The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented times worldwide. From lockdowns to masks now being part of our everyday routine, to the halting of elective surgeries, the virus has touched everyone and every part of our personal and professional lives. Perhaps, now more than ever, our ability to adapt, change and persevere is critical to our survival. This year's closed meeting of The Knee Society demonstrated exactly those characteristics. When it became evident that an in-person meeting would not be feasible, The Knee Society leadership, under the direction of President John Callaghan, MD and Program Chair Craig Della Valle, MD created a unique and engaging meeting held on September 10–12, 2020. Special recognition should be given to Olga Foley and Cynthia Garcia at The Knee Society for their flexibility and creativeness in putting together a world-class flawless virtual program.

The Bone & Joint Journal is very pleased to partner with The Knee Society to once again publish the proceedings of the closed meeting of the Knee Society. The Knee Society is a United States based society of highly selected members who have shown leadership in education and research in knee surgery. It invites up to 15% international members; this includes some of the key opinion leaders in knee surgery from outside the USA.

Each year, the top research papers from The Knee Society meeting will be published and made available to the wider orthopaedic community in The Bone & Joint Journal. The first such proceedings were published in BJJ in 2019. International dissemination should help to fulfil the mission and vision of the Knee Society of advancing the care of patients with knee disorders through leadership, education and research. The quality of dissemination that The Bone & Joint Journal provides should enhance the profile of this work and allow a larger body of surgeons, associated healthcare professionals and patients to benefit from the expertise of the members of The Knee Society.

The meeting is one of the highlights of the annual academic calendar for knee surgeons. With nearly every member in attendance virtually throughout the 3 days, the top research papers from the membership were presented and discussed in a virtual format that allowed for lively interaction and discussion. There are 75 abstracts presented. More selective proceedings with full papers will be available after a robust peer review process in 2021, both online and in The Bone & Joint Journal.

The meeting commenced with the first group of scientific papers focused on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Dr Berry and colleagues from the Mayo Clinic further help to clarify the issue of serology and aspirate results to diagnose TKA PJI in the acute postoperative setting. 177 TKA's had an aspiration within 12 weeks and 22 were proven to have PJI. Their results demonstrated that acute PJI after TKA should be suspected within 6 weeks if CRP is ≥81 mg/L, synovial WBCs are ≥8500 cells/μL, and/or synovial neutrophils≥86%. Between 6– 12 weeks, concerning thresholds include a CRP ≥ 32 mg/L, synovial WBC ≥7450, and synovial neutrophils ≥ 84%. While historically the results of a DAIR procedure for PJI have been variable, Tom Fehring's study showed promise with the local delivery of vancomycin through the Intraosseous route improved early results. New member Simon Young contrasted the efficacy of the DAIR procedure when comparing early infections to late acute hematogenous PJI. DAIR failed in 63% of late hematogenous PJIs (implant age>1 year) compared to 36% of early (<1year) PJIs. Dr Masri demonstrated in a small group of patients that those with well-functioning articulating spacers can retain their spacers for over 12 months with no difference in infection from those that had a formal two stage exchange. The mental toll of PJI was demonstrated in a longitudinal study by Doug Dennis, where patient being treated with 2 stage exchange had 4x higher rates of depression compared to patient undergoing aseptic revision.

The second session focused on both postoperative issues with regards to anticoagulation and manipulation. Steven Haas demonstrated high complication rates with utilization of anticoagulation for treatment of postoperative pulmonary embolism with modern therapeutic anticoagulation (warfarin, enoxaparin, Xa inhibitors) with the Xa inhibitors demonstrating lower complication rates. Two papers focused on the topic of manipulation. Mark Pagnano presented data on timing of manipulation under anesthesia up to even past 12 months. While gains were modest, a subset of patients did achieve substantial gains in ROM > 20degrees even after 3 months post op. Dr Westrich's study demonstrated no difference in MUA outcomes with either IV sedation or neuraxial anesthesia although the length of stay was shorter in the IV sedation group. Several studies in Session II focused on kinematics and femoral component position. Dr Li's in vivo kinematic study during weightbearing flexion and gait demonstrated that several knees rotated with a lateral pivot motion and not all knees can be described with a single motion character. Dr Mayman and his group utilized a computational knee model to demonstrate that additional distal femoral resection results in increasing levels of mid -flexion instability and cautioned against the use of additional bony resection as the first line for flexion contractures. Using computer navigation, Dr Huddleston's study nicely outlined the variability in femoral component rotation to achieve a rectangular flexion gap utilizing a gap balanced method.

The third session opened the meeting on Friday morning. The focus was on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the increasing utilization of robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty. David Murray showed using registry data that for patient with higher comorbidities (ASA >3), UKA was safer and more cost effective than TKA while Dr Della Valle's group demonstrated overall lower average healthcare costs in UKA patients compared to TKA in the first 10 years after surgery. Dr Geller assessed UKA survivorship among 3 international registries. While survivorship varied by nation and designs, certain designs consistently had better overall performance. Dr Nunley and his group showed robotic navigation UKA significantly reduced outliers in alignment and overhang compared to manual UKA. Dr Catani's data demonstrated that full thickness cartilage loss should still be considered a requirement for UKA success even with robotic assistance. Despite a high dislocation rate of 4%, Mr Dodd demonstrated high survivorship for lateral UKA despite historical contraindications. The growing evidence for robotics TKA was demonstrated in two studies. Professor Haddad showed less soft tissue injury, reduced bone trauma and improved accuracy or rTKA compared to manual TKA while Dr Gustke single surgeon study showed his rTKA had improved forgotten joint scores and less ligament releasing required for balancing. Despite these finding, Dr Lee's study demonstrated that a robotic TKA could not guarantee excellent pain relief and other factors such a patient expectations and psychological factors play a role.

Our fourth session was devoted to machine learning and smart tools and modeling. Dr Meneghini used machine learning algorithms to identify optimal alignment outcomes that correlated with patient outcomes. Several parameters such as native tibial slope, femoral sagittal position and coronal limb alignment correlated with outcomes. Along the same lines, Bozic and coauthors demonstrated that using AI algorithms incorporated with PROM's improved levels of shared decision making and patient satisfaction. Dr Lombardi demonstrated that a mobile patient engagement platform that provided smart phone-based exercise and education was comparable to traditional methods. Dr Mahfouz demonstrated the accuracy of using ultrasound to produce 3D models of the bone compared to conventional CT based strategies and Dr Mahoney showed the valued of a preop 3D model in reproducing more normal knee kinematics. The last two talks of the session focused on some of the positives of the COVID-19 pandemic, namely the embracing of telemedicine by patients and surgeons as demonstrated by Dr Slover and the increasing and far reaching educational opportunities made available to residents and fellows during the pandemic.

Session five focused on risk stratification and optimization prior to TKA. Dr O'Connor demonstrated that that the implementation of an optimization program preoperatively reduced length of stay and ED visits, and Charles Nelson's study showed that risk stratification tool can lower complication rates in obese patients undergoing TKA comparable to those that are nonobese. Dr Markel's study demonstrated that those who have preoperative depression and anxiety are at higher risk of complications and readmissions after surgery and these issues should be addressed preoperatively. Interestingly, a study by Dr Callaghan demonstrated that care improvement pathways have not lowered the gap in complications for morbidly obese patients undergoing TKA, Dr Barsoum argued that the overall complication rates were low and this patient cohort had significant gains in PROMS after TKA that would not be experienced if arbitrary cutoff for limited surgery were established.

The final session on Friday, Session six, had several well done and interesting studies. There continues to be mounting evidence that liposomal bupivacaine has little effect on managing post-operative pain to warrant its increased use. Bill Macaulay and colleagues showed no change in pain scores, opioid consumption and functional scores when liposomal bupivacaine was discontinued at a large academic medical center. Dr Bugbee importantly demonstrated that a supervised ambulation program reduced falls in the early postoperative period. Several paper on healthcare economics were presented. Rich Iorio showed that stratifying complexity of total joint cases between hospitals with a system can be efficient and cost savings while Dr Jiranek demonstrated in his study that complex TKAs can be identified preoperatively and are associated with prolonged operative time and cost of care and consideration should be given in future reimbursement models to a complexity modifier. Dr Springer, in their evaluation of Medicare bundled payment models, demonstrated that providers and hospitals in historical bundled models that became efficient were penalized in the new model, forcing many groups to drop out and return to a fee for service model. Ron Delanois important work showed that social determinants can have a major negative impact on outcomes following TKA.

Our final day on Saturday opened with Session seven, and several interesting paper on metal ions/debris in TKA. Dr Whitesides simulator study showed the absence of scratches and material loss in a ceramic TKA compared with Co-Cr TKA and suggested an advantage to this material in patients with metal sensitivity. Conversely, in a histological study of failed TKA, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration was not associated with worse clinical outcomes or differences in revision in a series of 617 aseptic revisions, 19% of which had PVLI found on histology. The Mayo group and Dr Trousdale however, noted that serum metal ion levels can be helpful in identifying implant failure in a group of revision TKAs, especially those with metallic junctions.

Dr Dalury demonstrated nicely that use of maximally conforming inserts did not have a negative effect on implant loosening in a series of 76 revision TKA's at an average follow up of 7 years, while Kevin Garvin and his group showed no difference in end of stem pain between cemented and cementless stems in revision TKA. The final two studies in the session by Bolognesi and Peters respectively showed that metaphyseal cones continue to demonstrate excelled survivorship in rTKA setting despite extensive bone loss.

Session eight was highlighted by a large series of revision reported by new member Dr Schwarzkopf, who showed that revision TKA done by high volume surgeons demonstrated better outcomes and lower revision rates compared to surgeon who did less than 18 rTKA's per year. Dr Maniar importantly showed that preoperatively, patients with high activity level and low pain and indicated by a high preop forgotten joint score did poorly following TKA while David Ayers nicely demonstrated that KOOS scores that assess specific postoperative outcomes can predict patient dissatisfaction after TKA. The final paper in this session by Max Courtney showed that the majority of surgical cancellations are due to medical issues, yet a minority of these undergo any intervention specifically for that condition, but they resulted in a delay of 5 months.

The first two studies of Session nine focused on polyethylene thickness. Dr Backstein demonstrated no difference in KSS scores, change in ROM and aseptic revision rates based on polyethylene thickness in a series of 195 TKA's. An interesting lab study by Dr Tim Wright showed a surprising consistency in liner thickness choice among varying levels of surgeon experience that did not correlate with applied forces or gap stability estimates. Two studies looked specifically at the issue of tibial loosening and implant design. Nam and colleagues were not able to demonstrate concerning findings for increasing tibial loosening in a tibial baseplate with a shortened tibial keel at short term follow up, while Lachiewicz demonstrated a 19% revision or revision pending rate in 223 cemented fixed bearing ATTUNE TKA at a mean of 30 months.

Our final session of the meeting, began with encouraging news, that despite only currently capturing about 40% of TJA's done in the US, the American Joint Replacement Registry data is representative of data in other representative US databases. An interesting study presented by Robert Barrack looked at bone remodeling in the proximal tibia after cemented and cementless TKA of two different designs. No significant difference was noted among the groups with the exception of the cemented thicker cobalt chrome tray which demonstrated significantly more bone mineral density loss. Along the same lines, a study out of Dr Bostrom's lab demonstrated treatment of a murine tibial model with iPTH prevents fibrous tissue formation and enhances bone formation in cementless implants. New Member Jamie Howard showed no difference in implant migration and kinematics of a single radius cementless design using either a measured resection or gap balancing technique and Dr Cushner show no difference in blood loss with cemented or cementless TKA with the use of TKA. The final two studies looked at staging and bilateral TKA's. Peter Sharkey showed that simultaneous TKA's were associated with higher complication compared to staged TKA and that staged TKA with less than a 90-day interval was not associated with higher risk. However, Mark Figgie showed that patients undergoing simultaneous TKA compared to staged TKA, missed 17 fewer days of work.

In spite of the virtual nature of the meeting, there were some outstanding scientific interactions and the material presented will continue to generate debate and to guide the direction of knee arthroplasty as we move forwards.

Introduction

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is an devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The common treatment in the US is a two-stage exchange which can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to analyze complications in the treatment course of patients undergoing two-stage exchange for PJI THA and determine when they occur.

Aims

Second-generation metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations in total hip arthroplasty (THA) were introduced in order to reduce wear-related complications. The current study reports on the serum cobalt levels and the clinical outcome at a minimum of 20 years following THA with a MoM (Metasul) or a ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing.

Introduction

Bundle payment models have clinical and economic impacts on providers. Despite efforts made to improve care, experience has shown that a few episodes with costs well above a target (bundle busters) can reduce or negate positive performances. The purpose of this study was to identify both the primary episode drivers of cost and patient factors that led to episodes above target.

Introduction

Studies are being done comparing 1-stage vs. 2-stage protocols for PJI. 1-stage protocols take an extended period of time requiring 2 separate preps and sets of instruments in order to ensure optimal sterility. While intraoperative service time is one part of the reimbursement algorithm, reimbursement has lagged behind for single stage treatment. If 1-stage results are acceptable, but not reimbursed appropriately, surgeons may be discouraged from managing PJI in a 1-stage fashion. We ask, “What is the reimbursement and intraoperative service time for 1-stage procedures compared to primary surgery?”

Introduction

Extraction of implants due to periprosthetic infection (PJI) following complex revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with extensive hardware can be a daunting undertaking for surgeon and patient alike. We question whether irrigation and debridement (I&D) has a role in this difficult situation with respect to infection control, reoperation, and function.

The goals of total knee arthroplasty are to restore the mechanical axis of the knee and create equal and symmetric tension on the ligaments throughout an arc of motion. What surgical technique best achieves this goal remains controversial.

In gap balancing, the extension space is created (distal femur and proximal tibia) and balanced. The flexion space and femoral component rotation are then set by placing tension on the collateral ligaments. This allows the femoral component to be rotated to create an equal and symmetric flexion gap based on the tension of collateral ligaments rather than arbitrary bony landmarks. In the measured resection technique, fixed bony landmarks are utilised to set femoral component rotation. Bony landmarks are subject to variations in patient's anatomy and inconsistency of the surgeon to reliably and reproducibly locate them during surgery. Fehring et al. demonstrated that 49% of knees using bony landmarks had rotational errors of greater than 3 degrees. A recent study determined that the amount of femoral component rotation necessary to create a balanced flexion gap varied based on the amount of ligament release required, calling into question the validity of using this technique to set femoral component rotation. Additionally, a study by Dennis et al. showed that setting femoral component rotation based solely on bony landmarks leads to asymmetry in the flexion gap and excessive condylar lift-off in flexion in over 60% of knees performed with a measured resection technique.

Periprosthetic fractures around the femur during and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain a common mode of failure. It is important therefore to recognise those factors that place patients at increased risk for development of this complication. Prevention of this complication, always trumps treatment. Risk factors can be stratified into: 1. Patient related factors; 2. Host bone and anatomical considerations; 3. Procedural related factors; and 4. Implant related factors.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating complication. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality. It remains, unfortunately, one of the most common modes of failure in TKA. Much attention has been paid to the treatment of PJI once it occurs. Our attention, however, should focus on how to reduce the risk of PJI from developing in the first place. Infection prevention should focus on reducing modifiable risk factors that place patients at increasing risk for developing PJI. These areas include pre-operative patient optimization and intra-operative measures to reduce risk.

Pre-operative Modifiable Risk Factors: There are several patient related factors that have been shown to increase patient's risk of developing PJI. Many of these are modifiable risk factors can and should be optimised prior to surgery. Obesity and in particular Morbid Obesity (BMI >40) has a strong association with increased risk of PJI. Appropriate and healthy weight loss strategies should be instituted prior to elective TKA. Uncontrolled Diabetes (Hgb A1C >8) and poor glycemic control around the time of surgery increases the risk for complications, especially PJI. Malnutrition should be screened for in at-risk patients. Low Albumin levels are a risk factor for PJI and should be corrected. Patients should be required to stop smoking 6 weeks prior to surgery to lower risk. Low Vitamin D levels have been show to increase risk of PJI. Reduction of colonization of patient's nares with methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and resistant (MRSA) staphylococcus should be addressed with a screen and treat program.

Intra-operative Measures to Reduce PJI: During surgery, several steps should be taken to reduce risk of infection. Appropriate dosing and timing of antibiotics is critical and a first generation cephalosporin remains the antibiotic of choice. The use of antibiotic cement remains controversial with regards to its PJI prophylactic effectiveness. The utilization of a dilute betadine lavage has demonstrated decreased rate of PJI. Maintaining normothermia is critical to improve the body's ability to fight infection. An alcohol-based skin preparation can reduce skin flora as a cause of PJI. Appropriate selection of skin incisions and soft tissue handling can reduce wound healing problems and reduce development of PJI. Likewise, the use of occlusive dressing has been shown to promote wound healing and reduce PJI rates.

Acetabular fractures, particularly in the geriatric population are on the rise. A recent study indicated a 2.4-fold increase in the incidence of acetabular fractures, with the fastest rising age group, those older than the age of 55. Controversy exists as to the role and indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly in the acute setting. Three common scenarios require further evaluation and will be addressed. 1.) What is the role of THA in the acute setting for young patients (< 55 years old)? 2.) What is the role and indications for THA in the older patient population (>55 years) and what are surgical tips to address these complex issues? 3.) What are the outcomes of THA in patients with prior acetabular fractures converted to THA?

Acetabular fractures in young patients are often the result of high energy trauma and are a life changing event. In general, preservation of the native hip joint and avoidance of arthroplasty as the first line treatment should be recommended. A recent long-term outcome study of 810 acetabular fractures treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) demonstrated 79% survivorship at 20 years with need for conversion to THA as the endpoint. Risk factors for failure were older age, degree of initial fracture displacement, incongruence of the acetabular roof and femoral head cartilage lesions. In selected younger patients, certain fracture types with concomitant injuries to articular surfaces may best be treated by acute THA.

In the elderly patient population, acetabular fractures are more likely the result of low energy trauma but often times result in more displacement, comminution and damage to the articular surface. Osteoporosis and generalised poor bone quality make adequate reduction and fixation a challenge in these acute injuries. As such, the role of acute arthroplasty is becoming more widespread. Consideration should be given to delayed arthroplasty in certain patients to allow time for fracture healing followed by THA. However, early mobilization and weight bearing is important in the elderly population and consideration should be given to acute THA. The challenge remains gaining appropriate acetabular fixation in the fractured, osteoporotic bone. Early results showed high complication rates with acetabular fixation. However, newer fixation surfaces and advances in ORIF techniques have led to improved results. In addition, the need for complex acetabular reconstruction with the use of cages or cup cage constructs may be required in this setting. Appropriate 3-D imaging is essential to evaluate the extent of involvement of the anterior and posterior columns as well as the acetabular walls. Mears et al. reported on 57 patients who underwent THA for acute acetabular fracture and reported results at a mean of 8.1 years. 79% of patient reported good or excellent results and no acetabular cups were revised for loosening.

One of the more common scenarios is the patient that presents with a prior ORIF of an acetabular fracture that has developed post-traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis of the hip and requires conversion to THA. Challenges in this patient population include dealing with prior hardware that may interfere with THA component fixation, severe stiffness of the joint making exposure difficult and prior heterotopic ossification that may put neurovascular structures at risk. Previous studies have demonstrated lower long-term survivorship of the acetabular component (71% at 20 years) compared to primary THA for osteoarthritis. New acetabular fixation surfaces should mitigate the risk of aseptic loosening in this challenging patient population.

There are numerous examples in medicine where “eminence trumps evidence.” The direct anterior approach (DA) is no exception. Its meteoric rise has largely been driven by industry and surgeon promotion. This surgical approach continues to garner interest, but this interest is largely for marketing purposes, as emerging data would suggest a high risk, low reward operation. In addition, factors such as selection bias and impact bias, have substantially swayed peoples interest into making an inferior operation look better.

There are several factors related to the direct anterior approach that should give us pause. Those include the surgeon learning curve, limited functional benefit and increased complications. There is no question the DA approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a long and steep learning curve. The majority of studies would suggest at minimum, 50–100 cases before a surgeon is comfortable with this approach and some studies would suggest the technical difficulties of this approach remain an issue even with increasing experience. This proves difficult with an attempted rapid adoption of this technique by a surgeon who may perform less than 50 THAs per year but feel the need to offer this approach to their patients for marketing purposes.

One of the many touted benefits of the DA approach is the perception of improved functional outcomes. Many of the early studies showed early improvement in gait, pain and mobility. However, these studies compared the DA approach to an anterolateral approach. Even when compared to the anterolateral approach, considered the most invasive and least muscle sparing, the benefits of the DA approach were only short term (6 weeks). The majority of retrospective studies, prospective randomised studies and meta-analyses comparing DA to a posterior approach show little, if any, benefit of one approach over another with regards to functional benefit. Another touted benefit includes a low or no dislocation risk associated with the posterior approach. On the contrary many studies have failed to demonstrate lower dislocation rates with the DA approach compared to a contemporary posterior approach. A recent registry study from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Quality Initiative (MARQI) showed equal dislocation rates between the DA and posterior approach.

Concerns have also been raised regarding unique and more frequent complications with the DA approach compared to other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Unique complications such as ankle fractures and a high incidence of nerve injury, especially damage to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, have been reported. In addition, the data now clearly show a higher incidence of complications on the femoral side, including early loosening and periprosthetic fracture.

As responsible surgeons, if we want to say the DA approach is different, then fine, we can say it's different. Claims of superiority of one approach over another have not been born our in the literature and in fact much of the data would suggest a high risk no reward operation for the DA approach compared to other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty.

Background

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is marketed with claims of superiority over other approaches. Femoral exposure can be technically challenging and potentially lead to early failure. We examined whether surgical approach is associated with early THA failure.

Introduction

Previous registry studies of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) have focused on revision outcomes following primary surgery. Less is known about the effect of ceramic bearings on infection, dislocation, and mortality as outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the Medicare population. We asked (1) does the use of C-PE bearings influence outcomes following THA as compared with metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE); and (2) does the use of COC bearings influence outcomes following THA as compared with M-PE?

Introduction

Previous studies of ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) hip bearings have focused on outcomes following primary surgery. Less is known about the utilization or outcomes of ceramic bearings in revision total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) for the Medicare population in the US. We asked (1) what is the utilization of ceramic bearings for R-THA in the Medicare population and how has it evolved over time; (2) does the use of C-PE bearings influence outcomes following R-THA as compared with metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE); and (3) does the use of COC bearings influence outcomes following R-THA as compared with M-PE?

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis remains one of the most important strategies for prevention of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with current guideline recommending a first or second generation cephalosporin. Penicillin (PCN) allergy is often reported by patients, which often results in avoidance of administration of cephalosporins due to fear of cross-reactivity. Alternative medications, such as vancomyin, are often used despite reduced antimicrobial coverage. The purpose of this study was to determine if PCN allergic patients who received vancomycin alone prior to elective primary total joint arthroplasty were at increased risk of developing a subsequent PJI.

A retrospective review of 7,602 primary total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) performed between 2005 and 2013 in two institutions were identified using a prospective institutional database. Patient reported PCN or cephalosporin allergy was electronically queried from the anesthesia note. Patients who recieved multiple prophylactic antibiotics, or had unavailable perioperative antibiotic information, or those who received medication other than cefazolin and vancomycin were excluded. PJI was determined using a cross-match with an institutional PJI database constructed from International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 codes. Logistic regression analysis was then performed to evaluate the risk of subsequent PJI.

The rate of PJI was 1.4% (32/2296) in patients with a reported PCN allergy that received vancomycin alone versus 1.1% (59/5306) in non-PCN allergic patients that received cefazolin alone. The multivariate analysis, with the given sample size, did not detect a statistically significant increased risk of PJI when vancomycin was administered alone (adjusted odds ratio: 1.23, 95% CI 0.6–3.1, p=0.35). While there was no significant differences in the organism profile between PJIs in both groups, the rate of PJI caused by resistant organisms was higher in patients who received vancomycin alone (11.9%, 7/59) compared to those who received cefazolin (3.1%, 1/32).

While administration of perioperative prophylactic vancomycin alone during elective primary arthroplasty does not seem to result in a higher rate of subsequent PJI, patients who received vancomycin alone and developed a PJI were more likely to develop an infection with an antibiotic resistant organism. Future studies are needed to determine the most appropriate prophylactic antibiotic for patients who undergo elective arthroplasty and report PCN allergy.

Surgical exposure during revision total knee arthroplasty is the most essential part of the procedure. An appropriate surgical exposure protects the extensor mechanism, facilitates safe implant removal and allows for accurate reimplantation of components and appropriate soft tissue balancing. The pre-operative plan is critical to achieving appropriate exposure in the revision setting. Evaluating the skin and previous incisions and determining range of motion will aid in deciding which exposure technique is most appropriate.

The key to exposure in revision total knee arthroplasty is patience. Approximately 90% of revision total knees can be adequately exposed with a standard medial parapatellar arthrotomy, a proximal medial tibial exposure, complete synovectomy and clearing of the medial and lateral gutters. The patella need not be everted in the revision setting and extreme care must be taken to protect the extensor mechanism. In cases where standard exposure techniques are inadequate or may jeopardise the extensor mechanism, a quadriceps snip may be performed. This takes tension off the stiff knee, is easy to repair and does not require limitation of rehabilitation protocols. The tibial tubercle osteotomy is utilised in patients with extreme stiffness and to aid in removal of well-fixed tibial components. General principles include keeping the osteotomy fragment long (8–10 cm) and leaving a lateral periosteal bridge and soft tissue attachment to aid in repair and healing of the fragment. Other techniques such as the quadricepsplasty or V-Y turndown may be utilised but are rarely needed.

The goals of total knee arthroplasty are to restore the mechanical axis of the knee and create equal and symmetric tension on the ligaments throughout an arc of motion. What surgical technique best achieves this goal remains controversial.

In gap balancing, the extension space is created (distal femur and proximal tibia) and balanced. The flexion space and femoral component rotation are then set by placing tension on the collateral ligaments. This allows the femoral component to be rotated to create an equal and symmetric flexion gap based on the tension of collateral ligaments rather than arbitrary bony landmarks. In the measured resection technique, fixed bony landmarks are utilised to set femoral component rotation. Bony landmarks are subject to variations in patient's anatomy and inconsistency of the surgeon to reliably and reproducibly locate them during surgery. Fehring et al demonstrated that 49% of knees using bony landmarks had rotational errors of greater than 3 degrees. A recent study determined that the amount of femoral component rotation necessary to create a balanced flexion gap varied based on the amount of ligament release required, calling into question the validity of using this technique to set femoral component rotation. Additionally, a study by Dennis et al, showed that setting femoral component rotation based solely on bony landmarks leads to asymmetry in the flexion gap and excessive condylar lift off in flexion in over 60% of knees performed with a measured resection technique.

Introduction: Patellar crepitus (PC) has been reported in 13% of cruciatesubstituting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients resulting from synovial tissue impingement within the femoral component intercondylar box (IB). Patient factors, component design, and technical errors have been implicated in PC. We compared primary TKA patients with PC requiring surgery against matched controls to identify significant variables.

Methods: The databases of 2 institutions were reviewed to identify patients requiring surgery for PC. A control group matched for age, sex, and BMI was identified.

Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed.

Significant variables associated with patient anatomy, implant size and alignment were subsequently investigated in a computational model to evaluate tendofemoral contact.

Results: Between 2002 and 2008, over 4000 primary TKAs were performed using the Press Fit Condylar Sigma (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana) TKA. Of these, 59 knees developed PC requiring surgery. The mean time to presentation was 10.9 months. The incidence of PC correlated with greater number of previous surgeries (1.18 vs. 0.44, p= 0.002), decreased patellar button size (35.7 vs. 37.1mm, p=0.003), shorter patellar tendon length (54.5 vs. 57.9mm, p=0.01), and increase in posterior femoral condylar offset (1.27mm vs. 0.17mm, p=0.022). Using a patellar component of 32 or 35mm significantly increased the risk of PC compared to the use of a 38 or 41mm component (p< 0.01, RR=1.61, OR 2.63). Modeling results demonstrated decreased patellar tendon length created increased tendofemoral contact near the IB, while larger buttons increased separation between the tendon and the box edge.

Conclusion: Shortened patellar tendon length and use of smaller patellar components may expose the quadriceps tendon to increased irritation as it traverses across the femoral component IB. Increasing posterior femoral offset may increase quadriceps tendon tension, further risking synovial tissue impingement within the IB.