Aim

Forefoot ulcers in patients with diabetic neuropathy are a result of factors that result in increased forefoot plantar pressures. Progressive hindfoot equinus from contraction of gastrocnemius-soleus-tendo-Achilles complex and progressive plantar flexed metatarsal heads secondary to claw toe deformity results callus at the metatarsal heads which break down to ulceration. The aim is to describe 2-stage treatment pathway for managing these ulcers.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip is a condition in which the acetabulum provides insufficient coverage of the femoral head in the hip joint. This configuration gives poor biomechanical load distribution, with increased stress at the superior aspect of the joint surfaces, and can often lead to degenerative arthritis. Morphologically, the poor coverage may be due to an acetabulum that is too shallow or oriented in valgus.

The dysplastic deformity can be treated surgically with a group of similar procedures, often labeled periacetabular osteotomies or rotational acetabular osteotomies. Each involves separating the acetabulum from the pelvis and fixating the fragment back to the pelvis in an orientation with increased coverage of the femoral head. This redistributes the biomechanical loads relative to acetabulum.

Bone remodeling at the level of trabeculae is an accepted concept under research; however, it is unclear whether the hip undergoes gross morphology changes in response to changes in biomechanical loading. An understanding of the degree to which this remodeling occurs (if at all) may have an impact on surgical planning.

In this retrospective study, computed tomography (CT) scans of 13 patients (2 male, 11 female, 40 ± 9 years of age) undergoing unilateral periacetabular osteotomies were examined; scans were taken both pre-operatively and at least a year post-operatively with an in-plane resolution of 0.55 mm and a slice thickness of 1.25 mm. Scans were segmented to produce triangulated meshes for the proximal femurs and the pelvis. These scans were manually processed to isolate the articular portions of the femoral heads and acetabulums, respectively; the fovea, acetabular fossa, any osteophytes and any segmentation artifacts were excluded.

Post-operative meshes were registered to their pre-operative counterparts for both the femoral head and the acetabulum, for both the operative and non-operative hips, using the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm to 20 iterations. To account for differences in defining the edges of the articular surfaces in the manual isolation, metrics were only calculated using points that were within 0.3 mm of a normal from the opposing mesh. With the resulting matched data, nearest neighbour distances were calculated to form the remodeling metrics. Select spurious datapoints were removed manually.

For the operative femoral heads, the registered post-operative points were 0.24±0.53 mm outside of the pre-operative points. The maximum deviation was on average 1.94 mm with worst-case of 2.99 mm; the minimum deviation was −0.62 mm with worst-case of −2.06 mm. Positive numbers indicate the post-operative points are ‘outside’ of the pre-operative points – that is, farther from the head centre. The non-operative femoral heads have similar deviation values, 0.21±0.46 mm outside, with maximum and minimum deviation averaging to 1.24 mm and −0.74 mm respectively, with worst cases of 2.99mm and −1.80mm.

For the operative acetabulums, the post-operative deviations were −0.08±0.43mm. The maximum and minimum deviations averaged to 0.62mm and −0.82mm, with worst cases of 2.14mm and −1.51mm across the set. Again, the non-operative acetabulums were very similar; post-operative deviations were −0.02±0.43mm, maximum and minimum deviations averaged to 1.24mm and −0.65mm, with worst cases of 1.97mm and −2.00mm.

These quantitative measurements were reflected in manual examination of the meshes; generally speaking, there were small deviations with no overarching patterns across the anatomy.

All metrics were very similar across the same anatomy (that is, femoral head or acetabulum) regardless of whether the hip operative or non-operative. Femurs tended to ‘grow’ slightly post-operatively, but by less than a half voxel in size. Given that the CT voxels are large compared to the measured deviations, it is possible the results may be sensitive to the manual segmentations used as source data.

Manual examination of the deviations indicated a few potential trends. Seven operative and eleven non-operative acetabulums had a small patch of positive deviation (1mm to 1.5mm) in the anterosuperior aspect. This can be seen in the plot as the yellow-red area near the top right of the leftmost rendering. Other high-deviation areas included the superior aspect of the acetabulum (both positive and negative) and the superior aspect of the femoral head (generally positive).

The edges of the mesh were often a source of high deviation. This is likely an artifact of over-inclusion the manual isolation of the articular surfaces, as joint surfaces become non-articular as they move away from the joint interface.

Overall, the superior and anterosuperior aspects of the acetabulum and the superior aspect of the femoral head showed some indication of systemic changes; further study may clarify whether these data represent consistent anatomical changes. However, as the magnitude of the deviations between pre- and post-operative scans are on or below the order of the CT voxel size, we conclude that (in the absence of other strongly compelling evidence) periacetabular osteotomies for adults should be planned without the expectation of gross remodeling of the articular surfaces.

Introduction

The trochlear groove plays a major role in the mechanics and patho-mechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Our primary goal was to compare normal, osteoarthritic and dysplastic PFJs in terms of angles and distances.

A profound understanding of the pathoanatomy of the patellofemoral joint is considered to be fundamental for navigated knee arthroplasty. Previous studies used less sophisticated imaging modalities such as photography and plain radiographs or direct measurement tools like probes and micrometers to define the morphology of the trochlear groove, with differing results. This may be due to the complexity of the biomechanics and the geometry of this joint. Our primary goal was to compare normal, osteoarthritic and dysplastic PFJs in terms of angles and distances. To do this we first had to establish a reliable frame of reference.

Computed tomography scans of 40 normal knees (> 55 years old), 9 knees with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (group A) and 12 knees with trochlear dysplasia (group B) were analyzed using 3D software. The femurs were orientated using a robust frame of reference. A circle was fitted to the trochlear groove. The novel trochlear axis was defined as a line joining the centres of two spheres fitted to the trochlear surfaces, lateral and medial to the trochlear groove. The relationship between the femoral trochlea and the tibiofemoral joint was measured in term of angles and distances (offsets). T-test for paired samples was used (p< 0.05). The study was approved by the institutional review conforming to the state laws and regulations.

The normal trochlear groove closely matched a circle (RMS 0.3mm). It was positioned laterally in relation to the mechanical, anatomical, and trans-condylar axes of the femur. It was not co-planar with any of the three axes. After aligning to the new trochlear axis, the trochlear groove appeared more linear than when other axes were used. In comparison to the normal knees; the medial trochlear was smaller in group A (p=0.0003)- see figure 2. The lateral trochlear was smaller in group B (p=0.04). The trochlear groove was smaller in groups B (p=0.0003). Both trochlear centers in groups A+B were more centralized (p=0.00002–0.03). The medial trochlear center was more distal in group A (p=0.03) and the lateral trochlear center was more distal in group B (p=0.00009). The trochlear groove started more distal in group B (p=0.0007).

A better understanding of the 3-dimensional geometry can help better treat or even prevent the progression of disease to the stage of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. In osteoarthritic and dysplastic patellofemoral joints, the trochlea is both smaller and more distally located along the femur. These two factors may contribute to excessive loads that lead to early joint wear. These differences could have biomechanical implications and give us an insight into why joints fail. The data collected may also help in improving current designs and current navigational and surgical techniques used for the treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.