We have tested the hypothesis that the meniscofemoral ligaments make a significant contribution to resisting anteroposterior and rotatory laxity of the posterior-cruciate-ligament-deficient knee. Eight cadaver human knees were tested for anteroposterior and rotatory laxity in a materials-testing machine. The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was then divided, followed by division of the meniscofemoral ligaments (MFLs). Laxity results were obtained for intact, PCL-deficient, and PCL-MFL-deficient knees.

Division of the MFLs in the PCL-deficient knee increased posterior laxity between 15° and 90° of flexion. Force-displacement measurements showed that the MFLs contributed 28% to the total force resisting posterior drawer at 90° of flexion in the intact knee, and 70.1% in the PCL-deficient knee. There was no effect on rotatory laxity.

This is the first study which shows a function for the MFLs as secondary restraints to posterior tibial translation. The integrity of these structures should be assessed during both imaging and arthroscopic studies of PCL-injured knees since this may affect the diagnosis and management of such injuries.

Aim: To accurately assess cross-sectional areas of the MFLs and distinguish between the mechanical properties of the anterior and posterior meniscofemoral ligaments.

Methods: Twenty-eight fresh frozen cadaveric knees were dissected to isolate the lateral meniscus and MFLs, which remained attached to the femur. The cross-sectional areas of MFLs were determined using the Race-Amis¹ casting method for measurement. The ligaments were then tensile tested in an Instron materials testing machine. The stress and strain in each sample was calculated from measurements of cross sectional area, load applied, and increase in length,.

Results: The mean cross sectional area for the anterior MFL (aMFL) was 14.7 mm² (±14.8mm²) whilst that of the posterior MFL (pMFL) was 20.9mm² (±11.6mm²). The mean loads to failure were 300.5N (±155.0N) for the aMFL and 302.5N (±157.9N) for the pMFL, with elastic moduli of 281MPa (±239MPa) and 227MPa (±128MPa) respectively. There were no significant differences in structural or material properties between the two MFLs. When compared with the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the mean ultimate loads of the MFLs were similar to those of the posterior bundle of the PCL (pPC), and their elastic moduli were analogous to the anterior bundle (aPC).

Discussion: This is the first study to distinguish between the properties of the aMFL and pMFL, and indicates that both ligaments must be given equal consideration when formulating hypotheses on function. The aMFL and pMFL may also serve mutually distinct functions in the human knee. Previous authors² have commented that the reciprocal tightening and slackening of the aPC (taut in flexion) and pPC (taut in extension) indicates a difference in function of these two components of the PCL. Others³ have similarly commented on the reciprocal tightening and slackening of the two MFLs. This may also indicate differing functions for these ligaments. It is proposed that the aMFL supplements the function of the aPC, whilst the pMFL supplements the function of the pPC. This hypothesis stimulates debate on preservation of these structures during PCL reconstruction.

Race A., Amis A.A., 1996. Cross-sectional area measurement of soft tissue. A new casting method. Journal of Biomechanics 29(9), 1207–1212.

Aim: To accurately identify the meniscofemoral ligaments in cadaveric human specimens, and to determine anatomical variations in the posterior cruciate ligament that may lead to mis-identification of these structures.

Methods: A total of 79 fresh frozen knees were examined from 45 cadavers Combined anterior and posterior approaches were used to inspect the vicinity of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) for the presence of the anterior and posterior meniscofemoral ligaments. The anterior approach utilised a medial parapatellar incision followed by division of the anterior cruciate ligament, whilst a midline posterior arthrotomy was used for the posterior approach. Further dissection facilitated inspection of the meniscal and femoral attachments of the MFLs, and measurement of their lengths. Videos of MFL and PCL motion during passive flexion of the cadaveric were also performed.

Results: In total, 74 (94%) of the 79 specimens contained at least one meniscofemoral ligament. The posterior meniscofemoral ligament (pMFL) was present in 56 (71%) specimens, whilst the anterior meniscofemoral ligament (aMFL) was present in 58 specimens (73%). Both ligaments coexisted in 40 (51%) of knees. In 15 specimens the PCL was seen to have oblique fibres, which attached proximal to the tibial attachment of the main part of the PCL. We termed this “the false pMFL”, as it could be easily mis-identified as the posterior meniscofemoral ligament. Several other anatomical variations were also identified. The mean length of the aMFL was 20.7±3.9mm, whilst that of the pMFL was 23±4.2mm. Although the lengths of the MFLs were relatively constant, there was a wide variation in thickness.

Discussion: This study confirms the high incidence of at least one MFL in humans, which suggests a functional role for these structures. The oblique fibres of the PCL can be readily mis-identfied as the pMFL. These caveats should be borne in mind, during both arthroscopic examination and in the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the knee. Although some variations of the MFLs have been reported on MRI imaging2, there has been no note of the oblique fibres of the PCL reported in the present study. As this variation was present in almost one in five of our specimens, its appearance on MRI scanning requires investigation.

The function of the meniscofemoral ligaments is undetermined, although many hypotheses comment on a role in guiding the motion of the lateral meniscus during knee flexion. Other possibilities include a function as a secondary restraint supplementing the posterior cruciate ligament.

Objective: To provide a functional, anatomical description of the posteromedial structures, allowing future biomechanical studies to evaluate how they act to restrain tibio-femoral joint motion and contribute to joint stability.

Methods: Twenty fresh cadaveric knee joints were dissected. The appearance of the medial ligament complex was recorded using still and video digital photography as the specimens were flexed, extended, internally and externally rotated.

Results: We divided the medial structures into thirds, from anterior to posterior, and into three layers from superficial to deep: Layer 1: Fascia. Layer 2: Superficial MCL. Layer 3: Deep MCL and capsule. In the Posteromedial Corner (posterior third) it is not possible to separate Layers 2 and 3. The posteromedial corner (PMC) envelops the posterior medial femoral condyle. A discrete posterior oblique ligament (POL) is not identifiable. The PMC appears to be a functional unit with a role in passively restraining tibio-femoral valgus and internal rotation with the knee extended. The semimembranosus, through its tendon sheath attachments, may act as a dynamic stabiliser.

Conclusion: The MCL appears to have three functional units:Superficial MCL, Deep MCL and PMC. We believe that this description allows a logical approach to understanding the biomechanics and surgical reconstruction of the posteromedial structures. We plan to use this anatomical study as the basis for further work to evaluate the how these functional units act.

The meniscofemoral ligaments were studied in 84 fresh-frozen knees from 49 cadavers. Combined anterior and posterior approaches were used to identify the ligaments. In total, 78 specimens (93%) contained at least one meniscofemoral ligament. The anterior meniscofemoral ligament (aMFL) was present in 62 specimens (74%), and the posterior meniscofemoral ligament (pMFL) in 58 (69%). The 42 specimens (50%) in which both ligaments were present were from a significantly younger population than that with one MFL or none (p < 0.05). Several anatomical variations were identified, including oblique fibres of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), which were seen in 16 specimens (19%). These were termed the ‘false pMFL’.

The high incidence of MFLs and their anatomical variations should be borne in mind during arthroscopic and radiological examination of the PCL. It is important to recognise the oblique fibres of the PCL on MRI in order to avoid wrongly identifying them as either a pMFL or a tear of the lateral meniscus. The increased incidence of MFLs in younger donors suggests that they degenerate with age.