17.5 % in the IMN group and 44 % in the LISS group. Failure rates were the same when only AO type C fractures were considered. Most concerning in the LISS group was the rate of failure in distal short oblique type A fractures, in which catastrophic failure was observed in 4 of 9 patients. Alignment was similar comparing all three groups; the average radiographic distal femoral articular angle (DFAA) of was 10 degrees valgus in the DCS group, compared to 8 degrees in the IMN group and the LISS patients.

Conclusion: Reoperation rate was highest in this study when the LISS fixator was used for distal short oblique fractures of the femur. These fractures may benefit from fixation which achieves direct interfragmentary compression, such as an intramedullary device or compression plating.