WHAT DO THE BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MENISCOFEMORAL LIGAMENTS TELL US ABOUT THEIR FUNCTION?

Abstract

Aim: To accurately assess cross-sectional areas of the MFLs and distinguish between the mechanical properties of the anterior and posterior meniscofemoral ligaments.

Methods: Twenty-eight fresh frozen cadaveric knees were dissected to isolate the lateral meniscus and MFLs, which remained attached to the femur. The cross-sectional areas of MFLs were determined using the Race-Amis¹ casting method for measurement. The ligaments were then tensile tested in an Instron materials testing machine. The stress and strain in each sample was calculated from measurements of cross sectional area, load applied, and increase in length,.

Results: The mean cross sectional area for the anterior MFL (aMFL) was 14.7 mm² (±14.8mm²) whilst that of the posterior MFL (pMFL) was 20.9mm² (±11.6mm²). The mean loads to failure were 300.5N (±155.0N) for the aMFL and 302.5N (±157.9N) for the pMFL, with elastic moduli of 281MPa (±239MPa) and 227MPa (±128MPa) respectively. There were no significant differences in structural or material properties between the two MFLs. When compared with the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the mean ultimate loads of the MFLs were similar to those of the posterior bundle of the PCL (pPC), and their elastic moduli were analogous to the anterior bundle (aPC).

Discussion: This is the first study to distinguish between the properties of the aMFL and pMFL, and indicates that both ligaments must be given equal consideration when formulating hypotheses on function. The aMFL and pMFL may also serve mutually distinct functions in the human knee. Previous authors² have commented that the reciprocal tightening and slackening of the aPC (taut in flexion) and pPC (taut in extension) indicates a difference in function of these two components of the PCL. Others³ have similarly commented on the reciprocal tightening and slackening of the two MFLs. This may also indicate differing functions for these ligaments. It is proposed that the aMFL supplements the function of the aPC, whilst the pMFL supplements the function of the pPC. This hypothesis stimulates debate on preservation of these structures during PCL reconstruction.

1. Race A., Amis A.A., 1996. Cross-sectional area measurement of soft tissue. A new casting method. Journal of Biomechanics 29(9), 1207–1212.

2. RaceA., Amis A.A., 1994a. The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. Journal of Biomechanics 27(1), (13–24).

3. Friederich N F., O’Brien W., 1990. Functional anatomy of the meniscofemoral ligaments. Fourth Congress of the European Society of Sports Traumatology Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA)