The 2021 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry report indicated that total shoulder replacement using both mid head (TMH) length humeral components and reverse arthroplasty (RTSA) had a lower revision rate than stemmed humeral components in anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) - for all prosthesis types and diagnoses. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of component variables in the various primary total arthroplasty alternatives for osteoarthritis in the shoulder.

Data from a large national arthroplasty registry were analysed for the period April 2004 to December 2020. The study population included all primary aTSA, RTSA, and TMH shoulder arthroplasty procedures undertaken for osteoarthritis (OA) using either cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) or non-cross-linked polyethylene (non XLPE). Due to the previously documented and reported higher revision rate compared to other anatomical total shoulder replacement options, those using a cementless metal backed glenoid components were excluded. The rate of revision was determined by Kaplan-Meir estimates, with comparisons by Cox proportional hazard models. Reasons for revision were also assessed.

For a primary diagnosis of OA, aTSA with a cemented XLPE glenoid component had the lowest revision rate with a 12-year cumulative revision rate of 4.7%, compared to aTSA with cemented non-XLPE glenoid component of 8.7%, and RTSA of 6.8%. The revision rate for TMH was lower than aTSA with cemented non-XLPE, but was similar to the other implants at the same length of follow-up. The reason for revision for cemented aTSR was most commonly component loosening, not rotator cuff deficiency.

Long stem humeral components matched with XLPE in aTSA achieve a lower revision rate compared to shorter stems, long stems with conventional polyethylene, and RTSA when used to treat shoulder OA. In all these cohorts, loosening, not rotator cuff failure was the most common diagnosis for revision.

Using a reverse engineering capability to quantify the factors that control the rigid body mechanics of the wrist, a mathematical forward animation capability and model of wrist motion that allows the carpus to move under its own rules is being developed. This characterises the isometric connections, from which was developed the Stable Central Column Theory of Carpal Mechanics - which incorporates the Law of Rules Based Motion.

This work has now advanced to the ability to reapply the extracted rules to allow rules-based rigid body reanimation of an individual wrist. As each wrist is unique, there is a given reality that each reanimation must be based on an individual wrist's unique rules, and the aspiration to create a standard or normal wrist is unrealistic.

Using True Life Anatomy (Adelaide, Aust) analysis software, the specific rules (morphology / connectivity / interaction / loading) of individual wrists have been characterised, and then reapplied in a rigid body reanimation environment using Adams (MSC Software, U.S.) software.

In the preliminary application of this biomechanics environment, by using the reverse engineering / forward reanimation process, wrist motion can be recreated - based purely on the unique rules, extracted from individual wrists. Instability of the proximal scaphoid was evident in several of the animations, and there was confirmation that the spatial attachment points of the isometric constraints are very exacting. The actual attachment and specific morphology of the carpal bones varied between individual wrists.

Using a reverse engineering and then forward reanimation process, we have been able to recreate wrist motion using the rigid body mechanics based on the Law of Rules Based Motion. Further work is required, but the potential to apply “what if” virtual surgery options to an individual injured wrist and more precisely characterise and test solutions to wrist dysfunction are becoming realised.

Arthroscopic electrosurgical tools for ablative, desiccating or coagulative effect are delivered as monopolar or bipolar probes. Monopolar electrosurgery delivers various profiles of heat energy directly to the tissue within a non-conductive irrigant (such as water or glycine) whereas bipolar electrosurgery creates an energy source by producing an electrical arc between the bipolar electrodes on the instrument head within an electro-conductive irrigation solution (saline) - and the heat generated is then transferred to the target tissues. This study investigated the heat generation within the simulated in-vitro test model to review the level of local heat production and potential local tissue heat.

In a simulated In-vitro testing environment the local heat generation using bipolar or monopolar electrosurgical probes at standard power setting in either saline or water was tested, both touching and not touching a simulated tissue target, and for variable on-times.

Monopolar generated relatively little heat when used in water and not touching the tissue. By contrast the bipolar wand generated potentially damaging local tissue temperature rises when used in saline and not touching the tissue. Both probes generated high local tissue heat when touching the tissue in their recommended irrigation solution.

Monopolar electrosurgery delivered high localized temperature to the simulated tissue surface, but produced relatively little heat when not touching the tissue in a water solution. Bipolar however created high local temperature within the fluid adjacent to the probe irrespective if it was touching the tissue or not. Activation of the bipolar probe away from the tissue in saline irrigation may create a potential harmful temperature within the fluid medium without delivering therapeutic thermal effect to the target tissues. Monopolar electrosurgery appears to deliver a more controlled thermal effect, and only when in contact with the target tissues – potentially creating a reduced collateral thermal footprint.

This paper presents an ongoing review of the use of a wedge-shaped porous metal augments in the shoulder to address glenoid retroversion as part of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA).

Seventy-five shoulders in 66 patients (23 women and 43 men, aged 42 to 85 years) with Walch grade B2 or C glenoids underwent porous metal glenoid augment (PMGA) insertion as part of aTSA. Patients received either a 15º or 30º PMGA wedge (secured by screws to the native glenoid) to correct excessive glenoid retroversion before a standard glenoid component was implanted using bone cement. Neither patient-specific guides nor navigation were used. Patients were prospectively assessed using shoulder functional assessments (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS], American Shoulder and Elbow Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], visual analogue scale [VAS] pain scores and forward elevation [FE]) preoperatively, at three, six, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter, with similar radiological surveillance.

Forty-nine consecutive series shoulders had a follow-up of greater than 24 months, with a median follow-up of 48 months (range: 24–87 months). Median outcome scores improved for OSS (21 to 44), ASES (24 to 92), VAS (7 to 0), and FE (90º to 140º). Four patients died, but no others were lost to follow-up. Apart from one infection at 18 months postoperatively and one minor peg perforation, there were no complications, hardware failures, implant displacements, significant lucency or posterior re-subluxations. Radiographs showed good incorporation of the wedge augment with correction of glenoid retroversion from median 22º (13º to 46º) to 4º. All but four glenoids were corrected to within the target range (less than 10º retroversion).

The porous metal wedge-shaped augments effectively addressed posterior glenoid deficiency as part of aTSA for rotator cuff intact osteoarthritis, producing satisfactory clinical outcomes with no signs of impending future failure.