In our department, currently there is variation in the number of xrays that patients receive following ORIF of distal radius fractures.

This audit investigated the use of xrays following ORIF of distal radius fractures. Patients were identified from daily trauma lists. Patients who had a primary ORIF or ORIF following failed conservative management were included in the study. PACS was used to identify the number of post-operative xrays performed. These were correlated with clinic letters to see if there was any change in management following xray review.

Between July and November 2013, 102 patients were admitted with distal radius fracture. Of these, 35 (mean age:51 years) had an ORIF. Four were not followed-up in Scotland. Of the remaining 31 patients, eleven had one post-operative xray, seventeen had two and three had three xrays. Of the patients who had one xray, seven had the xray in the first three weeks, the rest at six weeks. Patients who had two xrays had an xray at two and 6 weeks. Of the three patients who had three xrays, two had comminuted fractures that required further CT investigation, one for a suspicion of an intra-articular screw, the other for possibility of non-union. The third patient had no apparent reason for requiring three xrays. Thus of the 31 patients in the study, 29 did not require any further investigations.

The results show a variation in the frequency of post-operative xrays after fixation of distal radius fractures. In most cases the management plan was unchanged after plain xrays were undertaken. This suggests that a protocol driven approach to follow-up after fixation of distal radius fractures could reduce the burden on fracture clinic and radiology departments.

We propose that unless indicated by intra-operative findings or post-operative concerns, patients should have xrays at the two week review appointment.

Reconstruction of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty presents a significant surgical challenge. Such defects are associated with significant loss of host bone stock, which must be addressed in order to achieve stable implant fixation. A number of imaging techniques including CT scanning with 3D image reconstruction are available to assist the surgeon in the pre-operative planning of such procedures.

We describe the use of a novel technique to assist the pre-operative planning of severe acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty.

Patient and Methods – We present the use of this technique in the case of a 78 year old patient who presented 20 years from index procedure with severe hip pain and inability to weight bear due aseptic loosening of a previously revised total hip arthroplasty. A Paprosky 3B defect was noted with intra-pelvic migration of the acetabular component. Pre-operative investigations included: inflammatory markers, pelvic CT scan with 3D reconstruction, pelvic angiography and hip aspiration.

Using DICOM images obtained from the CT scan, we used free open source software to carry out a 3D surface render of the bony pelvis. This was processed and converted to a suitable format for 3D printing. Using selective laser sintering, a physical 3D model of the pelvis, acetabular component and proximal femur were produced. Using this model the surgeon was able to gain an accurate representation of both the position of the intra-pelvic cup and more accurately assess the loss of bone stock. This novel technique is particularly useful in the pre-operative planning of such complex acetabular defects in order to determine if/which reconstruction technique is most likely to be successful.

3D printing is a relatively recent technology, which has numerous potential clinical applications. This is the first reported case of this technology being used to assess acetabular defects during revision hip arthroplasty. The use of this technology gives the surgeon a 3D model of the pelvis, quickly (7 days from CT) and at a tenth of the cost (£280) of producing such a model through the traditional commercial routes. The model allowed the surgeon to size potential implant, quantify the amount of bone graft required (if applicable) and to more accurately classify the loss of acetabular bone stock.

The Columbus is a relatively new implant with no published medium or long term follow-up. Its extensive use within our department led to this study to review the five-year clinical outcomesof patients who had a navigated Columbus primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implanted between March 2005 and December 2006.

Case notes, departmental and hospital databases and PACS were used to identify patients and collect routine five-year review data. Information Services Division was approached for all cases of re-admission and associated complications anywhere in Scotland.

219 (90 male, 116 left) patients were identified. Mean age was 69 years (48–89) and mean BMI 32.2 (SD 5.8). Of the 219 patients operated on, twenty-one had a complication; ten still had intermittent mild to moderate pain, three had wound problems, one had a washout, one had DVT/PE within ninety days and one was diagnosed with patellar clunk syndrome. The remaining five patients had revision TKA (revision rate 2.3%), four for infection and only one due to aseptic loosening (revision rate excluding infection 0.5%). 115 patients returned to clinic at five years. Of these 96.4% were satisfied with their operation. The mean Oxford knee score had reduced from 42.5 (SD 8.2) pre-operatively to 23.6 (SD 9.2). Mean fixed flexion was 1° (SD 2.8°, range 0° to 15°) with four patients having a fixed flexion of 6° or more. Mean maximum flexion was 100° (SD 10.2°, range 60° to 120°) with two patients having flexion less than 80°. X-ray analysis showed that fourteen patients had a radiolucent line. Nine of these were not present at one year, six being at the tibial component.

These results are satisfactory. The revision rate is similar to that cited by the National Joint Registry report 2011 (2.5%). Furthermore, the revision rate excluding infection is very low.

Few doctors answer their bleep by stating who they are. Answering the phone in a formal manner is of utmost importance in the hospital setting especially by on-call teams who are normally referred patients by other specialties, general practitioners and in some cases by other hospitals.

An audit to evaluate the internal hospital communication was completed. In the first part of this audit, junior doctors within the orthopaedic department at the RAH were bleeped. Doctors were expected to answer by initiating the conversation by stating (1) name, (2) department, (3) grade and (4) a greeting. A list of omissions was recorded. If the call went through switchboard, it was expected that the hospital name was stated. The second part of the audit extended to other specialties in the RAH as well as orthopaedic departments in hospitals within the Greater Glasgow and Clyde health board (NHS GGC).

Forty-three bleeps were made to doctors of various grades over a period of two months. Nine bleeps (two from other hospitals) were not answered. Five doctors answered their bleep in full. Only twenty-one doctors stated their name whilst eleven stated their grade. In both instances the department was not necessarily stated. The results were similar between the different departments as well as between the seven hospitals offering an orthopaedic service within NHS GGC. Of the thirteen on-call doctors that were bleeped as an external call through switchboard, only one doctor stated the hospital name. This has implications since most hospitals within NHS GGC share a common switchboard.

These results emphasise the need for a protocol within NHS GGC for a standard etiquette for intra and inter hospital communication to ensure that patient safety and confidentiality is safeguarded.

Deep surgical infections are a serious complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Various protocols exist for treating these infections, each with its own advocates. In this series we report the one to five year follow-up of infected TKA that were treated with a two-stage revision knee replacement at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary between December 2003 and March 2009.

48 patients were identified from the hospital database. 6 of these were excluded as they did not meet the stipulated infection criteria. Another patient was excluded as no notes were available thereby the infection status could not be determined. Another 8 patients were excluded as these only had a first stage.

33 patients (16 male) average age 67y (49–88) met the inclusion criteria. Mean BMI was of 31.62 (19–47) and 8 patients suffered from rheumatoid arthritis. At presentation, the median for the ESR, CRP and WCC were 70.5, 133 and 8.5 respectively. The infective organism was identified in 22 patients. Following the first stage, the patients were treated with antibiotics (initially intravenous followed by oral) for an average of 11.8 weeks (4–52 weeks). This procedure failed to eliminate the infection in 6 patients (18.18%) who had further re-admissions for infection of the affected prosthesis. The resultant success rate is of over 80% which is comparable to literature data (success rates of 41% to 96% quoted). For these patients, the average time to review was 25.13 months (12–67months). At review these patients had a mean extension of 2.17° (0–10°) and a mean flexion of 98.26 (70–120°). These patients were all satisfied with their outcome.

Our results show a high successful rate of elimination of infection when a two-stage revision is used for infected knee prosthesis with over 80% of patients free of infection.