Abstract
Arthroscopic electrosurgical tools for ablative, desiccating or coagulative effect are delivered as monopolar or bipolar probes. Monopolar electrosurgery delivers various profiles of heat energy directly to the tissue within a non-conductive irrigant (such as water or glycine) whereas bipolar electrosurgery creates an energy source by producing an electrical arc between the bipolar electrodes on the instrument head within an electro-conductive irrigation solution (saline) - and the heat generated is then transferred to the target tissues. This study investigated the heat generation within the simulated in-vitro test model to review the level of local heat production and potential local tissue heat.
In a simulated In-vitro testing environment the local heat generation using bipolar or monopolar electrosurgical probes at standard power setting in either saline or water was tested, both touching and not touching a simulated tissue target, and for variable on-times.
Monopolar generated relatively little heat when used in water and not touching the tissue. By contrast the bipolar wand generated potentially damaging local tissue temperature rises when used in saline and not touching the tissue. Both probes generated high local tissue heat when touching the tissue in their recommended irrigation solution.
Monopolar electrosurgery delivered high localized temperature to the simulated tissue surface, but produced relatively little heat when not touching the tissue in a water solution. Bipolar however created high local temperature within the fluid adjacent to the probe irrespective if it was touching the tissue or not. Activation of the bipolar probe away from the tissue in saline irrigation may create a potential harmful temperature within the fluid medium without delivering therapeutic thermal effect to the target tissues. Monopolar electrosurgery appears to deliver a more controlled thermal effect, and only when in contact with the target tissues – potentially creating a reduced collateral thermal footprint.
