Involving research users in setting priorities for research is essential to ensure research outcomes are patient-centred and to maximise research value and impact. The Musculoskeletal (MSK) Disorders Research Advisory Group Versus Arthritis led a research priority setting exercise across MSK disorders. The Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHRNI) method of setting research priorities with a range of stakeholders were utilised. The MSKD RAG identified, through consensus, four research Domains: Mechanisms of Disease; Diagnosis and Impact; Living Well with MSK disorders and Successful Translation. Following ethical approval, the research priority exercise involved four stages and two surveys, to: 1) gather research uncertainties; 2) consolidate these; 3) score uncertainties using agreed criteria of importance and impact on a score of 1–10; and 4) analyse scoring, for prioritisation.Background
Methods
Pain of lumbar facet-joint origin is a common cause of low back pain in adults, and may lead to chronic pain and disability. At present, there is no definitive research to support the use of targeted lumbar facet-joint injections to manage this pain. The study's objective was to assess the feasibility of carrying out a definitive study to evaluate the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of lumbar facet-joint injections compared to a sham procedure. This was a blinded parallel two-arm pilot randomised controlled trial. Adult patients referred to the pain and orthopaedic clinics at Barts Health NHS Trust with non-specific low back pain of at least three months' duration were considered for inclusion. Participants who had a positive result following diagnostic single medial branch nerve blocks were randomised to receive either intra-articular lumbar facet-joint injections with steroid or a sham procedure. All participants were invited to attend a combined physical and psychological programme. Questionnaires were used to assess a range of pain and disability-related issues. Healthcare utilisation and cost data were also assessed. Of 628 participants screened for eligibility, 9 were randomised to receive the study intervention and 8 participants completed the study.Purposes of the study and background
Summary of methods and results
To identify whether patients were satisfied with the overall educational component of the specialist nurse (CNS)/occupational therapist (OT) led pre-operative assessment clinic in order to identify areas which required improvement. The pre-operative specialist nurse led clinic was set up in 2002. The aim was to provide high quality information to patients undergoing elective spinal surgery in order to manage expectations and optimise post-operative recovery. Initially the clinic was specialist nurse led however, in 2006 occupational therapy input was introduced in order to provide an increased depth of information in regard to function and activities of daily living post operatively. In addition this has allowed assistive equipment to be provided pre-operatively. The format of this clinic has enhanced the patient's journey by facilitating reduced length of stay and more timely discharge. A questionnaire was forwarded to a random sample of two hundred patients who attended for pre-operative assessment in the twelve-month period between April 2014 & March 2015. Sixty questionnaires were returned (30% response rate).Purpose of Study/Background
Methodology
AIS is present in 3–5% of the general population. Large curves are associated with increased pain and reduced quality of life. However, no information is available on the impact of smaller curves, many of which do not reach secondary care. The objective of this project was to identify whether or not there is any hidden burden of disease associated with smaller spinal curves. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a population-based birth cohort that recruited over 14,000 pregnant women from the Bristol area between 1991–1992 and has followed up their offspring regularly. At aged 15 presence or absence of spinal curvature ≥6degrees was identified using the validated DXA Scoliosis Measure in 5299 participants. At aged 18 a structured pain questionnaire was administered to 4083 participants. Chi-squared was used to investigate any association between presence of a spinal curve at aged 15 and self-reported pain at aged 18 years. Sensitivity analyses were performed by rerunning analyses after excluding those who were told at aged 13 they had a spinal curve (n=27), and using a higher spinal curve cut-off of ≥10degrees. Full data was available for 3184 participants. Of these, 56.8% were female, and 4.2% non-white reflecting the local population. 202 (6.3%) had a spinal curve ≥6degrees and 125 (3.9%) had a curve ≥10degrees. The mean curve size was 12degrees. 140/202 (69.3%) had single curves, and 57.4% of these were to the right. In total 46.3% of the 3184 participants reported aches and pains that lasted for a day or longer in the previous month, consistent with previous literature. 16.3% reported back pain. Those with spinal curves ≥6degrees were 42% more likely to report back pain than those without (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.00 to 2.02, P=0.047). In addition, those with spinal curves had more days off school, were more likely to avoid activities that caused their pain, were more likely to think that something harmful is happening when they get the pain, and were more afraid of the pain than people without spinal curves (P<0.05). Sensitivity analyses did not change results. We present the first results from a population-based study of the impact of small spinal curves and identify an important hidden burden of disease. Our results highlight that small scoliotic curves that may not present to secondary care are nonetheless associated with increased pain, more days off school and avoidance of activities.
The CONNECT trial evaluated a theory-based intervention to increase low back pain patients' adherence to treatment recommendations through physiotherapists' communication behaviour. Bridging the gap between evidence and evidence-based practice, we aimed to develop an implementation intervention to support physiotherapists in translating the CONNECT communication training into practice. A systematic approach was used to develop this intervention. 1. Focus groups underpinned by the Theoretical Domains Framework were conducted to assess CONNECT trained physiotherapists' (n = 9) perceptions of the barriers and enablers to implementing these strategies in practice; the results of which yielded four main domains; two related to factors outside the individual (i.e. social influences and environmental resources), and two related to individuals' motivation and capabilities (i.e. self –efficacy and behavioural regulation). 2. Intervention components (i.e., behavior change techniques (BCT) and mode of delivery) were chosen. BCTs were mapped to the identified domains (e.g., the BCT of self-monitoring mapped to the self-efficacy domain) and audit and feedback focused coaching was selected as the main mode of delivery based on empirical evidence and feasibility. 3. Outcome measures were selected to evaluate the proposed changes in physiotherapist practice (i.e., Health Care Climate Questionnaire). This intervention was trialed with physiotherapists (n = 2) using a case-study design. Results from patient consultation audio-recordings and follow-up interviews revealed this intervention supported the translation of evidence-based training into practice and is considered feasible and acceptable to physiotherapists.Purpose of the study and background
Methods and results
Establish the positive predictive value of clinical examination predicted radicular level to MRI. To identify the value of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) assessment tool in the assessment of patients presenting with radicular symptoms of lumbar spine source. 8 patients attending the ESP Orthopaedic triage service, presenting with radicular pain in which MRI is clinically indicated. Prospective study on patients attending ESP Orthopaedic triage service Patients were clinically examined, both parts LANSS score was completed. Following the assessment a radicular level was selected. Following MRI the results were compared. Positive predicted values (PPV) for clinical examination and sensitivity and specificity of a LANSS score>12 was calculated. LANSS score MRI report. PPV of 75% of therapist predicted level being same level or adjacent level to MRI stated level. 66% specificity and 100% sensitivity of patients in study with LANNS>12 having MRI evaluated radicular nerve root compression. This pilot suggests that clinical examination and the LANSS score is useful in establishing the presence of radicular nerve root compression. This evidence supports the need for further research.
Research literature suggests sub classification of LBP may improve clinical outcome. Audit aim is to evaluate the outcome of treatment pathways according to sub classification. Patients had standardised assessment and completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) following assessment and on discharge. Patients were subgrouped into; non specific LBP, radicular pain, LBP with high psychosocial indicators. Patients were allocated to 3 treatment pathways; individual treatment, functional Back class, back care programme. 200 adult patients referred to physiotherapy for low back pain. Exclusion criteria; red flag presentation, patient requiring advice only (n=38). Pre treatment and post treatment HAD, ODI Of 162 patients Individual treatment, 87 (40%)Functional Back Class, 41 (19%) Back Care Programme, 34 (16%). Each pathway demonstrated a clinically significant change in outcome measures. Patient's achieved an average change of between 11 – 17% dependant on pathway. This suggests that the sub classification criteria used allowed the correct pathway choice for patients conditions.
To evaluate the patient experience of patients referred to the ESP Orthopaedic Triage Service. To identify the demographic data of the patients To evaluate patients' expectations and satisfaction of the service A prospective audit of 50 new patients to the ESP service in Mountain Ash General Hospital and Prince Charles Hospital The audit was carried out over a 3 month period between December 2008 and February 2009. Patients were asked to anonymously complete a survey following their appointment. Data was collated independently and analysed with descriptive statistics. Patients referred to ESP service Self administered satisfaction survey. Mean age range 40-59 yrs (range 20 -70yrs). 50% >1 year duration of symptoms. 94% of patient's surveyed rated the service provided as good - excellent. 88% of patient's reported that they were happy to be assessed by the ESP. 96% of patients surveyed agreed they were able to discuss their treatment openly with only 10% preferring to see a Doctor. The ESP service in Cwm Taff Health board achieves a high level of patient satisfaction.
Surgery of the spine is associated with blood loss and frequently transfusion, with consequent risk of infection and reactions. It also costly, and puts a strain on national blood banks. A new blood salvage device works by ‘washing’ and centrifuging the blood lost during surgery; which can then be re-transfused into the patient. In a retrospective study 46 consecutive spinal surgeries with Cell Saver were compared with 39 matched surgeries without. Blood loss and units transfused was obtained from the transfusion database and the anaesthetic record. Average blood loss in the Cell saver group was 1382ml compared to 1405ml in the pre-Cell Saver group. Average allogenic transfusion was 1.30 units with cell saver compared to 2.78 units without. An average 2.3 units of lost blood were re-infused in the Cell Saver group. 26 (57%) of the Cell Saver group require no allogenic blood at all, whereas only 10 (26%) of patients in the pre-Cell Saver group had no transfusions. One unit of blood costs £130.52, and the Cell saver device costs £100 per patient. The average cost per patient in the Cell saver group was £270 (any transfusion plus cost of Cell Saver), compared to an average of £368.50 in the pre-Cell Saver group: a saving of £92.50. The Cell Saver decreased blood transfusions by 46% per patient and by 40% overall, a saving of £92.50 per patient. The number of patients receiving no allogenic blood increased by 31%.
Lateral oblique radiographs are considered important for the identification of spondylolytic lesions, but these projections will give a clear view only when the radiological beam is in the plane of the defect. We studied the variation in orientation of spondylolytic lesions on CT scans of 34 patients with 69 defects. There was a wide variation of angle: only 32% of defects were orientated within 15° of the 45° lateral oblique plane. Lateral oblique radiographs should not be considered as the definitive investigation for spondylolysis. We suggest that CT scans with reverse gantry angle are now more appropriate than oblique radiography for the assessment of spondylolysis. Variation in the angle of the defect may also need consideration when direct repair is being planned.
We reviewed retrospectively the role of monitoring of somatosensory spinal evoked potentials (SSEP) in 99 patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who had had operative correction with Luque-Galveston rods and sublaminar wiring. Our findings showed that SSEP monitoring was useful and that a 50% decrease in the amplitude of the trace optimised both sensitivity and specificity. The detection of true-positive results was higher than in cases of idiopathic scoliosis, but the method was less sensitive and specific and there were more false-negative results. In contrast with the findings in idiopathic scoliosis, recovery of the trace was associated with a 50% to 60% risk of neurological impairment. Only one permanent injury occurred during the use of this technique, and any temporary impairment resolved within two months.
